Molecular Detection and Identification of Bacteria in Urine Samples of Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Pregnant Women by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

AUTHORS

Pragya Lakshmi 1 , * , Alok Bharadwaj 1 , Ranjan Kumar Srivastava 2

1 Department of Microbiology, GLA University, Mathura-281406, India

2 Department of Microbiology, Patna Medical College, Patna-800004, India

How to Cite: Lakshmi P , Bharadwaj A , Srivastava R K . Molecular Detection and Identification of Bacteria in Urine Samples of Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Pregnant Women by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing, Arch Clin Infect Dis. Online ahead of Print ; In Press(In Press):e101136. doi: 10.5812/archcid.101136.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases: In Press (In Press); e101136
Published Online: July 7, 2020
Article Type: Research Article
Received: February 2, 2020
Accepted: May 1, 2020
Uncorrected Proof scheduled for 15 (2)
Crossmark
Crossmark
CHECKING
READ FULL TEXT

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify bacteria in urine samples of pregnant women of asymptomatic and symptomatic women by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. This study aims to identify different strains of microbes causing urinary tract infection (UTI).

Methods: In the semi-quantitative culture technique, bacterial isolates such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, and Proteus were subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing followed by BLAST analysis and phylogenetic tree formation. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing was carried out to identify the specific strains of bacteria causing UTI.

Results: According to the BLAST analysis, sample 1 revealed a 100% similarity to E. coli strain U5/41. Likewise, samples 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 exhibited a 100% similarity to Klebsiella aerogenes strain F26, Pseudomonas entomophila strain 2014, Staphylococcus aureus strain NCTC13616, Staphylococcus saprophyticus strain FDAARGOS_355, Proteus mirabilis strain NCTC 11938, respectively.

Conclusions: Six bacterial isolates were analyzed by 16S RNA gene sequencing followed by the construction of a phylogenetic tree construction up to the species level. This method was a valuable tool for cost-effective and accurate diagnosis of an array of uropathogens in both asymptomatic and symptomatic pregnant women.

Copyright © 2020, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Background

Urinary tract infection (UTI) in pregnant women is a common healthcare problem, which is commonly caused by pathogens normally residing in the intestine and genital tract. Occasionally, the diagnosis of UTI is difficult, and many patients are treated based only on signs and symptoms, the error rate was 33%. The microscopy and culture method of diagnosis takes two days for identification and antibiotic sensitivity of bacteria. The patients treated empirically encounter a risk of antimicrobial resistance. The main advantage of molecular diagnosis is identifying the cause within hours up to species level. 16S real-time PCR was narrated by Lehmann et al. using probes specific to a large number of genus/species (1). All bacteria contain the 16S rRNA gene, thereby making the sequencing-based bacterial identification plausible (2). In addition, the 16S rRNA gene comprises variable regions interspersed with nucleotide sequences, which provide a species-specific signature sequence that is the hallmark of bacterial identification. The obtained sequences are compared with the known sequences in the database (3). The method is valuable in the case of a mixture of a wide range of pathogens. Also, it is useful in detecting bacteria that are difficult to grow as well as those in samples obtained from patients’ post-antibiotic treatment. Strain 131 of E. coli has been found to be multi-drug resistant (MDR) (4). Interestingly, MDR ST131 is resistant to fluoroquinolones such as Ciprofloxacin and aminoglycosides like Amikacin and Gentamicin. In hospitalized and community-acquired cases of UTI, strains ST95, 73, 69 of E. coli are frequently isolated and persist in non-extended spectrum beta-lactamase isolates (5). Extra-intestinal pathogenic E. coli, including uropathogenic E. coli, consists of specific phylogenetic groups with different sets of virulence genes and is commonly associated with human diseases.

2. Objectives

This prospective study was carried out in the Department of Microbiology, Patna Medical College, Patna and the Department of Microbiology, GLA University, Mathura. In the following, 16S rRNA gene sequencing was carried out at the BioAxis DNA Research Centre, Hyderabad, India. Urine samples from pregnant women, both asymptomatic and symptomatic, were collected and subjected to screening methods, followed by culture on MacConkey’s media. The antimicrobial sensitivity test was carried out on the nutrient agar.

3. Methods

3.1. DNA Isolation

The isolated bacteria were subjected to DNA isolation using BiopureTM kits (BioAxis DNA Research Centre).

3.2. 16S rRNA Gene PCR

16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR from the DNA isolated above. The primers used for amplification of the gene were as follows:

• Forward 27F – 5’-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3’

• Reverse 1492R– 5’-CGGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3’

The temperature conditions of PCR were: 5 min at 94°C, 60 sec at 94°C in 35 cycles, 45 sec at 53°C, 90 sec at 68°C and 10 min at 68°C. 4°C was set as hold temperature to keep amplicons safe for the next use.

3.3. Electrophoresis

Electrophoresis of the amplified PCR product was done on 1 kb DNA ladder with 1% agarose gel and TAE as a buffer, which was subsequently visualized by staining with ethidium bromide (Figure 1).

3.4. Elution

Purification of the PCR product was done by washing with 70% ethanol and sodium acetate, followed by elution from the gel. Electroelution causes rapid and isolation of large fragments of DNA. The DNA band presented in the gel fragment was excised and dialyzed against the TAE buffer. The DNA was precipitated out by an electric current. For separation of agarose from DNA, agarose used is of low melting point agarose is commonly used as it does not denature the DNA structure. Subsequently, the sample was subjected to sequencing.

3.5. Sanger Sequencing Using Dye Terminators

The PCR amplicon was sequenced on ABI 3730XL automated DNA Sequencer. In this method, different fluorescent markers are used for labeling every dideoxynucleotide in a capillary tube. Different colored bands are produced by DNA fragments of different sizes separated in a capillary tube. For a given size DNA fragment, there is a separate band and, the colors indicate different bases at which termination of the fragment has occurred. The bases represented by short fragments, moved first in the capillary. When the light emitted by the laser falls on the capillary tube, the light emitted by the fluorescent dye was recorded on the detector. The signal from the detector of each colored band was analyzed by the sequencer and appeared on the graph as a peak. Each base had a separate peak.

3.6. BLAST Reference

The assembled DNA sequence was used to carry out BLAST with the nr database from NCBI.

3.7. Phylogenetic Tree Construction

Top ten similar sequences of BLAST were retrieved, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using Clustal omega.

4. Results

The semi quantitative culture technique identified the following bacterial isolates: E. coli, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, and Proteus spp. These were subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and the results are as follows:

4.1. Sequence Obtained for Sample 1

ATGACCAGCAACACTGGAACTGAGACACGGTCCAGA-CTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAGTGGGGAATATTGCACAATG-GGCGCAAGCCTGATGCAGCCATGCNGCGTGTATGAAGAA-GGCCTTCGGGTTGTAAAGTACTTTCAGCGGGGAGGAAGG-GAGTAAAGTTAATACCTTTGCTCATTGACGTTACCCGCA-GAAGAAGCACCGGCTAACTCCGTGCCAGCAGCCGCGGTA-ATACGGAGGGTGCAAGCGTTAATCGGAATTACTGGGCGT-AAAGCGCACGCAGGCGGTTTGTTAAGTCAGATGTGAAAT-CCCCGGGCTCAACCTGGGAACTGCATCTGATACTGGCAA-GCTTGAGTCTCGTAGAGGGGGGTAGAATTCCAGGTGTAG-CGGTGAAATGCGTAGAGATCTGGAGGAATACCGGTGGCG-AAGGCGGCCCCCTGGACGAAGACTGACGCTCAGGTGCGA-AAGCGTGGGGAGCAAACAGGATTAGATACCCTGGTAGTC-CACGCCGTAAACGATGTCGACTTGGAGGTTGTGCCCTTG-AGGCGTGGCTTCCGGANNTAACGCGTTAAGTCGACCGCC-TGGGGAGTACGGCCGCAAGGTTAAAACTCAAATGAATTG-ACGGGGGCCGCACAAGCGGTGGAGCATGTGGTTTAATTC-GATGCAACGCGAAGAACCTTACCTGGTCTTGACATCCAC-GGAAGTTTTCAGAGATGAGAATGTGCCTTCGGGAACCGT-GAGACAGGTGCTGCATGGCTGTCGTCAGCTCGTGTTGTG-AAATGTTGGGTTAAGTCCCGCAACGAGCGCAACCCTTAT-CCTTTGTTGCCA

4.1.1. Inference

The sequence obtained was 100% identical to the partial gene sequence of 16S rRNA of Escherichia coli strain U5/41 (Figures 2 and 3).

BLAST reference of Escherichia coli
Figure 2. BLAST reference of Escherichia coli
Phylogenetic tree of Escherichia coli
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of Escherichia coli

4.2. Sequence for Sample 2

ATGTGCCCAGATGGGATTAGCTAGTAGGTGGGGTAA-TGGCTCACCTAGGCGACGATCCCTAGCTGGTCTGAGAGG-ATGACCAGCCACACTGGAACTGAGACACGGTCCAGACTC-CTACGGGAGGCAGCAGTGGGGAATATTGCACAATGGGCG-CAAGCCTGATGCAGCCATGCCGCGTGTATGAAGAAGGCC-TTCGGGTTGTAAAGTACTTTCAGCGAGGAGGAAGGCGTT-AAGGTTAATAACCTTGGCGATTGACGTTACTCGCAGAAG-AAGCACCGGCTAACTCCGTGCCAGCAGCCGCGGTAATAC-GGAGGGTGCAAGCGTTAATCGGAATTACTGGGCGTAAAG-CGCACGCAGGCGGTCTGTCAAGTCGGATGTGAAATCCCC-GGGCTCAACCTGGGAACTGCATTCGAAACTGGCAGGCTA-GAGTCTTGTAGAGGGGGGTAGAATTCCAGGTGTAGCGGT-GAAATGCGTAGAGATCTGGAGGAATACCGGTGGCGAAGG-CGGCCCCCTGGACAAAGACTGACGCTCAGGTGCGAAAGC-GTGGGGAGCAAACAGGATTAGATACCCTGGTAGTCCACG-CCGTAAACGATGTCGACTTGGAGGTTGTGCCCTTGAGGC-GTGGCTTCCGGAGCTAACGCGTTAAGTCGACCGCCTGGG-GAGTACGGCCGCAAGGTTAAAACTCAAATGAATTGACGG-GGGCCCGCACAAGCGGTGGAGCATGTGGTTTAATTCGAT-GCAACGCGAAGAACCTTACCTACTCTTGACATCCAGAGA-ACTTAGCAGAGATGCTTTGGTGCCTTCGGGAACTCTG

4.2.1. Inference

The sequence obtained was 100% identical to the partial gene sequence of 16S rRNA of Klebsiella aerogenes strain F26 (Figures 4 and 5).

Phylogenetic tree of Klebsiella aerogenes
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of Klebsiella aerogenes

4.3. Sequence for Sample 3

ATGGGCGAAAGCCTGATCCAGCCATGCCGCGTGTGT-GAAGAAGGTCTTCGGATTGTAAAGCACTTTAAGTTGGGA-GGAAGGGCAGTAAGTTAATACCTTGCTGTTTTGACGTTA-CCGACAGAATAAGCACCGGCTAACTCTGTGCCAGCAGCC-GCGGTAATACAGAGGGTGCAAGCGTTAATCGGAATTACT-GGGCGTAAAGCGCGCGTAGGTGGTTCGTTAAGTTGGATG-TGAAAGCCCCGGGCTCAACCTGGGAACTGCATCCAAAAC-TGGCGAGCTAGAGTATGGTAGAGGGTGGTGGAATTTCCT-GTGTAGCGGTGAAATGCGTAGATATAGGAAGGAACACCA-GTGGCGAAGGCGACCACCTGGACTGATACTGACACTGAG-GTGCGAAAGCGTGGGGAGCAAACAGGATTAGATACCCTG-GTAGTCCACGCCGTAAACGATGTCAACTAGCCGTTGGAA-TCCTTGAGATTTTAGTGGCGCAGCTAACGCATTAAGTTG-ACCGCCTGGGGAGTACGGCCGCAAGGTTAAAACTCAAAT-GAATTGACGGGGGCCCGCACAAGCGGTGGAGCATGTGGT-TTAATTCGAAGCAACGCGAAGAACCTTACCAGGCCTTGA-CATGCAGAGAACTTTCCAGAGATGGATTGGTGCCTTCGG-GAACTCTGACACAGGTGCTGCATGGCTGTCGTCAGCTCG-TGTCGTGAGATGTTGGGTTAAGTCCCGTAACGAGCGCAA-CCCTTGTCCTTAGTTACCAGCACGTTATGGTGGGCACTC-TAAGGAGACTGCCGGTGACAAACCGGAGGAAGGTGGGGA-TGACGTCAAGTCATCATGGCCCTTACGGCCTGGGCTACA-CACGTGCTACAATGGTC

4.3.1. Inference

The sequence obtained was 100% identical to Pseudomonas entomophila strain 2014 (Figures 6 and 7).

Phylogenetic tree of Pseudomonas entomophila
Figure 7. Phylogenetic tree of Pseudomonas entomophila

4.4. Sequence for Sample 4

ATGGGCGAAAGCCTGACGGAGCAACGCCGCGTGAGT-GATGAAGGTCTTCGGATCGTAAAACTCTGTTATTAGGGA-AGAACATATGTGTAAGTAACTGTGCACATCTTGACGGTA-CCTAATCAGAAAGCCACGGCTAACTACGTGCCAGCAGCC-GCGGTAATACGTAGGTGGCAAGCGTTATCCGGAATTATT-GGGCGTAAAGCGCGCGTAGGCGGTTTTTTAAGTCTGATG-TGAAAGCCCACGGCTCAACCGTGGAGGGTCATTGGAAAC-TGGAAAACTTGAGTGCAGAAGAGGAAAGTGGAATTCCAT-GTGTAGCGGTGAAATGCGCAGAGATATGGAGGAACACCA-GTGGCGAAGGCGACTTTCTGGTCTGTAACTGACGCTGAT-GTGCGAAAGCGTGGGGATCAAACAGGATTAGATACCCTG-GTAGTCCACGCCGTAAACGATGAGTGCTAAGTGTTAGGG-GGTTTCCGCCCCTTAGTGCTGCAGCTAACGCATTAAGCA-CTCCGCCTGGGGAGTACGACCGCAAGGTTGAAACTCAAA-GGAATTGACGGGGACCCGCACAAGCGGTGGAGCATGTGG-TTTAATTCGAAGCAACGCGAAGAACCTTACCAAATCTTG-ACATCCTTTGACAACTCTAGAGATAGAGCCTTCCCCTTC-GGGGGACAAAGTGACAGGTGGTGCATGGTTGTCGTCAGC-TCGTGTCGTGAGATGTTGGGTTAAGTCCCGCAACGAGCG-CAACCCTTAAGCTTAGTTGCCATCATTAAGTTGGGCACT-CT

4.4.1. Inference

The sequence obtained was 100% identical to Staphylococcus aureus strain NCTC13616 (Figures 8 and 9).

BLAST reference of Staphylococcus aureus
Figure 8. BLAST reference of Staphylococcus aureus
Phylogenetic tree of Staphylococcus aureus
Figure 9. Phylogenetic tree of Staphylococcus aureus

4.5. Sequence for Sample 5

TTTATGGAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAGGATGAACGC-TGGCGGCGTGCCTAATACATGCAAGTCGAGCGAA

CAGATAAGGAGCTTGCTCCTTTGACGTTAGCGGCGG-ACGGGTGAGTAACACGTGGGTAACCTACCTATAA

GACTGGGATAACTTCGGGAAACCGGAGCTAATACCG-GATAACATTTGGAACCGCATGGTTCTAAAGTGAA

AGATGGTTTTGCTATCACTTATAGATGGACCCGCGC-CGTATTAGCTAGTTGGTAAGGTAACGGCTTACCA

AGGCGACGATACGTAGCCGACCTGAGAGGGTGATCG-GCCACACTGGAACTGAGACACGGTCCAGACTCCT

ACGGGAGGCAGCAGTAGGGAATCTTCCGCAATGGGC-GAAAGCCTGACGGAGCAACGCCGCGTGAGTGATG

AAGGGTTTCGGCTCGTAAAACTCTGTTATTAGGGAA-GAACAAATGTGTAAGTAACTGTGCACGTCTTGAC

GGTACCTAATCAGAAAGCCACGGCTAACTACGTGCC-AGCAGCCGCGGTAATACGTGTGGCAAGCGTTATC

CGGAATTATTGGGCGTAAAGCGCGCGTAGGCGGTTT-CTTAAGTCTGATGTGAAAGCCCACGGCTCAACCG

TGGAGGGTCATTGGAAACTGGGCTTGAGTGCAGAAG-AGGAAAGTGGAATTCCATGTGTAGCGGTGAAATG

CGCAGAGATATTAGTGGAGGAACACCAGTGGCGAAG-GCGACTTTCTGGTCTGTAACTGACGCTGATGTGC

GAAAGCGTGGGGATCAAACAGGATTAGATACCCTGG-TAGTCCACGCCGTAAACGATGAGTGCTAAGTGTT

AGGGGGTTTCCGCCCCTTAGTGCTGCAGCTAACGCA-TTAAGCACTCCGCCTGGGGAGTACGACCGCAAGG

TTGAAACTCAAAGGAATTGACGGGGACCCGCACAAG-CGGTGGAGCATGTGGTTTAATTCGAAGCAACGCG

AAGAACCTTACCAAATCTTGATGAAAACTCTAGAGA-TAGAGCCTTCCCCTTC

4.5.1. Inference

The sequence obtained was 98.47% identical to Staphylococcus saprophyticus strain FDAARGOS_355 (Figures 10 and 11).

BLAST reference of Staphylococcus saprophyticus
Figure 10. BLAST reference of Staphylococcus saprophyticus
Phylogenetic tree of Staphylococcus saprophyticus
Figure 11. Phylogenetic tree of Staphylococcus saprophyticus

4.6. Sequence for Sample 6

TGGGGTTGATCATGGCTCAGATTGAACGCTGGCGGC-AGGCCTAACACATGCAAGTCGAGCGGTAACAGGA

GAAAGCTTGCTTTCTTGCTGACGAGCGGCGGACGGG-TGAGTAATGTATGGGGATCTGCCCGATAGAGGGG

GATAACTACTGGAAACGGTGGCTAATACCGCATAAT-GTCTACGGACCAAAGCAGGGGCTCTTCGGACCTT

GCACTATCGGATGAACCCATATGGGATTAGCTAGTA-GGTGGGGTAAAGGCTCACCTAGGCGACGATCTCT

AGCTGGTCTGAGAGGATGATCAGCCACACTGGGACT-GAGACACGGCCCAGACTCTACGGGAGGCAGCAGT

GGGGAATATTGCACAATGGGCGCAAGCCTGATGCAG-CCATGCCGCGTGTATGAAGAAGGCCTTAGGGTTG

TAAAGTACTTTCAGCGGGGAGGAAGGTGATAAGGTT-AATACCCTTGTCAATTGACGTTACCCGCAGAAGA

AGCACCGGCTAACTCCGTGCCAGCAGCCGCGGTAAT-ACGGAGGGTGCAGGCGTTAATCGGAATTACTGGG

CGTAAAGCGCACGCAGGCGGTCAATTAAGTCAGATG-TGAAAGCCCCGAGCTTAACTTGGGAATTGCATCT

GAAACTGGTTGGCTAGAGTCTTGTAGAGGGGGGTAG-AATTCCATGTGTAGCGGTGAAATGCGTAGAGATG

TGGAGGAATACCGGTGGCGAAGGCGGCCCCCTGGAC-AAAGACTGACGCTCAGGTGCGAAAGCGTGGGGAG

CAAACAGGATTAGATACCCTGGTAGTCCACGCTGTA-AACGATGTCGATTTAGAGGTTGTGGTCTTGAACC

GTGGCTTCTGGAGCTAACGCGTTAAATCGACCGCCT-GGGGAGTACGGCCGCAAGGTTAAAACTCAAATGA

ATTGACGGGGGCCCGCACAAGCGGTGGAGCATGTGG-TTTAATTCGATGCAATGCGAAGAACCTTACCTAC

TCTTGACATCCAGCGAATCCTTTAGAGATAGAGGAG-TGCCTTCGGGAACGCTGAGACAGGTGCTGCATGG

CTGTCGTCAGCTCGTGTTGTGAAATGTTGGGTTAAG-TCCCGCAACGAGCGCAACCCTTATCCTTTGTTGC

CAGCACGTAATGGTGGGAACTCAAAGGAGACTGCCG-GTGATAAACCGGAGGAAGGTGGGGATGACGTCAA

GTCATCATGGCCCTTACGAGTAGGGCTACACACGTG-CTACAATGGCAGATACAAAGAGAAGCGACCTCGC

GAGAGCAAGCGGAACTCATAAAGTCTGTCGTAGTCC-GGATTGGAGTCTGCAACTCGACTCCATGAAGTCG

GAATCGCTAGTAATCGTAGATCAGAATGCTACGGTG-AATACGTTCCCGGGCCTTGTACACACCGCCCGTC

ACACCATGGGAGTGGGTTGCAAAAGAAGTAGGTAGC-TTAACCTTCGGGAGGGCGCTTACCACTTTGTGAT

TCATGACTGGGGTGAAGTCGTAACAAGGTAACC

4.6.1. Inference

The sequence obtained was 100% identical to the partial gene sequence of 16S rRNA of Proteus mirabilis strain NCTC 11938 (Figures 12 and 13).

Phylogenetic tree of Proteus mirabilis
Figure 13. Phylogenetic tree of Proteus mirabilis

5. Discussion

In the present study, a comprehensive molecular characterization of six bacterial isolates was carried out. We observed that the sequence in sample 1 was 100% identical to the partial gene sequence of 16S rRNA of E. coli strain U5/41. Phylogenetically strains included U5/41, E. fergusonii strain ATCC35469, E. fergusonii strain NBRC102419, E. coli strain JCM1649, E. fergusonii strain ATCC35469, Shigella flexneri strain ATCC29903, E. coli strain NBRC102203, Shigella boydii strain P288, Shigella sonnei strain CECT4887, and Brenneriaalni strain pvfi20. Campos et al. also conducted a study in Brazil, of E. coli isolated from urine samples of hospitalized patients and identified strains 131 and 69 as the most frequently found E. coli strains (6). Strain 69 was found to be associated with both community-acquired and healthcare-associated UTIs (7). The MDR manner of these strains was attributed due to the dfrA17-aadA5 gene, which makes these strains resistant to Trimethoprim, aminoglycosides. The other ST groups identified by Campos et al. included ST648, ST405, ST73, and ST10.

The sequence of sample 2 was 100% identical to that of the partial gene sequence of 16S rRNA of Klebsiella aerogenes strain F26. The phylogenetically identified strains were F26, K. aerogenes strain NCTC10006, K. aerogenes strain NCTC10006, K. aerogenes strain FDAARGOS_513 chromosome, K. aerogenes strain CB46l, K. aerogenes strain FDAARGOS_327 chromosome, K. aerogenes strain DAS43, K. aerogenes strain gol2, K. aerogenes strain NCTC9735, and K. aerogenes strain CX-122.

In sample 3, the sequence was 100% identical to that of Pseudomonas entomophila strain 2014. The phylogenetically identified strains were P. entomophila strain 2014, P. entomophila strain 1257 chromosome, Bacterium strain E70 16S ribosomal RNA gene, P. putida strain CK223, P. spp strain AZ5, P. guariconensis strain njensis, P. spp strain BYT-1, P. spp WCHPs060039, P. guariconensis strain MR149, and P. guariconensis strain MR144.

In sample 4, the sequence was 100% identical to that of Staphylococcus aureus strain NCTC13616. Phylogenetically identified strains included S. aureus strain NCTC13616, S. aureus strain NCTC4163, S. aureus strain NCTC11965, S. aureus strain NCTC4137, S. aureus strain NCTC9555, S. aureus strain NCTC5660, S. aureus strain NCTC7121, S. aureus strain NCTC13142, S. aureus strain NCTC12233, S. aureus strain NCTC13552.

In sample 5, the strain identified was Staphylococcus saprophyticus strain FDAARGOS_355. The other phylogenetically identified strains were S. saprophyticus strain FDAARGOS_355, S. saprophyticus strain FDAARGOS_137, S. saprophyticus sub spp. saprophyticus ATCC 15305, S. saprophyticus strain RJ17, S. saprophyticus sub spp. saprophyticus ATCC 15305, Staphylococcus spp. S04009, S. saprophyticus sub spp. saprophyticus strain NCTC7666, S. saprophyticus strain FDAARGOS_336, S. spp 82B, S. saprophyticus strain BVC51.

The sequence of the sample was 100% identical to that of the partial gene sequence of 16S rRNA of Proteus mirabilis strain NCTC 11938. The phylogenetically identified strains were P. mirabilis strain NCTC 11938, P. mirabilis strain PmSC1111, P. mirabilis strain NCTC4199, P. mirabilis strain AR_0029, P. mirabilis strain AR379, P. mirabilis isolate GN2, P. mirabilis strain AR_0156, P. mirabilis strain AR_0159, P. mirabilis strain AR_0059, and P. mirabilis strain AOUC-001.

Jenkins et al. obtained pus samples and joint fluids from 23 patients using 1,343 bp PCR. Of 38 samples using 762/598 bp PCR, 33 samples were negative by both culture and PCR. Moreover, 16S rDNA was identified in 8/17 culture-positive samples (8). The bacteria identified were S. aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus viridians, Prevotella pleuritidis, and Prevotella oulorum. Gene sequencing helped in identifying anaerobes in samples positive on culture. As the Gram-positive cell wall is disrupted readily during the extraction process, it is not identified as easily as Gram-negative bacteria (9-12). However, Jenkins et al. found that for both Gram-negative and -positive bacteria, there was no bias as they could not be identified by PCR (8).

Van der Zee et al. demonstrated that PCR-based detection can replace the culture-based diagnosis except in the case of antibiotic sensitivity testing that might be essential for the adequate treatment of patients. These results were confirmed by 16S PCR. However, the limitation of this study was that only a few strains were tested, and hence, the presence and homology of target genes need further substantiation (13).

Tajbakhsh et al. isolated and detected Gram-negative bacteria, causing UTI in patients from Shahrekord Hospitals, Iran. The study used PCR, which was found to be an effective method for diagnosis of bacteria causing UTI, especially Gram-negative ones and also other infections (14).

Abulmeshah carried out a study to identify organisms causing UTI by doing 16S rRNA gene sequencing and BLAST analysis and found that E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. aureus, P. mirabilis and P. aeruginosa were the most prevalent organisms (15).

5.1. Conclusions

Six bacterial isolates were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, followed by the construction of a phylogenetic tree formation up to the species level. This method was a valuable tool for a cost-effective and accurate diagnosis of an array of uropathogens in both asymptomatic and symptomatic pregnant women. If the samples presented MDR on sensitivity testing, the specific strain isolated by PCR would provide guidelines for the management of UTI in pregnant women in the future.

Acknowledgements

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Lehmann LE, Hauser S, Malinka T, Klaschik S, Stuber F, Book M. Real-time polymerase chain-reaction detection of pathogens is feasible to supplement the diagnostic sequence for urinary tract infections. BJU Int. 2010;106(1):114-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09017.x. [PubMed: 19874298].

  • 2.

    Clarridge J3. Impact of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for identification of bacteria on clinical microbiology and infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17(4):840-62. table of contents. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.840-862.2004. [PubMed: 15489351]. [PubMed Central: PMC523561].

  • 3.

    Woese CR. Bacterial evolution. Microbiol Rev. 1987;51(2):221-71. [PubMed: 2439888]. [PubMed Central: PMC373105].

  • 4.

    Ben Zakour NL, Alsheikh-Hussain AS, Ashcroft MM, Khanh Nhu NT, Roberts LW, Stanton-Cook M, et al. Erratum for Ben Zakour et al., Sequential Acquisition of Virulence and Fluoroquinolone Resistance Has Shaped the Evolution of Escherichia coli ST131. mBio. 2016;7(3). doi: 10.1128/mBio.00958-16. [PubMed: 27353762]. [PubMed Central: PMC4937219].

  • 5.

    Doumith M, Day M, Ciesielczuk H, Hope R, Underwood A, Reynolds R, et al. Rapid identification of major Escherichia coli sequence types causing urinary tract and bloodstream infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(1):160-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02562-14. [PubMed: 25355761]. [PubMed Central: PMC4290915].

  • 6.

    Campos ACC, Andrade NL, Ferdous M, Chlebowicz MA, Santos CC, Correal JCD, et al. Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Escherichia coli Isolates from Urine Samples of Hospitalized Patients in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:243. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00243. [PubMed: 29503639]. [PubMed Central: PMC5821075].

  • 7.

    Riley LW. Pandemic lineages of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(5):380-90. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12646. [PubMed: 24766445].

  • 8.

    Jenkins C, Ling CL, Ciesielczuk HL, Lockwood J, Hopkins S, McHugh TD, et al. Detection and identification of bacteria in clinical samples by 16S rRNA gene sequencing: comparison of two different approaches in clinical practice. J Med Microbiol. 2012;61(Pt 4):483-8. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.030387-0. [PubMed: 22160310].

  • 9.

    Harris KA, Hartley JC. Development of broad-range 16S rDNA PCR for use in the routine diagnostic clinical microbiology service. J Med Microbiol. 2003;52(Pt 8):685-91. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.05213-0. [PubMed: 12867563].

  • 10.

    Schuurman T, de Boer RF, Kooistra-Smid AM, van Zwet AA. Prospective study of use of PCR amplification and sequencing of 16S ribosomal DNA from cerebrospinal fluid for diagnosis of bacterial meningitis in a clinical setting. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(2):734-40. doi: 10.1128/jcm.42.2.734-740.2004. [PubMed: 14766845]. [PubMed Central: PMC344470].

  • 11.

    Rantakokko-Jalava K, Nikkari S, Jalava J, Eerola E, Skurnik M, Meurman O, et al. Direct amplification of rRNA genes in diagnosis of bacterial infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2000;38(1):32-9.

  • 12.

    Welinder-Olsson C, Dotevall L, Hogevik H, Jungnelius R, Trollfors B, Wahl M, et al. Comparison of broad-range bacterial PCR and culture of cerebrospinal fluid for diagnosis of community-acquired bacterial meningitis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13(9):879-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01756.x. [PubMed: 17608746].

  • 13.

    van der Zee A, Roorda L, Bosman G, Ossewaarde JM. Molecular Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections by Semi-Quantitative Detection of Uropathogens in a Routine Clinical Hospital Setting. PLoS One. 2016;11(3). e0150755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150755. [PubMed: 26954694]. [PubMed Central: PMC4783162].

  • 14.

    Tajbakhsh E, Tajbakhsh S, Khamesipour F. Isolation and Molecular Detection of Gram Negative Bacteria Causing Urinary Tract Infection in Patients Referred to Shahrekord Hospitals of Iran. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2015;17(5). doi: 10.5812/ircmj.17(5)2015.24779.

  • 15.

    Abulmeshah MA. Bacterial isolates and drug susceptibility patterns of urinary tract infection among pregnant and non-pregnant women. Faculty of Health sciences Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences; 2016.

  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: