Analysis of Infusion Patterns of Propofol and Remifentanil During Rigid Bronchoscopy Under Total Intravenous Anesthesia

AUTHORS

Jong Cook Park ORCID 1 , So Hui Yun ORCID 1 , * , Changhwan Kim ORCID 2

1 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Korea

2 Division of Pulmonary, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Korea

How to Cite: Park J C, Yun S H, Kim C. Analysis of Infusion Patterns of Propofol and Remifentanil During Rigid Bronchoscopy Under Total Intravenous Anesthesia, Anesth Pain Med. Online ahead of Print ; 10(4):e102983. doi: 10.5812/aapm.102983.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 10 (4); e102983
Published Online: September 7, 2020
Article Type: Research Article
Received: April 6, 2020
Revised: August 12, 2020
Accepted: August 14, 2020
Crossmark
Crossmark
CHECKING
READ FULL TEXT

Abstract

Objectives: We analyzed the dosage pattern of anesthetic drugs administered to maintain anesthesia during rigid bronchoscopy.

Methods: We enrolled a total of 81 patients who underwent rigid bronchoscopy under total intravenous anesthesia between April 2015 and March 2019. Anesthesia was maintained using propofol (target brain concentration 2.0 - 6.0 µg/mL) and remifentanil (target brain concentration 2.0 - 6.0 ng/mL). We analyzed the dosage patterns of the anesthetic agents during the procedure, as well as the changes in the dose of the anesthetic agents and the number of procedures repeated in the same patient.

Results: The dose of propofol administered per minute to maintain anesthesia was inversely correlated with the total operation time (r2 = 0.355, β = -0.067, P < 0.000) but was not significantly correlated with the number of times the procedure was repeated. The dose of remifentanil did not significantly differ during repeated procedures in the same patient.

Conclusions: The dose of propofol infusion tended to decrease over time during the rigid bronchoscopy procedure. This pattern was specific to propofol but not to remifentanil using TIVA. Understanding the pharmacokinetic properties of anesthetic drugs will help in their appropriate administration.

1. Background

Rigid bronchoscopy is performed under deep sedation or general anesthesia. Therefore, maintaining oxygenation and ventilation via the uncuffed and open rigid bronchoscope requires the use of ventilation strategies that may be difficult to perform. The appropriate ventilation technique should be determined based on staff expertise and equipment availability (1). Hence, previous studies have mainly focused on various anesthetic management methods related to ventilation care (1-4). However, there has been no study on the dosage patterns of drugs administered during anesthetic management. Anesthesia can be maintained using either the inhalation or intravenous technique. Propofol is an ideal choice for anesthesia maintenance during total intravenous anesthesia because of its rapid onset and offset, as well as its effect on airway reflex suppression. The rigid bronchoscopy procedure constantly requires intense anesthesia induction. Therefore, we expected that drug doses required to maintain adequate anesthesia would constantly be large.

2. Objectives

In this study, we aimed to analyze the infusion pattern of anesthetic drugs used to maintain anesthesia during rigid bronchoscopy.

3. Methods

3.1. Ethical Considerations

The study was performed following the principles of the 1975 Helsinki Declaration (revised in 2018) and approved by the Institutional Review Board of our hospital (IRB no. 2019-04-011).

3.2. Patient Population

We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients aged > 18 years who had undergone rigid bronchoscopy under Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) between April 2015 and March 2019. Patients whose procedure was not completed or anesthesia was interrupted during the procedure, as well as those who had missing data, were excluded.

3.3. Anesthetic Management

Noninvasive blood pressure monitoring, electrocardiography, and pulse oximetry were used for patient monitoring. The hemodynamic parameters were recorded every three minutes until the end of the procedure to monitor the change in the vital signs during the continuous infusion of anesthetic maintenance agents and every five minutes in the recovery room. General anesthesia was induced with propofol and remifentanil using a target-controlled infusion pump (Module DPS Orchestra IS 3, Fresenius Vial, France). Depending on the patient’s renal function, rocuronium (0.8 - 1.0 mg/kg) or atracurium (0.4 - 0.6 mg/kg) was used for muscle relaxation. Patients who had a history of kidney disease or whose serum creatinine levels were higher than the normal range (0.8 - 1.3 mg/dL) in the preoperative tests were administered atracurium. A rigid bronchoscope was inserted and connected to the ventilator circuit using a corrugated tube on the side port. Initially, 100% oxygen was applied via high-flow manual bagging and stabilized during the procedure. The fraction of inspired oxygen was changed from 0.5 to 1.0 while maintaining the oxygen saturation of more than 95%. Anesthesia was maintained using propofol (target brain concentration 2.0 - 6.0 µg/mL), and additional midazolam was administered as needed to keep the Bispectral index below 60. The infusion rate of remifentanil (target brain concentration 2.0 - 6.0 ng/mL) was constantly adjusted for varying systolic blood pressure and was maintained within 20% of baseline. At the end of the procedure, the bronchoscope was removed and replaced with a plain endotracheal tube to secure the airway, and then, reversal agents were administered. After extubation, patients were assessed for spontaneous breathing and recovery of consciousness and transferred to the recovery room.

3.4. Data Collection

One researcher retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records. The patients’ preoperative evaluation data were extracted, including the presence of respiratory distress, performed emergency procedures, and the cause and location of airway obstruction. Data on the procedure time, anesthesia time, and the total dosage of anesthetic drugs were collected from the anesthesia records. Data on complications related to the rigid bronchoscopy procedure (such as pain, nausea, pneumothorax) were collected from the nursing charts.

3.5. Outcome Measures

Based on the total dose of propofol and remifentanil administered during the procedure and the duration of the procedure, we converted the dose of each agent to the dose administered per minute during the procedure for each patient. We analyzed the differences in the dose of drug administered per minute according to the number of procedures. We also investigated whether differences in drug doses required to maintain anesthesia were related to the overall procedure time or the number of repeated procedures. In addition, we analyzed the incidence and the type of complications related to the procedure.

3.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (IBM SPSS Statistics 21; IBM Corp., USA). Linear regression analysis was used to determine the correlation of differences in drug doses required to maintain anesthesia with the overall procedure time and the number of repeated procedures. P values of < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Univariate regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between variables and complications. Multivariate stepwise modeling was then performed using variables with p-values of ≤ 0.25 from the univariate analysis.

4. Results

A total of 81 patients underwent rigid bronchoscopy between April 2015 and March 2019. All patients were classified within grade II to IV of the ASA physical status. Thirty-four (42.0%) patients had dyspnea before the procedure, and the most common reason for the procedure was airway mass effect due to granulation or tumor growth (38 patients, 46.9%). The most common lesion location was the main bronchi (43 patients, 53.1%), followed by the subglottic airway and the trachea (30 patients, 37%) (Table 1).

Table 1. Demographic and Perioperative Data
VariablePatientsa
Gender
Male41 (50.6)
Female40 (49.4)
Age (y)59.1 ± 12.3
Height (cm)161.1 ± 6.9
Weight (kg)63.7 ± 11.4
BMI24.7 ± 4.4
Dyspnea before the procedure34 (42.0)
Cause of airway problem
Trauma (stenosis)9 (11.1)
Mass effect (granulation, tumor growth)38 (46.9)
malacic change3 (3.7)
Correction of the previous procedure19 (23.5)
Other12 (14.8)
Site of the airway problem
Subglottic or trachea30 (37.0)
Main bronchus43 (53.1)
Branch of bronchus8 (9.9)
Procedure time (min)60.0 [38.5-75.0]
Anesthetic time (min)85.0 [65.0-105.0]
Patients received additional midazolam29 (35.8)
Total dose of midazolam (mg)1.01 ± 1.54
Total infusion rate of anesthetic drugs
Propofol (mg)567.3 ± 246.8
Remifentanil (µg)462.0 ± 272.0
Infusion rate per minute during the procedure
Propofol (mg/min)10.3 ± 3.9
Remifentanil (µg/min)7.9 ± 3.2

Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.

aData are presented as number (%), mean ± SD, or median [interquartile range].

The dose of administered propofol per minute to maintain anesthesia showed a linear correlation with the total procedure time (r2 = 0.355, β = -0.067, P < 0.001). It was estimated that there was an inverse correlation in the curve goodness of fit (r2 = 0.565, β = -0.752, P < 0.001, Figure 1). However, the dose of administered remifentanil per minute did not show a significant correlation with the total procedure time (r2 = 0.093, β = 0.305, P = 0.310). In addition, the dose of administered propofol per minute when the procedure was repeated in the same patient among those who underwent the procedure three or more times was not significantly correlated with the number of times the procedure was repeated, except for just two patients (Table 2).

Table 2. Linear Regression Analysis of the Changes in the Total Propofol Infusion Rate per Minute in Patients Who Underwent More Than Three Repeated Procedures
IDr2βP Value
A0.95-1.360.03
B0.680.990.38
C0.00-0.070.96
D0.01-0.260.89
E0.721.620.36
F0.371.200.58
G0.02-0.940.91
H0.510.450.01
I0.00-0.070.93
J0.380.520.10
Figure 1. The curve fit graph of regression analysis. The graph shows that the total propofol infusion rate per minute was inversely correlated with the procedure duration. OP time: operation time

The most common complication of rigid bronchoscopy was hemorrhage. Pneumothorax due to airway injury occurred in one patient (Table 3). However, none of the complications were life-threatening or severe. Univariate regression analysis of the complication outcome was performed using a variety of patient variables as potential predictors (Table 4).

Table 3. Complications of Rigid Bronchoscopy
VariableNumber of Patients (%)
Dental and facial trauma2 (2.4)
Hemorrhage6 (7.3)
Pneumothorax1 (1.2)
Central airway obstructiona2 (2.4)
Peripheral airway obstructionb2 (2.4)
Airway trauma2 (2.4)

aTumor, blood, secretions

bAsthma, chronic bronchitis, emphysema, bronchospasm

Table 4. Predictors of Complications in Univariate Logistic Regression Analysis
Variableχ2P ValueOR [95% CI]
Age0.360.550.98 [0.92 - 1.04]
Gender0.040.950.96 [0.24 - 3.79]
BMI2.370.140.89 [0.78 - 1.04]
ASA score0.890.350.62 [0.22 - 1.71]
Cause of airway problem0.510.470.82 [0.47 - 1.42]
Emergent situation1.940.160.39 [0.10 - 1.48]
Repetition0.750.411.14 [0.84 - 1.56]
Procedure time1.110.280.99 [0.97 - 1.01]

Abbreviations: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Score; BMI, body mass index

5. Discussion

Rigid bronchoscopy represents a challenge for anesthesiologists because it requires allowing the interventionist easy access to the airway with an adequate degree of muscle paralysis while maintaining proper ventilation and oxygenation (2-4). For any anesthetic procedure, the combination of hypnosis, analgesia, muscular relaxation, and Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) is required. Specific considerations for airway surgery via rigid bronchoscopy include the need for a rapid and complete offset of anesthetic agents.

Until the development of propofol, TIVA was rarely performed for surgeries with planned extubation owing to the prolonged emergences. Infusing propofol using pharmacokinetic parameters to target blood concentrations has been considered a significant improvement in propofol administration. Propofol has several advantages over other anesthetics, one of which is a more relaxing effect on the pharyngeal musculature compared to thiopental (5), a commonly used anesthetic induction agent. In particular, the intravenous agent is more useful than the inhalation gas due to a large amount of leakage around the scope without packing.

In the past, surgery was the primary method of treatment for central airway obstruction. Recently, palliative procedures have been widely used, such as laser resection, coagulation, balloons, and insertion of silicone stents using rigid bronchoscopes (6-8). However, even if the airway is expected to be permanently secured using the stent, some complications may arise (9). Complication rates vary depending on the patient health status and the performed procedure (10-12). Ost et al described that the predictors of the increased complication rate of therapeutic bronchoscopy include emergent situation, ASA score, repetition, and the need for moderate sedation (13). In our study, all patients underwent rigid bronchoscopy under general anesthesia, and there were no systemic cardiovascular complications that could occur during hypoxemia and hypercapnia. However, there were some local complications. Hemorrhage was the most frequent adverse event, occurring in 7% of patients, but no additional procedure was required for hemostasis. One patient developed pneumothorax, and chest tube insertion was performed.

Endobronchial tumor destruction and removal are commonly performed using rigid bronchoscopy. Other frequently used indications include mechanical dilation, endobronchial ablation, and airway stent placement for obstructions, tracheoesophageal fistulae, or tracheobronchomalacia (14-16). In this study, the most frequent indication for this procedure was a therapeutic approach to mass effects, such as granulations and tumor growth (46.9%).

This study has some limitations. The number of patients was small, and the patient’s actual plasma drug levels were not confirmed. In addition, due to the retrospective nature of the study, various aspects were not considered because the results were interpreted based only on the recorded objective facts.

Nevertheless, we found that the dose of administered propofol decreased over time. This pattern was specific to propofol but not to remifentanil during TIVA. However, the dose administered per minute was not significantly correlated with the number of times the procedure was repeated in the same patient. These results are associated with the pharmacokinetic properties of both drugs, and understanding these mechanisms will help in the adequate administration of the drug. Therefore, when maintaining anesthesia with TIVA using propofol in a rigid bronchoscope procedure, caution should be exercised since large drug doses may be required from the early stage.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Pathak V, Welsby I, Mahmood K, Wahidi M, MacIntyre N, Shofer S. Ventilation and anesthetic approaches for rigid bronchoscopy. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(4):628-34. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201309-302FR. [PubMed: 24635585].

  • 2.

    Jose RJ, Shaefi S, Navani N. Anesthesia for bronchoscopy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014;27(4):453-7. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000087. [PubMed: 24785119].

  • 3.

    Min JY, Jo H, Roh K, Chung MY. Preventing deoxygenation with high flow nasal cannula oxygen during induction of general anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: Two case reports. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(27). e15998. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015998. [PubMed: 31277092]. [PubMed Central: PMC6635262].

  • 4.

    Chadha M, Kulshrestha M, Biyani A. Anaesthesia for bronchoscopy. Indian J Anaesth. 2015;59(9):565-73. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.165851. [PubMed: 26556915]. [PubMed Central: PMC4613403].

  • 5.

    Hemmings HJ, Egan TD. Pharmacology and physiology for anesthesia. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2018.

  • 6.

    Giovacchini CX, Kessler ER, Merrick CM, Gao J, Wang X, Wahidi MM, et al. Clinical and radiographic predictors of successful therapeutic bronchoscopy for the relief of malignant central airway obstruction. BMC Pulm Med. 2019;19(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0987-3. [PubMed: 31752776]. [PubMed Central: PMC6873512].

  • 7.

    Murgu SD, Egressy K, Laxmanan B, Doblare G, Ortiz-Comino R, Hogarth DK. Central Airway Obstruction: Benign Strictures, Tracheobronchomalacia, and Malignancy-related Obstruction. Chest. 2016;150(2):426-41. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.001. [PubMed: 26874192].

  • 8.

    Ernst A, Feller-Kopman D, Becker HD, Mehta AC. Central airway obstruction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169(12):1278-97. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200210-1181SO. [PubMed: 15187010].

  • 9.

    Semaan R, Yarmus L. Rigid bronchoscopy and silicone stents in the management of central airway obstruction. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(Suppl 4):S352-62. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.11.17. [PubMed: 26807283]. [PubMed Central: PMC4700372].

  • 10.

    de Lima A, Kheir F, Majid A, Pawlowski J. Anesthesia for interventional pulmonology procedures: a review of advanced diagnostic and therapeutic bronchoscopy. Can J Anaesth. 2018;65(7):822-36. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1121-3. [PubMed: 29623556].

  • 11.

    Batra H, Yarmus L. Indications and complications of rigid bronchoscopy. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine. 2018;12(6):509-20. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2018.1473037.

  • 12.

    Dincq AS, Gourdin M, Collard E, Ocak S, D'Odemont JP, Dahlqvist C, et al. Anesthesia for adult rigid bronchoscopy. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2014;65(3):95-103. [PubMed: 25470890].

  • 13.

    Ost DE, Ernst A, Grosu HB, Lei X, Diaz-Mendoza J, Slade M, et al. Complications Following Therapeutic Bronchoscopy for Malignant Central Airway Obstruction: Results of the AQuIRE Registry. Chest. 2015;148(2):450-71. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1530. [PubMed: 25741903]. [PubMed Central: PMC4524328].

  • 14.

    Selzer AR, Murrell M, Shostak E. New trends in interventional pulmonology. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017;30(1):17-22. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000414. [PubMed: 27783022].

  • 15.

    Jeon K, Kim H, Yu CM, Koh WJ, Suh GY, Chung MP, et al. Rigid bronchoscopic intervention in patients with respiratory failure caused by malignant central airway obstruction. J Thorac Oncol. 2006;1(4):319-23. [PubMed: 17409877].

  • 16.

    Freitag L, Darwiche K. Endoscopic treatment of tracheal stenosis. Thorac Surg Clin. 2014;24(1):27-40. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2013.10.003. [PubMed: 24295657].

  • Copyright © 2020, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
    COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: