Studying the Relation Between Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome and Anatomic and Anthropometric Characteristics of Military Male Personnel


Vahid Sobhani 1 , Abolfazl Shakibaee 1 , * , Amidoddin Khatibi Aghda 2 , Mohammad Kazem Emami Meybodi 3 , Abbasali Delavari 4 , Dariush Jahandideh 1

1 Exercise Physiology Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran

2 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran

3 Orthopedic Department, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran

4 Emergency Medicine Department, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran

How to Cite: Sobhani V, Shakibaee A, Khatibi Aghda A, Emami Meybodi M K, Delavari A, et al. Studying the Relation Between Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome and Anatomic and Anthropometric Characteristics of Military Male Personnel, Asian J Sports Med. 2015 ; 6(2):e23811. doi: 10.5812/asjsm.23811.


Asian Journal of Sports Medicine: 6 (2); e23811
Published Online: June 20, 2015
Article Type: Research Article
Received: January 1, 2014
Accepted: May 20, 2014


Background: Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome (MTSS) is common among military recruits and to our knowledge; the factors that might put the military recruits at higher risk of incidence of MTSS are not well known.

Objectives: This study was done to investigate the association between some anthropometric and anatomical factors and the prevalence of MTSS among military recruits.

Patients and Methods: One hundred and eighty one randomly selected military recruits were included in this cross sectional study. Using history taking and physical examinations they were tested for MTSS. Accordingly the subjects were assigned to the case (those with MTSS) and control groups (normal healthy subjects). Using standard guidelines, the anthropometric and anatomical criteria of the subjects were measured. The correlation between the measurements and the prevalence of MTSS was tested using statistical analysis.

Results: Data of all the 181 subjects with the mean age of 30.7 ± 4.68 years were Included in the final analysis. The prevalence of MTSS was found to be 16.6% (30 people). Internal and external rotation range of motion, iliospinale height, the score of navicular drop test, and the trochanteric tibial lateral length were significantly different between healthy subjects and patients with MTSS (P < 0.05).

Discussion: The prevalence of MTSS was relatively lower in this study comparing to other studies on military personnel. It was not probably due to type of military shoes or exercise area surface (none of them were standardized); it could be due to low intensity trainings and the long intervals between training sessions.

1. Background

Medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS) is a very common injury to lower leg in both athletic and military populations (1); with an incidence rate between 4% and 35% reported in the past four decades (2-4). MTSS is a common exercise induced injury that causes a tender and painful area in the distal two-third of the posterior medial edge of tibia, the pain is relieved with rest but it reappears with exercise (5, 6). So far, the characteristic signs and symptoms of MTSS are fully defined, but the pathophysiology of this disorder is not exactly known. Most of previous studies define MTSS as an inflammation in posterior medial edge of tibia due to repeated tension to lower extremity and bone overload (7). Other theories suggest periostalgia (8), periostaitis (9, 10), bone stress reaction (11-14), and low bone mineral density (15, 16). There are also different theories to describe the pathomechanism of this syndrome; Sommer and Vallentyne proposed pronation of foot at subtalar joint due to a varus malformation induced by posterior tibialis tightness or peroneus longus weakness as a cause for MTSS (17). Viitasalo and Kvist found out that over-inversion/eversion of subtalar joint and also significant increase in calcaneal angles is present in people with MTSS (18). Raissi et al. (19) and Bennett et al. (3) in separate studies revealed that navicular drop test is related to MTSS and this syndrome is more prevalent in females. White and Yates showed that those with MTSS have less dorsiflexion due to tightness of soleus and gastrocnemius muscles (4); Beck and colleagues used the same theory to explain tibial bending by sharpy’s fibers that leads to MTSS (5). Moen et al. reported that higher internal rotation range, more plantar flexion and positive navicular drop test are related to prevalence of MTSS while higher BMI just prolongs recovery time (20). Bouche and Johnson studied pathomechanics of MTSS and reported that tension introduced to deep crural fascia due to contraction of posterior compartment muscles is the reason of MTSS (21). Bartosik et al. revealed that limb length disparency might be responsible for MTSS. The shorter side could have foot equinus, hip joint drop, over-extension of knee joint, while the longer side might have over-flexion of hip and knee joint, and over-pronation at subtalar joint (22). The same study showed that those with MTSS have lower ankle dorsiflexion. Messier and Pittala showed that in those with MTSS foot pronation and the speed of this action both are increased (23). MTSS is one of the most common injuries between military recruits (4). Different studies have shown different associations and risk factors such as over-pronation of midfoot (4), high BMI (24), female gender, lower calf girth, increased internal and external rotation (25), and higher range of plantar flexion (26). These risk factors are not the same in all the studies and there is contradiction. Imaging studies of MTSS with MRI have shown a high signal line in posterior edge of tibia in MTSS patients (27). Thacker and colleagues showed that strengthening soleus, controlling over-pronation, using appropriate insole, and low tension exercise can help preventing MTSS (28). It is reported that patients with MTSS have lower bone density compared to normal subjects (15), it is also shown that after treatment of MTSS bone density was normal again (16); so it could be the cause or result of MTSS.

2. Objectives

Since factors inducing MTSS are not fully known based on the previous studies and also the pathomechanical theories that are already presented, it was needed that we study anthropometric and anatomic factors and their relations with MTSS in military recruits, a population in which MTSS is reported to be high.

3. Patients and Methods

In this retrospective cross-sectional study 200 male military personnel were randomly selected from an expert training brigade. Nineteen subjects with previous history of lower extremity fracture or surgery were excluded from the study which left us 181 subjects to perform the study on. All the subjects were informed about the study and they signed the written consent form. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Baqiatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Diagnostic criteria for MTSS were based on the description by Yates and White that includes a pain history which is induced by exercise and lasts for a couple of hours to several days after exercise. This pain is located on the distal two-thirds of posteromedial border of tibia. The patient must not have any history of paresthesia or neurovascular symptoms. The pain must cover an area of at least 5cm and palpation of this area could cause a diffuse vague pain. The measures were taken two times with a one-weak interval; the mean of these two measurements was recorded for each parameter. Demographic data of each subject (age, weight, and height) were collected by four skilled examiners (with an average of 4 years of experience). Weight was measured by a digital Seca scale (Germany, 100 grams accuracy) with light clothing and bare feet. Height was measured with Seca stadiometer (Germany, to the nearest 0.1 cm) with bare feet. Then the patient was examined by an experienced sports medicine specialist in order to gather the following data based on the studies by Moen et al. and Raissi et al. All angles were measured by one goniometer and all static measurements of lower extremity were taken using a tape meter to the nearest 0.5 cm. Leg length discrepancy: using a tape meter (nearest 0.5 cm), lower extremity length was measured from the anterior superior iliac spine to the most prominent part of medial malleolus (7, 19). Hip range of motion: the subject was in sitting position with knee and hip joints flexed at 90°; hip joint was rotated internally and externally to a firm end feel. The angles were measured in degrees relative to the initial position (19). Intercondylar interval: the interval was measured with a gauge (accuracy of 0.1 mm) while the subject was standing upright and the feet were paired and in one direction (19). Quadriceps (Q) angle: the subject was standing with its knee and hip joints extended and quadriceps muscle at rest. The center of goniometer was at patella with lower hand at tibial tubercle (which was found with palpation), and the other hand was toward anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). The angle was measured in degrees (19).

Calf girth: the subject was standing relaxed and upright. Using a tape meter the maximum circumference of the relaxed calf was measured and recorded (20).

Ankle girth: in the same position as for the calf girth measurement, proximal to the internal malleolus, the minimum circumference was measured and recorded (29).

Navicular drop test: while the subject was in a sitting position, with knees flexed at 90° and ankle joint in a neutral position, the tuberosity of navicular bone was marked with a non-toxic marker. Then the individual was asked to stand without changing the position of the foot. The difference between heights of the tuberosity of navicular bone in these two positions was referred as navicular drop and was measured in mm (20).

Iliospinale height, lateral tibial height, and trochanteric-lateral tibial height were measured based on Kinanthropometric Assessments; Guidelines for Athlete Assessment in New Zealand Sport (29).

Body composition: the proportion of fat tissue mass to lean body mass was measured based on bioelectrical impedance analysis method using Tanita BF 350 (Japan).

Intratest reliability: in order to determine the intratest reliability a pilot study was performed (kappa = 0.75). Based on the measurement methods described above, we measured 30 lower extremities of 20 subjects 3 times during one week which were randomly selected; these measurements were blinded to the subjects.

Statistics: Using SPSS software for Windows, version 19 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA), we performed the statistical analyses. Data was expressed as mean ± SD and normal distribution was determined by Kolmogrov-Smirnov method. Then using independent sample test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test data was analyzed. Statistical significance was accepted if P value ≤ 0.05.

4. Results

Of 181 army recruits who were included in this study with a mean age of 30.7 ± 4.68 years, 30 participants (16.6%) were in MTSS group (age: 29.52 ± 3.88 years, height: 173.76 ± 6.57 cm, and weight: 80.20 ± 11.63 kg) and the other 151 participants (83.4%) were in control group (age: 30.26 ± 4.83 years, height: 174.40 ± 7.84 cm, and weight: 83.10 ± 17.48 kg). Factors like lower extremity length, intercondylar interval, Q angle, tibial lateral height, calf girth, ankle girth and fat mass of the subject were measured and analyzed but there were no significant differences between the two groups. There was significant difference in other factors like navicular drop test, internal and external rotation, iliospinale height, and trochanteric tibial lateral length. Mean ± SD of all of the studied factors and also the P values are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Anatomic and Anthropometric Data of MTSS and Control Group
VariableNormal GroupMTSS GroupP Value
Age, y30.26 ± 4.8329.52 ± 3.880.154
Height, cm174.40 ± 7.84173.76 ± 6.580.298
Weight, kg83.10 ± 17.4880.20 ± 11.630.337
Right leg length, cm87.53 ± 3.5488.84 ± 4.290.448
Left leg length, cm87.65 ± 3.5988.91 ± 4.360.463
Intercondylar interval, mm1.08 ± 1.461.29 ± 1.560.475
Q angle, degree14.56 ± 5.8914.51 ± 5.610.809
Hip external rotation, degree45.23 ± 3.3441.42 ± 3.820.000
Hip internal rotation, degree38.80 ± 4.6137.07 ± 2.800.004
Navicular drop test, mm6.24 ± 2.794.22 ± 3.220.015
Iliospinale height, cm51.07 ± 3.0253.14 ± 3.070.017
Trochanteric tibiale lateral height, cm43.22 ± 2.5344.69 ± 1.680.022
Tibiale lateral height, cm45.26 ± 2.6145.80 ± 2.100.360
Calf girth, cm38.01 ± 3.2538.35 ± 3.230.691
Ankle girth, cm22.87 ± 1.5322.83 ± 1.370.575
Body fat mass, percent20.09 ± 5.2719.97 ± 4.830.677
Figure 1. The Difference Between Heights of the Tuberosity of Navicular Bone in Sitting and Standing Positions
Figure 2. The Height of Navicular Tuberosity in Neutral and Relaxed Sitting Position

5. Discussion

Based on this study the prevalence of MTSS in these 181 military recruits was 16.6% (30 participants). Navicular drop test, internal and external rotation, iliospinale height, and trochanteric tibial lateral length were the only five factors that were significantly different btween the two groups. The results of this study were in concordance with those of Raissi et al. (19), Bennett et al. (3), Moen et al. (7) and Yates and White (4). However, the findings of this study about navicular drop test is different from those of Plisky et al. (24), who found no association between navicular drop and MTSS in competitive adult runners. The difference between some findings of this study and the previous ones (and also between the previous ones) might be due to variation in target groups (expert military recruits, runners, female, or male participants) and measurement techniques. Navicular drop test is an indicator of pronation of foot. In our study mean of NDT was significantly lower in MTSS group (NDT: 4.22 ± 3.22 mm) than in control group (NDT: 6.24 ± 2.79 mm); though both were in normal ranges (P value: 0.015). So far, NDT has been investigated in seven studies, five of them found association between positive NDT and MTSS (3, 4, 19, 20, 30), while the other two have found no association (24, 25). We found a significant decrease in range of hip internal and external rotation in association with MTSS in this study (P value: 0.004 and 0.000 respectively). This finding was in agreement with that of Moen et al. (7) and in contrast with Burne et al. (31). No obvious mechanism is established to define the relation between MTSS and hip range of motion. Burne et al. stated a mechanism in which those with increased hip internal range of motion have a specific pattern of running which causes extra load on their tibia that might lead to MTSS. The same pathomechanism might be induced by increased hip external range of motion (31).

In this study there was no association between weight, calf girth, and ankle girth with MTSS (P value: 0.337, 0.691, and 0.575, respectively), despite the results of Hubbard’s study (25). Plisky et al. found that BMI > 20.2 was associated with MTSS (24). Another study found that in those with MTSS lean calf girth was significantly lower in their right leg (P value: 0.044) (20). Moen et al. found a relation between higher BMI and longer time to full recovery (P value: 0.005) (32). We found no significant difference between BMI in the two groups (P value > 0.05); the reason might be that all the personnel involved in this study were in shape and had no significant difference in their BMIs.

In a cohort study on 77 cross country runners in the united states, runners with navicular drop score of more than 10 mm were almost 7 times more likely to incur medial exercise related leg pain (ERLP) than those with with a less than 10mm navicular drop score (OR:6.6, 95% CI = 1.2-38.0) (33). Navicular drop test (NDT) which is a valid measure of foot pronation (26, 34), is defined as the difference between height of navicular tuberosity at neutral position of subtalar joint and its height in relaxed stance. It was measures based on description by Brody et al. (35). Relatively low prevalence rate of MTSS in our target group was not probably due to type of military shoes or exercise area surface (none of them were standardized); it could be due to low intensity trainings and the long intervals between training sessions. One more logical hypothesis was mentioned by Bouche and Johnson as tibial fasciitis, which proposes that this syndrome is due to the tension on the site of deep crural fascia insertion to tibia; that is mainly from posterior compartment muscles especially the soleus muscle (21). One evidence in favor of this theory is that the most effective surgical procedures involve release of the deep posterior compartment, including the soleus sling and removal of a strip of posteromedial tibia periosteum (36). This tension on insertion site of deep crural fascia to tibia caused by posterior compartment muscles could be due to the different growth rate of muscles and deep crural fascia and flexibility of this fascia. Since muscle growth rate is probably more than fascial growth rate and collagen synthesis by fibroblasts, a tension is introduced to deep crural fascia and guided to its insertion site on tibia from posterior compartment muscles; especially in those who have recently started exercise and had no time for adaptation of their deep crural fascia to the relatively rapid growth rate of calf muscles. In this study we found that MTSS is associated with some of the investigated factors but in order to fully understand the pathomechanism of MTSS further research with new methods is needed to investigate the possible risk factors of MTSS among military recruits with focus on the tension induced by hypertrophy of the posterior compartment muscles to insertion site of deep crural fascia.


  • 1.

    Clanton TO, Solcher BW. Chronic leg pain in the athlete. Clin Sports Med. 1994; 13(4) : 743 -59 [PubMed]

  • 2.

    Andrish JT, Bergfeld JA, Walheim J. A prospective study on the management of shin splints. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974; 56(8) : 1697 -700 [PubMed]

  • 3.

    Bennett JE, Reinking MF, Pluemer B, Pentel A, Seaton M, Killian C. Factors contributing to the development of medial tibial stress syndrome in high school runners. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001; 31(9) : 504 -10 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 4.

    Yates B, White S. The incidence and risk factors in the development of medial tibial stress syndrome among naval recruits. Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32(3) : 772 -80 [PubMed]

  • 5.

    Beck BR. Tibial stress injuries. An aetiological review for the purposes of guiding management. Sports Med. 1998; 26(4) : 265 -79 [PubMed]

  • 6.

    Kortebein PM, Kaufman KR, Basford JR, Stuart MJ. Medial tibial stress syndrome. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32(3 Suppl) : S27 -33 [PubMed]

  • 7.

    Moen MH, Tol JL, Weir A, Steunebrink M, De Winter TC. Medial tibial stress syndrome: a critical review. Sports Med. 2009; 39(7) : 523 -46 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 8.

    Detmer DE. Chronic shin splints. Classification and management of medial tibial stress syndrome. Sports Med. 1986; 3(6) : 436 -46 [PubMed]

  • 9.

    Clement DB. Tibial stress syndrome in athletes. J Sports Med. 1974; 2(2) : 81 -5 [PubMed]

  • 10.

    Mubarak SJ, Gould RN, Lee YF, Schmidt DA, Hargens AR. The medial tibial stress syndrome. A cause of shin splints. Am J Sports Med. 1982; 10(4) : 201 -5 [PubMed]

  • 11.

    Johnell O, Rausing A, Wendeberg B, Westlin N. Morphological bone changes in shin splints. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982; (167) : 180 -4 [PubMed]

  • 12.

    Batt ME, Ugalde V, Anderson MW, Shelton DK. A prospective controlled study of diagnostic imaging for acute shin splints. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998; 30(11) : 1564 -71 [PubMed]

  • 13.

    Anderson MW, Ugalde V, Batt M, Gacayan J. Shin splints: MR appearance in a preliminary study. Radiology. 1997; 204(1) : 177 -80 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 14.

    Fredericson M, Bergman AG, Hoffman KL, Dillingham MS. Tibial stress reaction in runners. Correlation of clinical symptoms and scintigraphy with a new magnetic resonance imaging grading system. Am J Sports Med. 1995; 23(4) : 472 -81 [PubMed]

  • 15.

    Magnusson HI, Westlin NE, Nyqvist F, Gardsell P, Seeman E, Karlsson MK. Abnormally decreased regional bone density in athletes with medial tibial stress syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2001; 29(6) : 712 -5 [PubMed]

  • 16.

    Magnusson HI, Ahlborg HG, Karlsson C, Nyquist F, Karlsson MK. Low regional tibial bone density in athletes with medial tibial stress syndrome normalizes after recovery from symptoms. Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31(4) : 596 -600 [PubMed]

  • 17.

    Sommer HM, Vallentyne SW. Effect of foot posture on the incidence of medial tibial stress syndrome. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995; 27(6) : 800 -4 [PubMed]

  • 18.

    Viitasalo JT, Kvist M. Some biomechanical aspects of the foot and ankle in athletes with and without shin splints. Am J Sports Med. 1983; 11(3) : 125 -30 [PubMed]

  • 19.

    Raissi GR, Cherati AD, Mansoori KD, Razi MD. The relationship between lower extremity alignment and Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome among non-professional athletes. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2009; 1(1) : 11 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 20.

    Moen MH, Bongers T, Bakker EW, Zimmermann WO, Weir A, Tol JL, et al. Risk factors and prognostic indicators for medial tibial stress syndrome. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012; 22(1) : 34 -9 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 21.

    Bouche RT, Johnson CH. Medial tibial stress syndrome (tibial fasciitis): a proposed pathomechanical model involving fascial traction. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2007; 97(1) : 31 -6 [PubMed]

  • 22.

    Bartosik KE, Sitler M, Hillstrom HJ, Palamarchuk H, Huxel K, Kim E. Anatomical and biomechanical assessments of medial tibial stress syndrome. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2010; 100(2) : 121 -32 [PubMed]

  • 23.

    Messier SP, Pittala KA. Etiologic factors associated with selected running injuries. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1988; 20(5) : 501 -5 [PubMed]

  • 24.

    Plisky MS, Rauh MJ, Heiderscheit B, Underwood FB, Tank RT. Medial tibial stress syndrome in high school cross-country runners: incidence and risk factors. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007; 37(2) : 40 -7 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 25.

    Hubbard TJ, Carpenter EM, Cordova ML. Contributing factors to medial tibial stress syndrome: a prospective investigation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009; 41(3) : 490 -6 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 26.

    Sell KE, Verity TM, Worrell TW, Pease BJ, Wigglesworth J. Two measurement techniques for assessing subtalar joint position: a reliability study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994; 19(3) : 162 -7 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 27.

    Holder LE, Michael RH. The specific scintigraphic pattern of "shin splints in the lower leg": concise communication. J Nucl Med. 1984; 25(8) : 865 -9 [PubMed]

  • 28.

    Thacker SB, Gilchrist J, Stroup DF, Kimsey CJ. The impact of stretching on sports injury risk: a systematic review of the literature. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36(3) : 371 -8 [PubMed]

  • 29.

    Jones MM. Kinanthropometric Assessement. Guidelines for Athlete Assessment in New Zealand Sport.

  • 30.

    Bandholm T, Boysen L, Haugaard S, Zebis MK, Bencke J. Foot medial longitudinal-arch deformation during quiet standing and gait in subjects with medial tibial stress syndrome. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2008; 47(2) : 89 -95 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 31.

    Burne SG, Khan KM, Boudville PB, Mallet RJ, Newman PM, Steinman LJ, et al. Risk factors associated with exertional medial tibial pain: a 12 month prospective clinical study. Br J Sports Med. 2004; 38(4) : 441 -5 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 32.

    Moen MH, Rayer S, Schipper M, Schmikli S, Weir A, Tol JL, et al. Shockwave treatment for medial tibial stress syndrome in athletes; a prospective controlled study. Br J Sports Med. 2012; 46(4) : 253 -7 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 33.

    Bennett JE, Reinking MF, Rauh MJ. The relationship between isotonic plantar flexor endurance, navicular drop, and exercise-related leg pain in a cohort of collegiate cross-country runners. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012; 7(3) : 267 -78 [PubMed]

  • 34.

    Mueller MJ, Host JV, Norton BJ. Navicular drop as a composite measure of excessive pronation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1993; 83(4) : 198 -202 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 35.

    Brody DM. Techniques in the evaluation and treatment of the injured runner. Orthop Clin North Am. 1982; 13(3) : 541 -58 [PubMed]

  • 36.

    Gallo RA, Plakke M, Silvis ML. Common Leg Injuries of Long-Distance Runners: Anatomical and Biomechanical Approach. Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach. 2012; 4(6) : 485 -95 [DOI]

  • Copyright © 2015, Sports Medicine Research Center. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.