Effects of General Anesthesia Versus Spinal Anesthesia on Serum Cytokine Release after Cesarean Section: A Randomized Clinical Trial

AUTHORS

Maryam Vosoughian ORCID 1 , Mastaneh Dahi 1 , * , Shideh Dabir 1 , Mohammadreza Moshari 2 , Soodeh Tabashi 3 , Zahra Mosavi 1

1 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Anesthesiology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Anesthesiology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Anesthesiology Research Center, Tehran, Iran

How to Cite: Vosoughian M, Dahi M, Dabir S, Moshari M, Tabashi S, et al. Effects of General Anesthesia Versus Spinal Anesthesia on Serum Cytokine Release after Cesarean Section: A Randomized Clinical Trial, Anesth Pain Med. Online ahead of Print ; 11(2):e111272. doi: 10.5812/aapm.111272.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 11 (2); e111272
Published Online: April 18, 2021
Article Type: Research Article
Received: November 24, 2020
Revised: February 18, 2021
Accepted: February 18, 2021
Crossmark
Crossmark
CHECKING
READ FULL TEXT

Abstract

Background: Tissue damage caused by major surgery, such as cesarean section, may lead to a poor host immune response and excessive release of cytokines. These responses may increase the risk of infection, cause postoperative pain, and exert damaging effects on various body organs.

Objectives: Anesthesia methods may affect cytokine production after surgery. This study aimed to compare the serum levels of cytokines in general and spinal anesthesia among women undergoing cesarean section.

Methods: Thirty parturients (ASA class I and II) undergoing cesarean section were randomly assigned into two equal groups of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia. Blood samples were taken for measuring the levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) before induction of anesthesia and 30 minutes after entering the recovery room.

Results: In the general anesthesia group, the postoperative serum levels of IL-6 and TNF-α were significantly higher than the corresponding preoperative levels. Significant differences were found between the two groups in the preoperative and postoperative levels of TNF-α. Changes in the IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations were significantly higher in the general anesthesia group as compared to the spinal anesthesia group. However, there was no significant difference in the IL-6:IL-10 and TNF-α: IL-10 ratios between the two groups.

Conclusions: General anesthesia, as compared to spinal anesthesia, significantly increased the IL-6 and TNF-α levels after cesarean section. Therefore, the spinal anesthesia technique may be a better option for patients undergoing cesarean section.

1. Background

Cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-10 (IL-10), are systemic inflammatory and anti-inflammatory immune responses. They are key modulators of inflammatory reactions and are closely related to the extent of tissue damage secondary to the activity of the immune system. Anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10, can inhibit the release of TNF-α and IL-6. Cytokines are released following any tissue damage by immune cells (macrophages, lymphocytes, and mast cells) and non-immune cells (endothelial cells and fibroblasts) and play an important role in defense mechanisms, wound healing, and posttraumatic pain.

The concentrations of circulating cytokines are normally low and may be undetectable within 30 - 60 minutes after the start of surgery. The level of IL‐6 increases significantly at 2 - 4 hours after surgery. Under physiological conditions, cytokines act as immunomodulatory components, which limit potential damages or excess inflammatory reactions. Under pathological conditions, such as major surgery, trauma, hemorrhagic shock, pancreatitis, burns, and ischemia-reperfusion injury, cytokine excess may lead to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or immunosuppression. The exaggerated release of cytokines in the perioperative period may have disturbing effects on the central nervous system, cardiovascular system, lungs, liver, and kidneys. The cytokine concentrations are maximal at 24 hours after major surgeries and remain elevated for 48 - 72 hours postoperatively (1-4).

Minimally invasive techniques and laparoscopic methods are preferred over open surgeries to improve the preservation of immune function (5). The greatest increase in the IL‐6 level occurs after major procedures, such as joint replacement and major vascular and colorectal surgeries. A high IL-6 level is associated with postoperative complications and is recognized as a predictor of morbidity after surgical interventions (6, 7). Inhibition of the production of cytokines, including IL-6, can protect the body against traumatic injuries and infections under pathological conditions; therefore, cytokine inhibitors or antagonists may have the capacity to reduce tissue/organ dysfunction (8, 9).

Besides surgery, modification of the anesthesia-related immune response may decrease perioperative morbidities by reducing the proinflammatory cytokine expression (1). However, there are conflicting findings about the effects of anesthetics (5, 10, 11) and the type of anesthesia (12, 13) on cytokine release and postoperative immune responses. Cesarean section is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide, with an increasing trend (14). Recent studies have shown that a normal pregnancy is associated with a controlled inflammatory process (15), while cesarean section, as a major surgery, may aggravate the previously increased level of cytokines in pregnant women (16). Nevertheless, studies on cytokines in the cesarean section population are limited, and the results are contradictory.

2. Objectives

Therefore, this study aimed to compare the serum levels of cytokines after general anesthesia (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA) in cesarean section.

3. Methods

This prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (code: IRCT20200930048887N1). It was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (code: IR.SBMU.MSP.REC.1398.169) and conducted between June 2018 and February 2019. After obtaining informed consent from the participants, 30 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II parturients, scheduled for cesarean section, were included in the study. They were randomly assigned into two equal groups of SA and GA (15 patients per group) (Figure 1).

Randomization was carried out using a table of random numbers. The names of the groups were written on cards and placed in sequentially numbered and sealed envelopes. When an eligible woman entered the study, an envelope was opened in sequence by a person who was not involved in the study, and the participant’s group was assigned. Patients with coagulation disorders, phospholipid syndrome, and difficult intubation criteria were excluded. Also, women with a surgery duration < 60 minutes and > 2 hours were excluded from the study since a longer surgical duration might result in the greater manipulation of the viscera, the greater complexity of the procedure, and therefore, a higher release of inflammatory factors.

In the SA group, 2.8 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine (Mylan, Saint Priest, France) was injected intrathecally into the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspace with a 25 Quincke spinal needle. In the GA group, anesthesia was induced with 4-6 mg/kg of thiopental and 1 - 1.5 mg/kg of succinylcholine, and endotracheal intubation was performed while using the Sellick maneuver. Anesthesia continued with oxygen, 50% nitrous oxide, 0.8% isoflurane, and 0.15 mg/kg of atracurium. After delivery, 200 µg/70 kg of fentanyl and 2 mg/70 kg of midazolam were administered. The muscle relaxant was reversed with atropine and neostigmine, and the subjects were extubated and transferred to the recovery room. All subjects also received intravenous oxytocin after delivery and were given two 100-mg diclofenac suppositories at the end of surgery to control postoperative pain.

The anesthesia and surgery were uneventful in women. None of the subjects received transfusion during surgery. Venous blood samples were taken for measuring the levels of IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α before induction of anesthesia and 30 minutes after entering the recovery room. The serum levels of cytokines were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Mabtech, Nacka, Strand, Sweden) in the laboratory of our hospital. The laboratory staff and data analyzers were unaware of the assignment of the study groups.

SPSS version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis. Based on previous studies, at a power of 80% and significance level of 5% (delta = 6.6, SD = 9.8), a sample size of 15 patients was calculated for each anesthesia group. The student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare quantitative variables. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were also used to compare categorical variables. First, a t-test was performed for intergroup assessments. The age difference between the two groups was found to be significant. Therefore, assessments were performed in the two groups using the ANCOVA test. Also, covariance analysis allowed us to remove the effect of age as a confounding factor from the analysis. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are presented as mean ± SD.

4. Results

Thirty patients in the age range of 18 to 36 years were included in this study. The mean age of the patients in the SA group was significantly lower than the GA group. There was no significant difference in terms of other characteristics (Table 1). In the GA group, the serum levels of IL-6 and TNF-α significantly increased after surgery as compared to the preoperative levels. In the SA group, no significant difference was observed in any cytokines (Table 2). However, there were significant differences in the preoperative and postoperative levels of TNF-α between the two groups. The levels of IL-6 and IL-10 were similar in the SA and GA groups (Table 3). Changes in the IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations were significantly higher in the GA group compared to the SA group, while changes in the IL-10 level were not significant (Table 4). There were no significant differences in the ratio of IL-6 change to IL-10 change or TNF-α change to IL-10 change between the two groups (Table 5).

Table 1. The Patients’ Characteristicsa
VariablesSA Group (N = 15)GA Group (N = 15)P-Value
Age, y26.3 ± 4.9 (18-34)29.7 ± 3.1 (26-36)< 0.03b
Number of pregnancies2.2 ± 0.72.3 ± 1.50.595
Number of abortions9 (60)13 (87)0.265
Weight, kg80 ± 9.379.1 ± 9.80.28
Height, cm164.4 ± 3.4164.1 ± 3.50.31
BMI, kg/m229 ± 3.329.2 ± 2.50.35
Surgery duration, min85.7 ± 11.384 ± 110.42

Abbreviations: GA, general anesthesia group; SA, spinal anesthesia group.

aValues are expressed as mean ± SD or No. (%).

bThere was a significant difference between the groups.

Table 2. Comparison of Serum Cytokine Concentrations Before and 30 Minutes After Cesarean Section in Each Study Groupa
GroupsCytokines, pg/mLBefore SurgeryAfter SurgeryP-Value
SA groupIL-67.6 ± 12.55 ± 6.60.49
IL-104.4 ± 5.34.8 ± 3.80.80
TNF-α3.6 ± 0.33.4 ± 0.30.19
GA groupIL-62.1 ± 0.86 ± 3.10.0002b
IL-103 ± 2.13.2 ± 0.40.69
TNF-α3.3 ± 0.34.1 ± 0.6< 0.001b

Abbreviations: GA, general anesthesia group; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-10, interleukin-10; SA, spinal anesthesia group, TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

aValues are expressed as mean ± SD.

bThere was a significant difference between the groups.

Table 3. Comparison of Serum Cytokine Concentrations Between the Two Groups
Cytokines TimeSA Group (N = 15)GA Group (N = 15)P-Value
IL-6, pg/mLBefore surgery7.6 ± 12.52.1 ± 0.80.11
After surgery5.0 ± 6.66.0 ± 3.10.92
IL-10, pg/mLBefore surgery4.4 ± 5.33.0 ± 2.10.442
After surgery4.8 ± 3.83.2 ± 0.30.089
TNF-α, pg/mLBefore surgery3.6 ± 0.33.3 ± 0.30.023*
After surgery3.4 ± 0.34.0 ± 0.60.00*

Abbreviations: GA, general anesthesia group; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-10, interleukin-10; SA, spinal anesthesia group, TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

aValues are expressed as mean ± SD.

bThere was a significant difference between the groups.

Table 4. Comparison of Preoperative and Postoperative Changes in the Serum Cytokine Concentrations Between the Two Groupsa
Cytokines SA Group (N = 15)GA Group (N = 15)P-Value
IL-6, pg/mL-2.6 ± 6.43.9 ± 3.10.005b
IL-10, pg/mL0.4 ± 3.10.2 ± 2.00.53
TNF-α, pg/mL-0.1 ± 0.30.8 ± 0.5< 0.001b

Abbreviations: GA, general anesthesia group; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-10, interleukin-10; SA, spinal anesthesia group, TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

aValues are expressed as mean ± SD.

bThere was a significant difference between the groups.

Table 5. Comparison of Changes in the Cytokine Ratios Between the Two Study Groupsa
CytokinesSA Group (N = 15)GA Group (N = 15)P-Value
TNF-α: IL-10 0.2 ± 1.20.1 ± 0.80.712
IL-6: IL-10 0.8 ± 3.11.6 ± 2.50.569

Abbreviations: GA, general anesthesia group; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-10, interleukin-10; SA, spinal anesthesia group, TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

aValues are expressed as mean ± SD.

5. Discussion

In the current study, we found that the levels of IL-6 and TNF-α significantly increased after surgery compared to their preoperative levels in the GA group in comparison with the SA group. Moreover, the postoperative concentration of TNF-α, as well as changes in the IL-6 level, was significantly higher in the GA group as compared to the SA group. However, changes in the IL-10 levels were not significant throughout the study. We did not find any significant difference in the concentration of IL-10; also, no significant difference was found in the ratio of IL-6 changes to IL-10 changes or TNF-α changes to IL-10 changes between the two groups. The reason may be that the IL-10 level usually rises hours after the operation, while we measured postoperative cytokines only 30 minutes after surgery (12, 17).

Interestingly, Malamitsi-Puchner et al. (15) found that the serum level of IL-6 in pregnant women who had a vaginal delivery was higher than in those with caesarian sections. Their findings may be attributed to the severity of labor pain in parturients with a vaginal delivery. However, their study did not determine whether patients in the vaginal delivery group received analgesia; also, the type of anesthesia used for the caesarian section was not mentioned. It is noteworthy that TNF enhances the production of IL-6 in the amniotic fluid and plasma during labor, which affects the ripening of the cervix, stimulation of uterine contractions, and rupture of the amniotic membrane (18).

Oscan et al. (12) investigated the effects of GA combination with thoracic epidural analgesia on the cytokine response after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. They found that the level of interleukins increased significantly in the epidural saline administered group, compared to patients who received levobupivacaine and fentanyl via an epidural catheter. The IL 6, IL 8, and IL 10 levels started to increase at two hours and returned to the basal level at 24 hours in the groups. The anti-inflammatory effects of local anesthetics may be important in modulating the release of cytokines following regional anesthesia (19).

On the other hand, Buyukkocak et al. (13) found no significant difference in the effects of GA and SA on the IL-6, TNF-α, C-reactive protein (CRP), cortisol, and leptin levels at 24 hours after hemorrhoidectomy as a minor surgery. Similarly, in a study by Zura et al. (20), IL-6 was elevated in both GA and SA groups for transurethral resection of the prostate (without any significant differences), which may indicate the lower level of tissue damage in this type of procedure. GA appears to have little effect on the immune system in healthy cases and patients undergoing short-term minor surgeries; in other words, changes in the immune system are associated with major surgeries (21).

In our previous study (22), we compared the effect of SA versus GA on attenuating the increased cytokine levels in preeclampsia patients undergoing a caesarian section and observed a greater increase in the cytokine level of the GA group compared to the SA group. We suggested that the use of SA for cesarean section in preeclampsia patients may slow the increase in cytokines after surgery. Contradictory to our results, Mohammed Ashery et al. (17) showed that at 30 minutes after anesthesia induction and at four hours postoperatively, the levels of IL-6 and TNF were significantly higher in the SA group compared to the GA group in benign abdominal hysterectomy. The level of anti-inflammatory IL-10 also significantly increased in the GA group at four hours after surgery as compared to the SA group. A probable explanation for our results may be the prohibition of opioid administration before delivery in the GA group.

Moreover, Dermitzaki et al. (23) compared GA with epidural anesthesia in cesarean section. They found that the serum concentration of IL-6 was significantly higher at 24 hours after cesarean section as compared to the corresponding levels immediately before anesthesia, after uterine incision, and before umbilical cord clamping. However, the concentration of IL-6 was similar in both anesthesia techniques. The reason for the discrepancy between our findings and their results could be the better control of postoperative pain in their study. In their study, in the GA group, the surgical incision was infiltrated with ropivacaine, and mothers received intravenous meperidine and paracetamol upon admission to the post-anesthesia care unit. In the epidural group, postoperative analgesia was achieved by combining local anesthetics with narcotics through an epidural catheter.

Besides, Mohammed et al. (24) measured the levels of IL-1β and TNF-α before anesthesia and at 12 and 24 hours postoperatively in the GA and SA groups of women with cesarean section. They revealed that the mean serum level of IL-1β in both groups significantly increased after 12 and 24 hours of anesthesia; however, there were no significant differences between the two anesthesia groups. This study did not provide a clear explanation about GA and regional anesthesia techniques and did not mention the method of postoperative pain control.

Perioperative pain may play an important role in modulating cytokines (25). For example, postoperative analgesic modalities after laparoscopic colorectal surgery attenuated the cytokine response as IL-6 expression (26). Although our patients received 200-mg diclofenac suppositories for postoperative pain management, the pain scores were not assessed at the time of sampling in the recovery room, which may be a limitation of our study. Moreover, measurement of cytokines at 30 minutes after admission to the recovery room may prevent the possible effects of pain and related medications on cytokines.

Another limitation was the measurement of cytokines in both elective and emergency cesarean patients; therefore, some women entered the operating room after enduring labor pain, which might have affected the production of cytokines. It might also be the reason for heterogeneity in the SD of cytokine levels in our study. Therefore, further studies are needed to investigate the effect of perioperative analgesia on cytokine release using both anesthesia methods. It is also recommended to evaluate the level of cytokines in women who endure labor pain before surgery in future studies. Another limitation of this study was that the serum levels of cytokines were measured once in the recovery room due to budget restrictions and staff shortage.

In conclusion, the concentrations of IL-6 and TNF-α were significantly lower in the SA group as compared to the GA group in healthy parturients after cesarean section. Therefore, we suggest SA as a better option for women undergoing cesarean section.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Hsing CH, Wang JJ. Clinical implication of perioperative inflammatory cytokine alteration. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2015;53(1):23-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2015.03.002. [PubMed: 25837846].

  • 2.

    Helmy SA, Wahby MA, El-Nawaway M. The effect of anaesthesia and surgery on plasma cytokine production. Anaesthesia. 1999;54(8):733-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00947.x. [PubMed: 10460524].

  • 3.

    Desborough JP. The stress response to trauma and surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85(1):109-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/85.1.109. [PubMed: 10927999].

  • 4.

    Sheeran P, Hall GM. Cytokines in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78(2):201-19. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.2.201. [PubMed: 9068342].

  • 5.

    Kvarnstrom AL, Sarbinowski RT, Bengtson JP, Jacobsson LM, Bengtsson AL. Complement activation and interleukin response in major abdominal surgery. Scand J Immunol. 2012;75(5):510-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2012.02672.x. [PubMed: 22229650].

  • 6.

    Song J, Park DW, Moon S, Cho HJ, Park JH, Seok H, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of interleukin-6, pentraxin 3, and procalcitonin levels among sepsis and septic shock patients: a prospective controlled study according to the Sepsis-3 definitions. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):968. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4618-7. [PubMed: 31718563]. [PubMed Central: PMC6852730].

  • 7.

    Veenhof AA, Vlug MS, van der Pas MH, Sietses C, van der Peet DL, de Lange-de Klerk ES, et al. Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard perioperative care: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2012;255(2):216-21. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824336e2. [PubMed: 22241289].

  • 8.

    Hojyo S, Uchida M, Tanaka K, Hasebe R, Tanaka Y, Murakami M, et al. How COVID-19 induces cytokine storm with high mortality. Inflamm Regen. 2020;40:37. doi: 10.1186/s41232-020-00146-3. [PubMed: 33014208]. [PubMed Central: PMC7527296].

  • 9.

    Papa A, Di Dato MT, Buonavolonta P, Saracco E, Salzano AM, Casale B. Clinical Management of Il-6 Driven Cytokine Storm Related to COVID-19 in a Patient with Recent Spinal Cord Stimulator Implants: A Case Report. Anesth Pain Med. 2020;10(4). e104151. doi: 10.5812/aapm.104151. [PubMed: 33134148]. [PubMed Central: PMC7539055].

  • 10.

    Safari F, Sezari P, Mottaghi K, Isfahani BT, Nashibi M. A comparative study of influence of isoflurane and propofol on IL1, IL6, TNF serum levels after craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumors. J Cell Mol Anesth. 2019;4(1):8-14.

  • 11.

    Moshari M, Malek B, Ebrahimpour A, Vosoughian M, Dahi-Taleghani M, Ghorbani E, et al. Epidural Anesthesia with Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine, Versus Lidocaine Alone on Plasma Levels of IL-6 in Patients with Proximal Femoral Fracture. J Cell Mol Anesth. 2018;3(3):103-7.

  • 12.

    Ozcan S, Ozer AB, Yasar MA, Erhan OL. Effects of combined general anesthesia and thoracic epidural analgesia on cytokine response in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Niger J Clin Pract. 2016;19(4):436-42. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.183308. [PubMed: 27251956].

  • 13.

    Buyukkocak U, Caglayan O, Daphan C, Aydinuraz K, Saygun O, Agalar F. Similar effects of general and spinal anaesthesia on perioperative stress response in patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy. Mediators Inflamm. 2006;2006(1):97257. doi: 10.1155/MI/2006/97257. [PubMed: 16864910]. [PubMed Central: PMC1570390].

  • 14.

    Kozhimannil KB, Law MR, Virnig BA. Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals; reducing variation may address quality and cost issues. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(3):527-35. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1030. [PubMed: 23459732]. [PubMed Central: PMC3615450].

  • 15.

    Malamitsi-Puchner A, Protonotariou E, Boutsikou T, Makrakis E, Sarandakou A, Creatsas G. The influence of the mode of delivery on circulating cytokine concentrations in the perinatal period. Early Hum Dev. 2005;81(4):387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2004.10.017. [PubMed: 15814224].

  • 16.

    Takacs P, Green KL, Nikaeo A, Kauma SW. Increased vascular endothelial cell production of interleukin-6 in severe preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(3):740-4. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.134. [PubMed: 12634650].

  • 17.

    Mohammed Ashrey E, Elwany Bosat B. Impact of Two Different Anesthetic Techniques on Immune Response and Postoperative Pain for Abdominal Hysterectomy. Med J Cairo Univ. 2019;87(12):4363-9. doi: 10.21608/mjcu.2019.78253.

  • 18.

    Haghshenas Mojaveri M, Mohammadzadeh I, Al-Sadat Bouzari Z, Akbarian Rad Z, Haddad G, Alizadeh-Navaei R. The comparison of serum interleukin-6 of mothers in vaginal and elective cesarean delivery. Caspian J Intern Med. 2014;5(4):223-6. [PubMed: 25489434]. [PubMed Central: PMC4247486].

  • 19.

    Cassuto J, Sinclair R, Bonderovic M. Anti-inflammatory properties of local anesthetics and their present and potential clinical implications. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50(3):265-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00936.x. [PubMed: 16480459].

  • 20.

    Zura M, Kozmar A, Sakic K, Malenica B, Hrgovic Z. Effect of spinal and general anesthesia on serum concentration of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Immunobiology. 2012;217(6):622-7. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2011.10.018. [PubMed: 22217966].

  • 21.

    Jafarzadeh A, Hadavi M, Hassanshahi G, Rezaeian M, Vazirinejad R. General Anesthetics on Immune System Cytokines: A Narrative Review Article. Anesth Pain Med. 2020;10(4). e103033. doi: 10.5812/aapm.103033. [PubMed: 33134146]. [PubMed Central: PMC7539048].

  • 22.

    Vosoughian M, Dahi-Taleghani M, Moshari M, Rajaei S, Rajabi S, Taheri F. The Effect of Spinal and General Anesthesia on Cytokine Serum Levels Following Cesarean Section in Preeclampsia. J Cell Mol Anesth. 2018;3(3):89-97. doi: 10.22037/jcma.v3i3.22580.

  • 23.

    Dermitzaki E, Staikou C, Petropoulos G, Rizos D, Siafaka I, Fassoulaki A. A randomized study of maternal serum cytokine levels following cesarean section under general or neuraxial anesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009;18(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2008.07.005. [PubMed: 19026531].

  • 24.

    Mohammed OK, Alabbassi MG, Aldujaili AA, Shakoor DA, Almoossawi MM. Effect of General and Spinal Anesthesia on Some Anti-inflammatory cytokines and cell adhesion molecules of Iraqi Women Undergo Cesarean Section: Comparative Study. J Pharm Sci Res. 2018;10(11):2846-9.

  • 25.

    Salimi A, Sabetkasaei M, Raisi H, Labibi F, Ameli H, Khazaei-Poul Y, et al. Carbamazepine effects on pain management and serum IL-6, IL-10 evaluation in addicted patients undergoing surgery. Eur J Pharmacol. 2017;812:184-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.07.011. [PubMed: 28697991].

  • 26.

    Barr J, Boulind C, Foster JD, Ewings P, Reid J, Jenkins JT, et al. Impact of analgesic modality on stress response following laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a post-hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19(4):231-9. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1270-0. [PubMed: 25715786].

  • Copyright © 2021, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
    COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: