Demographical, Anatomical, Disease-Related, and Occupational Risk Factors for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

AUTHORS

Mohaddeseh Azadvari ORCID 1 , Mayam Haghshomar 2 , Fatemeh Abbasi Feyjani 3 , Hosseinali Abdolrazagh 4 , Seyede Zahra Emami Razavi ORCID 5 , 6 , * , Omid Tayebi 7

1 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sina & Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Students’ Scientific Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Faculty of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran

4 Department of Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

5 Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

6 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

7 Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

How to Cite: Azadvari M, Haghshomar M, Abbasi Feyjani F, Abdolrazagh H, Emami Razavi S Z, et al. Demographical, Anatomical, Disease-Related, and Occupational Risk Factors for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Arch Neurosci. 2021;8(4):e117607. doi: 10.5812/ans.117607.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Archives of Neuroscience: 8 (4); e117607
Published Online: November 10, 2021
Article Type: Research Article
Received: July 14, 2021
Revised: October 7, 2021
Accepted: October 19, 2021
Crossmark
Crossmark
CHECKING
READ FULL TEXT

Abstract

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common focal mononeuropathy. It causes characteristic symptoms, including numbness and paresthesia in hand due to median nerve compression at the wrist.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate CTS prevalence and personal, psychosocial, biomedical, and occupational factors related to it comprehensively, according to scattered publications, without the simultaneous evaluation of all CTS risk factors.

Methods: A total of 345 patients referred to a hand clinic with a complaint of paresthesia in upper extremities and suspected CTS. The patients underwent neurological assessment and electrodiagnostic (EDX) tests to confirm the diagnosis. The demographic information, past medical history, past trauma history, and occupational history of all the patients were recorded and finally analyzed with SPSS software.

Results: Of the patients, 213 (67.1%) met the criteria for CTS, of whom 160 (75%) were female. Females were significantly more affected by CTS than males (P < 0.05). The mean age was higher in the CTS patients (53.80 ± 11.57 years) than in non-patients (42.39 ± 12.31 years, P < 0.001). No statistical relevance was found between CTS prevalence with occupational history, underlying medical conditions, positive Tinel’s and Phalen's tests, and muscle atrophy.

Conclusions: We recognized age and gender as main determinants in developing CTS. We also found that older age was related to higher CTS intensity.

1. Background

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is caused by the compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel. The main symptoms of CTS are pain, numbness, and paresthesia in the median nerve innervation regions, including the thumb, the index finger, and the middle and semi-radial sides of the ring finger (1).

The symptoms usually begin gradually and during the night. The pain may spread to the arm. As the disease progresses, there may be muscle weakness in the hand, and the atrophy of the thumb muscles occurs very late in the disease. In more than half of CTS cases, both hands are affected (2).

Diagnosis is made based on specific signs, symptoms, and physical examination and is usually confirmed by electrodiagnostic (EDX) tests. It is assumed that muscle atrophy in the thumb increases the probability of CTS (3).

About 5% of the population in the United States suffer from CTS. Up to 33% of people with CTS may recover within a year without any specific treatment (4). Although CTS is primarily idiopathic, genetic factors are important determinants in developing CTS (1, 2). Also, several studies have demonstrated various predisposing elements, including individual and occupational factors (3-5). Specific occupations and physical exposures, for instance, typists, tailors, butchers, housekeepers, and hairdressers or, in an overall view, manually performed jobs with extensive grip and vibration exposure, are stimulators of CTS (6-10).

Aging and gender are considered two significant risk factors of CTS, as only 10% of CTS reported cases are under 30 years old, and also it affects women three times more than men between 45 and 60 years of age (11). In addition, other studies have shown that individuals with underlying medical conditions, particularly diabetes, arthritis, hypothyroidism, pregnancy, menopause, history of oral contraceptives usage, alcoholism, smoking, BMI above 25 or obesity, and renal and heart failure, are susceptible to developing CTS (12).

2. Objectives

The information on CTS prevalence and risk factors in the Iranian population is limited. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive and detailed overview of CTS prevalence, its personal, psychosocial, and workplace risk factors, and previous medical conditions related to CTS in Iranian patients. To our best knowledge, there is no simultaneous evaluation of CTS incidence and its complex personal, medical, psychosocial, and occupational risk factors.

3. Methods

We extracted data from clinical records of 345 patients who referred to the hand clinic of the Sina Hospital, Tehran, Iran, with complaints of pain and paresthesia in the upper extremities for six months between September 2020 and February 2021. Demographic information, such as sex, age, and underlying disease, including diabetes, hypothyroidism, muscle force examination, deep tendon reflex examination, Tinel’s and Phalen's tests, and electromyography (EMG), and nerve conduction velocity were examined. Finally, the association was evaluated between CTS prevalence and severity with age, sex, clinical examinations, past medical conditions, and occupation in all the cases.

Clinical assessment and EDX examination were performed by different people to follow a blind protocol.

3.1. Clinical Assessment

A fully trained medical doctor performed the clinical evaluation of the patients. The symptoms included pain, numbness, or tingling in the first three digits, palm and wrist, and positive Phalen's test or Tinel's test.

All the patients completed a questionnaire about demographic information, past medical history (including diabetes mellitus and hypothyroidism), past trauma history, and occupational history.

3.2. EDX Assessment

The EDX study was performed with the NeMus device. It was guaranteed to maintain the patients’ hand temperature above 32°C. A median motor nerve conduction study was performed to record initial latency and baseline to peak amplitude from the center of the Abductor pollicis brevis muscle (active site). The stimulation was given orthodromically in the wrist area, 8 cm above the recording site. Also, a median sensory nerve conduction study was performed to record initial latency and baseline to peak amplitude from the third finger (active site) with antidromic stimulation in the wrist area (14 cm above the recorder) and the palm (7 cm above the recorder). The EDX criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome were identified.

The disease severity based on the EMG findings is as follows: (1) mild: sensory distal latency (DL) > 3.6 ms; (2) medium: sensory DL (SDL) > 3.6 ms and motor DL (MDL) > 4.2 ms, motor amplitude > 5 mv; (3) severe: an absence of sensory or motor wave and a decrease in motor wave amplitude and denervation that may be present on EMG: SDL absent, MDL > 6.5 ms, or motor amplitude < 5.

Inclusion criteria: (1) complaints of paresthesia and pain in the upper extremities, (2) age between 15 - 75 years.

Exclusion criteria: (1) lack of patient consent; (2) history of previous surgery of carpal tunnel syndrome; (3) history of hand trauma.

3.3. Statistical Methods

The analysis process was performed using SPSS statistical software version 24.0 (IBM Corp.). Comparisons between the continuous variables were completed using t-test, whereas the categorical variables were compared using the chi square test. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) using univariate analysis with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

P values equal to 0.05 or less were considered statistically significant.

3.4. Ethics

Due to the confidentiality principle, the patients remained anonymous. No written evidence was removed from the patients' clinical records, and no intervention was performed on them.

4. Results

The study sample comprised 345 participants. Table 1 summarizes the demographic characteristics of the cases. Of 345 subjects, 213 (67.1%) met the criteria for CTS. More precisely, 53 out of 100 males and 160 out of 245 females had CTS. We found that CTS was significantly related to gender and that being a female was a risk factor for CTS (P = 0.38). The mean age of the participants was 49.43 ± 13.08, and the study included predominantly female subjects (N = 245, 71%). The mean age of the 213 CTS patients was 53.80 ± 11.57 years, whereas asymptomatic participants were significantly younger (42.39 ± 12.31 years, P < 0.001).

Table 1. Demographic Data of the Patients
Respondents CharacteristicsTotal (N = 345)Asymptomatic (N = 132)With Clinically Assessed CTS (N = 213)PORCI
Sex0.0380.5990.373 - 0.961
Male1004753
Female24585160
Age; mean ± SD49.43 ± 13.0842.39 ± 12.3153.80 ± 11.57< 0.001
PMH296230.08
DM9180.0890.1960.024 - 1.582

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; PMH, past medical history; DM, diabetes mellitus.

Of the 213 CTS cases, 190 (89.2%) had bilateral involvement, 17 (7.9%) had right hand involvement, and six (2.8%) had left hand involvement.

Of the 345 patients, only four with CTS had positive Phalen's test based on physical examination. However, the Phalen's test results were not statistically associated with the CTS status (P = 0.302). Five patients with CTS had positive Tinel’s test. However, the Tinel’s test results were not significantly related to the CTS status (P = 0.161). Three patients had a reduced force in the hand region (4/5), of whom only one had CTS. In total, muscle force was not related to CTS (P = 0.561). Six patients had bilateral hand muscle atrophy, five had right hand muscle atrophy, and one had left hand muscle atrophy, who were all CTS positive cases. Atrophy and CTS did not retain statistical significance (P = 0.53).

Twenty-nine participants had a history of a previous medical condition including diabetes mellitus (N = 9, 2.6%), trigger finger (N = 9, 2.6%), hypertension (N = 2, 0.6%), rotator cuff tendonitis (N = 2, 0.6%), breast cancer (N = 2, 0.6%), rheumatoid arthritis (N = 1, 0.3%), multiple myeloma (N = 1, 0.3%), hypothyroidism (N = 1, 0.3%), hemangioma (N = 1, 0.3%), and Chiari malformation (N = 1, 0.3%). There was no significant correlation between comorbid conditions and CTS incidence.

Regarding occupational history (Table 2), only 117 patients had consent to share their information. Among these 117 cases, there were 70 housekeepers, 16 shopkeepers, ten secretaries, seven workers, three tailors, two engineers, two hairdressers, two students, two unemployed, one weight lifter, one carpet weaver, and one accountant. We did not find any association between occupational categories and CTS prevalence (P = 0.091).

Table 2. Detailed Occupational Information of the Patients
JobCTS PositiveCTS NegativeTotal
No information 14187228
House-keepers511970
Shop keepers8816
Secretaries6410
Workers527
Engineers022
Tailors123
Hairdressers022
Students022
Unemployed022
Weight lifter101
Carpet weaver101
Accountant101

Moreover, the jobs were categorized into hard, medium, and easy based on the use of hands and fingers. There was no difference in CTS prevalence between the job categories (P = 0.252).

For a more detailed analysis, we divided CTS into three groups by intensity; 64 (30%) patients had severe CTS while 105 (49.3%) and 44 (20.7%) patients had moderate and mild CTS, respectively. CTS intensities appeared to be significantly related with age (0.024), and patients with higher CTS intensity had older ages. There was no statistically significant difference between the CTS intensity subgroups with gender (P = 0.922), Tinel’s test (P = 0.065), Phalen's test (P = 0.232), force (P = 0.145), comorbid conditions (P = 0.543), DM (P = 0.369), occupational history (P = 0.272), and occupational hardship (P = 0.739).

5. Discussion

With 345 participants and 213 confirmed CTS cases, this study identified age and gender as prominent elements of inducing CTS. All patients with CTS in our study were between 40 and 60 years, and around 75% of the subjects suffering from this condition were female.

These results are consistent with previous literature, showing that the highest prevalence of CTS is in the fifth to sixth decades of life (13, 14). It has been reported that age-related physiological changes and exposure to long-term work may cause an increase in CTS prevalence (3). Studies have shown that CTS severity is also associated with aging, and more extreme pathophysiological processes were detected by EDX analysis in the elderly (15); however, a recent study noted that symptoms were more severe and recurrent in younger individuals (16). Although the correlation between CTS prevalence and age is proven, the association between CTS intensity and age is inconsistent. We found that older age was significantly associated with higher CTS intensity. This issue needs to be addressed in future studies to determine if younger CTS patients suffer from greater symptoms and its pathophysiology.

Our results regarding female domination in CTS are compatible with several previous studies. Statistics show that women suffer from this problem almost three to four times more than men (17, 18). This discrepancy was previously explained by females' genetics and their hand and wrist anthropometric features (19).

Despite the lack of statistical relevance between CTS prevalence with intensity and occupational history in our study, the role of manual activities cannot be underestimated in CTS occurrence. Repetitive wrist movement is a known risk factor for CTS. We had limited information about the patients’ occupations, and only 117 individuals shared their occupational status, of whom 70 were housekeepers. A previous study in Iran showed that houseworkers had the highest frequency of CTS among people with different occupations (20). It seems like, with the advancement of technology, housekeeping requires less manual work, and it is no longer a risk for developing CTS. It is an important finding that highlights the role of technology in improving the quality of our lives. As for the rest of the jobs, we had few patients. However, we cannot state that jobs reviewed in this study are not related to CTS despite our insignificant results in this regard. For elucidating this association, each job should be surveyed exclusively with a group of controls to provide a sufficient population.

We noticed that 89% of our cases had bilateral hand involvement. This is concordant with previous literature showing that most reported cases had bilateral CTS manifestations (21). However, CTS occurs more intensely in the dominant hand. According to a recent review, this is due to central nervous system sensitization (22). We did not address the question of whether the dominant hand preceded the other hand regarding CTS symptoms.

According to our physical examination, CTS prevalence and severity were not correlated with Tinel’s and Phalen's tests. In line with our results, another study expressed no significant relationship between clinical findings and electrophysiological CTS severity (21). Some other studies have presented contradictory results and a significant correlation between positive Tinel’s and Phalen's tests with CTS prevalence (18, 23). Future studies are needed to examine this issue with more sensitive tests and a larger population to resolve these controversies.

Total muscle force and hand muscle atrophy did not appear related to CTS in our assessment. Previous findings revealed that thenar atrophy could reflect the severity of CTS (15). However, another study reported thumb abduction strength was not effective enough to measure CTS severity, and their patients did not have detectable muscular atrophy (24). It sounds like with increased public awareness, individuals suffering from paresthesia and numbness seek treatment before serious functional problems and muscle atrophy occur, and early CTS diagnosis and follow-up medical interventions can prevent hand atrophy.

We did not observe any association between underlying diseases and CTS incidence. Since only 13% (29 individuals) of our subjects had PMH, our results do not necessarily rule out the link between PMH and CTS. A limited number of participants with an underlying disease is probably why our results are inconsistent with other articles. A study on the Iranian population mentioned that BMI was 30 to 40 in 52% of patients. Some studies have considered BMI > 29, diabetes, thyroid dysfunction, and rheumatoid arthritis major risks of CTS (20, 25-28). Another study did not find any significant difference between underlying conditions, except for diabetics and obesity, and CTS. Therefore, a large population comparative investigation designed to precisely assess each disease may help find the exact association of the disease with CTS. A future prospective study is needed to examine CTS incidence in subjects with obesity, diabetes, thyroid dysfunction, and rheumatoid arthritis. In case of a significant correlation between CTS incidence and diseases mentioned above, a screening about underlying diseases is needed at the beginning of CTS diagnosis.

As a final point, based on our results, age and gender were two crucial factors in CTS, and underlying occupational risk factors, underlying diseases, positive Tinel’s and Phalen's tests, and muscle atrophy were not correlated with CTS prevalence and intensity. This is an important finding, meaning that most CTS cases were idiopathic. Although this might mean that CTS prevention is still somehow futile, CTS diagnosis can prevent functional problems and lower the cost of surgeries. This highlights the role of CTS screening in all populations. At last, it is better to repeat this research in a larger group of people and investigate the effect of each risk factor more precisely to obtain more accurate results.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Katz JN, Simmons BP. Clinical practice. Carpal tunnel syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(23):1807-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp013018. [PubMed: 12050342].

  • 2.

    Bickel KD. Carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(1):147-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.11.003. [PubMed: 20117319].

  • 3.

    Geoghegan JM, Clark DI, Bainbridge LC, Smith C, Hubbard R. Risk factors in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br. 2004;29(4):315-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.02.009. [PubMed: 15234492].

  • 4.

    Zyluk A. Carpal tunnel syndrome in pregnancy: A review. Pol Orthop Traumatol. 2013;78:223-7. [PubMed: 24104526].

  • 5.

    Mattioli S, Baldasseroni A, Bovenzi M, Curti S, Cooke RM, Campo G, et al. Risk factors for operated carpal tunnel syndrome: A multicenter population-based case-control study. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:343. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-343. [PubMed: 19758429]. [PubMed Central: PMC2761403].

  • 6.

    Lewanska M, Wagrowska-Koski E, Walusiak-Skorupa J. [Etiological factors for developing carpal tunnel syndrome in people who work with computers]. Med Pr. 2013;64(1):37-45. Polish. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893/2013/0005. [PubMed: 23650767].

  • 7.

    Ghasemi F, Gholamizadeh K, Rahmani R, Doosti-Irani A. Prevalence and severity of carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms among Iranian butchers and their association with occupational risk factors: Implications for ergonomic interventions. Work. 2020;66(4):817-25. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203227. [PubMed: 32925141].

  • 8.

    Kilbom Å, Messing K, Thorbjörnsson CB. Women's health at work. Solna, Sweden: Arbetslivsinstitutet Solna; 1998.

  • 9.

    Demiryurek BE, Aksoy Gundogdu A. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome and its correlation with pain amongst female hairdressers. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2018;31(3):333-9. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01068. [PubMed: 29063909].

  • 10.

    Situ J, Lin CM, Qin ZH, Zhu DX, Lin H, Zhang FF, et al. [Features of peripheral nerve injuries in workers exposed to vibration: an analysis of 197 cases]. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2016;34(12):931-4. Chinese. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2016.12.012. [PubMed: 28241684].

  • 11.

    Padua L, Coraci D, Erra C, Pazzaglia C, Paolasso I, Loreti C, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(12):1273-84. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30231-9. [PubMed: 27751557].

  • 12.

    MacDermid JC, Doherty T. Clinical and electrodiagnostic testing of carpal tunnel syndrome: A narrative review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(10):565-88. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2004.34.10.565. [PubMed: 15552704].

  • 13.

    Haghighat A, Khosrawi S, Kelishadi A, Sajadieh S, Badrian H. Prevalence of clinical findings of carpal tunnel syndrome in Isfahanian dentists. Adv Biomed Res. 2012;1:13. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.96069. [PubMed: 23210072]. [PubMed Central: PMC3507010].

  • 14.

    Mondelli M, Giannini F, Giacchi M. Carpal tunnel syndrome incidence in a general population. Neurology. 2002;58(2):289-94. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.2.289. [PubMed: 11805259].

  • 15.

    Blumenthal S, Herskovitz S, Verghese J. Carpal tunnel syndrome in older adults. Muscle Nerve. 2006;34(1):78-83. doi: 10.1002/mus.20559. [PubMed: 16634057]. [PubMed Central: PMC1482734].

  • 16.

    Aghda AK, Asheghan M, Amanollahi A. Comparisons of electrophysiological and clinical findings between young and elderly patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2020;176(5):387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2019.11.001. [PubMed: 31924311].

  • 17.

    Moghtaderi A, Izadi S, Sharafadinzadeh N. An evaluation of gender, body mass index, wrist circumference and wrist ratio as independent risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome. Acta Neurol Scand. 2005;112(6):375-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00528.x. [PubMed: 16281919].

  • 18.

    Ghiasian M, Khazaei M, Daneshyar S, Mazaheri S, Seyed Gheybi SM. [Epidemiological survey of patients with a carpal tunnel syndrome referred to Sina Hospital in Hamedan during 2014-2016]. Feyz Journal of Kashan University of Medical Sciences. 2017;21(5):498-505. Persian.

  • 19.

    Sassi SA, Giddins G. Gender differences in carpal tunnel relative cross-sectional area: A possible causative factor in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016;41(6):638-42. doi: 10.1177/1753193415625404. [PubMed: 26802792].

  • 20.

    Karimi N, Tabrizi N, Moosavi M. [Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome and associated risk factors]. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2017;26(146):179-84. Persian.

  • 21.

    Farzan M, Mazoochy H, Sobhani A, Shajirat Z, Zolfaghari R, Espandar R. Carpal tunnel syndrome and contributing factors in 362 hospitalized patients. Tehran Univ Med J. 2012;70(1).

  • 22.

    Henry BM, Zwinczewska H, Roy J, Vikse J, Ramakrishnan PK, Walocha JA, et al. The Prevalence of Anatomical Variations of the Median Nerve in the Carpal Tunnel: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(8). e0136477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136477. [PubMed: 26305098]. [PubMed Central: PMC4549253].

  • 23.

    Priganc VW, Henry SM. The relationship among five common carpal tunnel syndrome tests and the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Ther. 2003;16(3):225-36. doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(03)00038-3. [PubMed: 12943125].

  • 24.

    Li ZM, Harkness DA, Goitz RJ. Thumb strength affected by carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:320-6. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000181143.93681.0d. [PubMed: 16331021].

  • 25.

    Pourmemari MH, Heliovaara M, Viikari-Juntura E, Shiri R. Carpal tunnel release: Lifetime prevalence, annual incidence, and risk factors. Muscle Nerve. 2018;58(4):497-502. doi: 10.1002/mus.26145. [PubMed: 29665085].

  • 26.

    Solomon DH, Katz JN, Bohn R, Mogun H, Avorn J. Nonoccupational risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(5):310-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00340.x. [PubMed: 10337041]. [PubMed Central: PMC1496575].

  • 27.

    Sharief F, Kanmani J, Kumar S. Risk factors, symptom severity and functional status among patients with carpel tunnel syndrome. Neurol India. 2018;66(3):743-6. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.232351. [PubMed: 29766936].

  • 28.

    Tay LB, Urkude R, Verma KK. Clinical profile, electrodiagnosis and outcome in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: A Singapore perspective. Singapore Med J. 2006;47(12):1049-52. [PubMed: 17139401].

  • Copyright © 2021, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
    COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: