Investigating the Prevalence of Substance Use Among Students of Medical Science Universities in the Eighth Macro-region of Iran

AUTHORS

Mohadeseh Balvardi ORCID 1 , Nasim Dehdashti ORCID 2 , Zahra Imani-Goghary ORCID 1 , Mahnaz Ghaljeh ORCID 3 , Hamideh Bashiri ORCID 4 , * , Kamran Babaee ORCID 5 , Salman Daneshi ORCID 2 , Mehdi Raei ORCID 6

1 Sirjan School of Medical Sciences, Sirjan, Iran

2 Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran

3 Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran

4 Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

5 Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran

6 Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

How to Cite: Balvardi M , Dehdashti N, Imani-Goghary Z, Ghaljeh M , Bashiri H, et al. Investigating the Prevalence of Substance Use Among Students of Medical Science Universities in the Eighth Macro-region of Iran. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2021;10(4):e113237. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.113237.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction: 10 (4); e113237
Published Online: September 28, 2021
Article Type: Research Article
Received: January 27, 2021
Revised: August 23, 2021
Accepted: August 24, 2021
Crossmark
Crossmark
CHECKING
READ FULL TEXT

Abstract

Background: The growing trend of substance use among students is a serious threat for the health of young adults. Using Network Scale-up (NSU) method

Objectives: The present study was designed to indirectly estimate the prevalence of substance use among students of medical science universities in the eighth macro-region of Iran to attract government attention to this problem.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 3,900 students from medical science universities in the eighth macro-region of Iran (2300 from Kerman and 1600 from Sistan and Baluchestan provinces) in 2019. The sample size of each university was determined using a multistage non-random sampling approach. The participants were asked to introduce their academic close friends who did high-risk behaviors during last year.

Results: Out of 3,900 participants, 1,872 (48%) were males and 2,028 (52%) were females. Students from all academic degrees contributed to this study. The prevalence of alcohol, marijuana, hemp, chewing tobacco, tramadol, methylphenidate, and opium use were 20.6% (95% CI: 19.3 - 21.9), 13.5% (CI: 12.4 - 14.5), 4.1% (CI: 3.5 - 4.7), 6.3% (CI: 5.5 - 7.1), 3.1% (CI: 2.6 - 3.7), 6.5% (CI: 5.7 - 7.3), and 4.0% (CI: 3.1 - 4.9), respectively. Also, the prevalence of substance use was higher among male students than females.

Conclusions: Male students are more at risk for substance use. The rates of alcohol and marijuana consumption were higher among students. Training programs are recommended to increase awareness level of young people and the society about disadvantages of these behaviors.

1. Background

High-risk behaviors are defined as damaging activities, which can have adverse effects on health and increase the risk of disease and subsequently can lead to social problems, disability, and even death (1-3). One of these risky behaviors is substance use that is considered a hindrance to the progress of teenagers and adolescents in their future life (4). The growing trend of these behaviors is a serious threat that has caused health concerns at the national and international levels (5).

Involvement in risky behaviors reaches its peak among young people who comprise approximately one-third of the total population in Iran (6). Young people tend to have extramarital and unprotected sex (7), drink alcohol, and use non-prescription and illicit drugs such as narcotics and stimulants (4) more than people in other ages. Nicotine, tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, methamphetamine, methylphenidate, opium, and tramadol seem to be the most prevalent addictive substances worldwide and a leading cause of some dangerous diseases (8-11). According to the results of previous studies, drug abuse can increase the risk of mood and mental disabilities and also early mortality rate (12), which had been growing rapidly in developing countries such as Iran in the last two decades (13, 14). Clinical investigations of drugs or alcohol consumption have shown that the risk of other high-risk behaviors such as unprotected sexual relationships and needle sharing may be increased, leading to the incidence of chronic diseases such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (15).

Thus, showing the extent of the problem is necessary to keep governors informed and find solutions for solving this problem. However, due to the stigma of these behaviors, especially in Islamic countries, participants of the study may refuse to answer or hide the truth, which affects the study results negatively (16, 17). So gathering information in an indirect way is helpful. One of the indirect methods for correct estimation of the high-risk behavior-exposed groups is the Network Scale-up (NSU) method (13). The NSU method relies on the data collected from study participants, as well as participants’ responses on behalf of their network (4). It seems that this method offers more comprehensive and precise information in terms of estimating the size of the groups with high-risk behaviors given the religious beliefs, Islamic values, and customary and cultural issues (7). A study pointed to fear of being rejected by family and friends as a reason to hide the issue (18); so, the treatment may not occur. Another study results showed that NSU method leads to a realistic estimation of risky behaviors, because the respondents tell the truth when sensitive questions are asked indirectly (19).

Based on the necessity to estimate the size of hard-to-count and high-risk behaviors-exposed groups, which is a fundamental problem in social sciences and public health (5), the importance of physical and mental health of students who constitute a large group of the society (7), as well as to prevent the diseases related to risky behaviors such as acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).

2. Objectives

The present study aimed to estimate the prevalence of substance use among students of medical science universities in the eighth macro-region of Iran by NSU method.

3. Methods

3.1. Study Design and Sample Size

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 3,900 students from medical science universities in the eighth macro-region of Iran (Kerman and Sistan and Baluchestan provinces) in 2019. Among the participants, 1,872 males and 2,028 females from all academic degrees contributed to this study. Inclusion criteria entailed the students who attended the target university at least for one semester and stated their willingness to participate in the study. The sample size of each university was determined using a multistage non-random sampling. At first, quota sampling method was used to determine sample size at each university based on proportional to size approach. After that, convenience sampling was done for selecting students as they were recruited from all departments. Sample size was calculated according to the results of a similar study, which reported the alcohol use 18.2% (4). Assuming P = 0.182 and effect size to be 0.013 we arrived at a sample size of 3,384 at 0.05 significance level. The sample size was increased by up to 20% yielding the maximum sample size of 4,000 participants. Also 2.5% of questionnaires were removed due to unreliable answers. The final sample size included 2,300 students from Kerman province and 1,600 students from Sistan and Baluchestan province.

The Ethics Committee of SIRUMS reviewed and approved the study design and all procedures (IR.SIRUMS.REC.1397.001).

3.2. Data Collection and Instruments

The questionnaire consisted of two main parts. In the first part, the demographic characteristics of the participants (age, sex, marital status, and education) were collected. In the second part, they were asked about the number of close friends who consumed alcohol, marijuana, hemp, chewing tobacco, tramadol for non-medical purpose, methylphenidate, and opium over the past year either for fun or due to continued repetition. The reliability of the questionnaire had been assessed in a previous study, and test-retest examination had been done for assessing the reliability of the questionnaire; the mean kappa was reported as 79%, and each question was analyzed based on a paired t-test one by one. A P-value greater than 0.05 was considered as significant (5).

To reduce errors, the participants were informed about the aim of the study, and they were assured about the confidentiality of their data prior to the study. The participants were then asked to introduce some of their friends. The respondents recognized these people by name and face contact and communicated with them by phone or email several times a week outside of the class (20). The data were collected by 25 trained interviewers, and the participants were asked to put the filled questionnaire in a box without mentioning their names.

3.3. Data Management and Analysis

One of the indirect methods for the estimation of the exact size of the target groups is the NSU method (4, 13). This method estimates the proportion of people in high-risk groups in the community based on the average number of people that respondents know in hidden groups and the average size of the respondents’ individual network (21). We employed the NSU method to analyze data in this study. We adjusted for the clustering effect of universities in the analysis using survey analysis. All estimates were weighted based on the inverse probability weight of college sampling. We used the Chi-squared test for comparing two proportions. Statistical analysis was carried out by Excel and SPSS software version 19. In all tests, significant level was set as 0.05.

4. Results

The mean (SD) age of students was 22.45 (3.25) years with an age range of 19 - 47 years. Most of them were single (78.4%) and bachelor students (63.5%). Mean number of close friends for the medical universities was 8.1. Other information is provided in Table 1.

Table 1. Descriptive Attributes of Participants a
AttributeTotal (n = 3900)Province
Kerman (n = 2300)Sistan and Baluchestan (n = 1600)
Age
19 - 293718 (95.3)2196 (95.5)1522 (95.1)
30 - 39164 (4.2)95 (4.1)69 (4.3)
> 4018 (0.5)9 (0.4)9 (0.6)
Sex
Male1872 (48.0)1142 (49.7)730 (45.6)
Female2028 (52.0)1158 (50.3)870 (54.4)
Marital status
Single3058 (78.4)1853 (80.6)1205 (75.3)
Married774 (19.8)407 (17.7)367 (22.9)
Divorced68 (1.7)40 (1.7)28 (1.7)
Education
Associate’s degree814 (20.9)581 (25.3)233 (14.6)
B.Sc.2478 (63.5)1304 (56.7)1174 (73.4)
M.Sc.201 (5.1)139 (6.0)62 (3.9)
Ph.D.84 (2.1)63 (2.7)21 (1.3)
General practitioner323 (8.3)213 (9.3)110 (6.9)

aValues are expressed as No. (%).

The prevalence of substance use among male students was higher than females in all universities. Alcohol and marijuana consumption were the most prevalent risky behavior among all students. While marijuana use was the second most prevalent risky behavior, chewing tobacco was more prevalent in students of Sistan and Baluchestan province. Chi-square test was used to compare substance use between students of medical universities of Kerman and Sistan and Baluchestan provinces. Marijuana, hemp, alcohol, tramadol, and methylphenidate consumption were more prevalent among students of medical universities in Kerman province, while the prevalence of chewing tobacco and opium were higher among students of medical universities in Sistan and Baluchestan province (P < 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2. The Prevalence of Substance Use in Last Year Among All Students According to Gender and Province
Drug usersTotal (n = 3900) (CI 95%)Male (n = 1872) (CI 95%)Female (n = 2028) (CI 95%)ProvinceP-Value a
Kerman (n = 2300) (CI 95%)Sistan and Baluchestan (n = 1600) (CI 95%)
Marijuana13.5 (12.4, 14.5)23.5 (21.5, 25.5)3.5 (2.7, 4.4)16.3 (14.8, 17.8)9.0 (7.5, 10.4)< 0.001
Hemp4.1 (3.5, 4.7)7.5 (6.3, 8.7)1.0 (0.5, 1.4)4.6 (3.7, 5.4)3.4 (2.5, 4.3)< 0.001
Chewing Tobacco6.3 (5.5, 7.1)10.9 (9.5, 12.4)1.6 (1.0, 2.2)4.1 (3.2, 4.9)10.0 (8.5, 11.4)< 0.001
Alcohol20.6 (19.3, 21.9)33.6 (31.5, 35.8)7.9 (6.6, 9.1)26.0 (24.2, 27.8)12.2 (10.5, 13.8)< 0.001
Tramadol3.1 (2.6, 3.7)4.4 (3.5, 5.3)2.3 (1.6, 3.03)3.5 (2.8, 4.3)2.5 (1.7, 3.3)< 0.001
Methylphenidate6.5 (5.7, 7.3)9.0 (7.7, 10.3)3.6 (2.7, 4.4)7.0 (6.0, 8.1)5.7 (4.6, 6.9)< 0.001
Opium4.0 (3.1, 4.9)6.2 (5.1, 7.3)1.1 (0.6, 1.5)4.0 (3.2, 4.8)4.7 (3.7, 5.8)< 0.001

aP-values were calculated by χ2 test.

Investigating the prevalence of substance use among universities showed in Table 3. The prevalence of the substances use among men and females are reported in Figures 1 and 2.

Table 3. The Prevalence of Substance Use Among Students of Medical Science Universities in Kerman and Sistan and Baluchestan.
UniversityMarijuana (CI 95%)Hemp (CI 95%)Chewing Tobacco (CI 95%)Alcohol (CI 95%)Tramadol (CI 95%)Methylphenidate (CI 95%)Opium (CI 95%)
Kerman University of Medical Sciences (KUMS), n = 100018.6 (16.2, 21.1)5.2 (4.2, 6.2)3.9 (2.6, 5.1)27.5 (54.6, 30.3)4.8 (3.5, 6.2)8.8 (7.0, 10.6)5.4 (4.0, 6.8)
Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences (RUMS), n = 40016.3 (12.6, 20.0)5.4 (4.4, 6.4)4.8 (2.7, 7.0)22.5 (18.3, 26.7)2.9 (1.2, 4.5)4.3 (2.2, 6.3)4.6 (2.5, 6.7)
Jiroft University of Medical Sciences (JUMS), n = 30011.6 (7.9, 15.3)1.1 (0.6, 1.6)0.5 (0, 1.2)27.8 (22.6, 33.0)1.7 (0.2, 3.6)2.5 (0.7, 4.3)0.7 (0, 1.6)
Bam University of Medical Sciences (BUMS), n = 40013.3 (9.9, 16.7)5.1 (4.1, 6.02)3.6 (1.6, 5.3)27.2 (22.8, 31.7)1.7 (0.4, 3.0)8.3 (5.6, 11.1)1.2 (0.1, 2.3)
Sirjan University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), n = 20013.7 (8.8, 15.4)3.3 (2.5, 4.1)9.4 (5.3, 9.0)21.1 (15.3, 26.8)4.1 (1.3, 6.9)6.1 (2.7, 9.4)3.2 (0.7, 5.7)
Zahedan University of Medical Sciences (ZUMS), n = 8507.1 (5.3, 9.0)3.5 (2.7, 4.3)7.1 (5.3, 9.0)9.7 (7.6, 11.8)3.0 (1.8, 4.2)5.1 (3.6, 6.7)5.6 (4.0, 7.2)
Zabol University of Medical Sciences (ZbUMS), n = 45015.4 (12.2, 18.7)4.9 (3.9, 5.8)12.3 (9.3, 15.2)20.0 (16.4, 23.6)1.6 (0.4, 2.8)8.2 (5.9, 10.8)4.2 (2.3, 6.1)
Iranshahr University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), n = 3005.8 (3.1, 8.5)1.5 (1.0, 2.1)18.2 (13.7, 22.6)9.4 (6.0, 12.8)2.1 (0.5, 3.8)4.0 (1.8, 6.3)1.6 (0.2, 3.1)
Figure 1. The prevalence of substance use estimated by NSU methods among male students, Iran 2019.
Figure 2. The prevalence of substance use estimated by NSU methods among female students, Iran 2019.

5. Discussion

The findings of the current study indicated that substance use in Kerman and Sistan, and Baluchestan medical universities are more common in male students than females. Consistent with this study, Zahedi et al. reported that the use of water pipe, alcohol, and cigarettes in female students of Kerman universities was less than males (4). In a national study conducted by Nikfarjam et al. the prevalence of hashish, shire (a combination of opium residue and pure opium), heroin, methamphetamine, LSD, and ecstasy consumption in males was higher than in females (22). Previous studies in Iran and other countries reported that the prevalence of alcohol and illicit substance use, as well as prescription drug misuse, was more frequent in males than females (23-25). Due to the social stigma and cultural taboo of substance abuse by women (26), the prevalence of these behaviors was higher among men.

As the results showed, drinking alcohol (20.6%) had the highest prevalence among students of both provinces. The highest prevalence after alcohol was reported for marijuana use among students of Kerman (16.3%) and chewing tobacco (10.0%) among students of Sistan and Baluchestan. Zahedi et al. (4) estimated the prevalence of alcohol consumption in students of Kerman universities as 18.1% by direct method and 18.2% by NSU method. In Zahedan city, the prevalence of alcohol use was estimated as 9.7% in high school students (27). Increased advertising on some social networks (28), easier access to alcohol and marijuana illegally (29), and unawareness of their side effects (30) may be the major causes of growing trend among young people for consumption of these agents.

After alcohol and marijuana, methylphenidate (6.5%), chewing tobacco (6.3%), hemp (4.1%), opium (4.0%), and tramadol (3.1%) were the most common substances used in both provinces. However, the prevalence rate and the pattern of substance use were different among the students of the two provinces. The prevalence of methylphenidate consumption was 6.5%, which is more than estimated rate of this drug in other studies: 2.7% (23), 6.4% (31), and 1.8% (32), 1.2% (5). It is reported that some medical university students have a positive attitude toward using some pharmaceutical drugs to enhance normal brain function (33). In another study by NSU method in Kerman University of Medical Sciences, it was found that the prevalence of alcohol, opium, methamphetamine, and tramadol was 8.1%, 2.2%, 1.2%, and 4.8%, respectively (5).

Our results showed that the use of opium was more frequent among students of Sistan and Baluchestan universities than Kerman universities, which may be due to shared border of Sistan and Baluchestan province with Afghanistan and high availability of this substance in this province (34). Also the World Health Organization (WHO) reported that Iran has a high rate of opium abusers in comparison to other countries in the world (35). According to the results of a study conducted in Tehran universities, the prevalence of opium and heroin was reported 2.3% and 2.2%, respectively (36), which is less than in eastern provinces, possibly due to the easier availability of these substances in eastern regions. In another study, the prevalence of marijuana, cocaine, and heroin use in the United States were 49.1, 5.2, and 0.5%, respectively (37). Normalization, lack of restrictive rules, and considering the drug as a safe substance are other reasons for tendency of young people toward them. Thus, setting some restrictive rules in living places (home or dormitory) or workplace (38) and providing information about substances’ side effects and risk of addiction can be effective in preventing these risky behaviors (39).

Gathering sensitive information was the main limitation for both the researchers and participants of this study. In this regard, trained interviewers who could make a good relationship with the respondents were needed. Considering that alcohol and illegal substance use are serious problems among young people, especially university students, and high prevalence of these behaviors in students of medical science universities in the eighth macro-region of Iran, increasing awareness level of authorities, adolescent, and young people about this issue and changing students’ attitude toward using these drugs is essential.

5.1. Conclusions

The results of this study indicated that substance use was more rampant in university students of eighth macro-region of Iran and in males than females. Alcohol was the most prevalent item among students of medical universities in both provinces. Marijuana use was in the second level in Kerman and chewing tobacco in Sistan and Baluchestan. The use of opioids was more common in students of Sistan and Baluchestan province compared to Kerman province.

So the authorities of universities should the monitor risky behaviors among students, educate them about the disadvantages, and also provide healthy activities and entertainment for students. Further studies are required to determine the incidence rate of high-risk behaviors in school students. Also studies for assessing the effectiveness of various prevention programs are needed.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Tariq N, Gupta V. High risk behaviors. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL); 2021.

  • 2.

    Heydari ST, Izedi S, Sarikhani Y, Kalani N, Akbary A, Miri A, et al. The prevalence of substance abuse and associated risk factors among university students in the city of Jahrom, southern Iran. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2015;4(2). doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.4(2)2015.22381.

  • 3.

    Refahi SAA, Hosseinbor M, Poudineh Z, Sharif Hosseinbor M, Masumian S. Prevalence of consumption of addictive substances among students of Islamic Azad University (Zahedan Branch). Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2016;6(1). doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.19645.

  • 4.

    Zahedi R, Noroozi A, Hajebi A, Haghdoost AA, Baneshi MR, Sharifi H, et al. Self-reported and network scale-up estimates of substance use prevalence among university students in Kerman, Iran. J Res Health Sci. 2018;18(2):413. [PubMed: PMC7204424].

  • 5.

    Kazemzadeh Y, Shokoohi M, Baneshi MR, Haghdoost AA. The frequency of high-risk behaviors among Iranian college students using indirect methods: Network scale-up and crosswise model. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2016;5(3). e25130. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.25130. [PubMed: 27818962]. [PubMed Central: PMC5086407].

  • 6.

    Farahani FK, Shah I, Cleland J, Mohammadi MR. Adolescent males and young females in Tehran: differing perspectives, behaviors and needs for reproductive health and implications for gender sensitive interventions. J Reprod Infertil. 2012;13(2):101-10. [PubMed: 23926532]. [PubMed Central: PMC3719336].

  • 7.

    Maltiel R, Raftery AE, McCormick TH, Baraff AJ. Estimating population size using the network scale up method. Ann Appl Stat. 2015;9(3):1247-77. doi: 10.1214/15-AOAS827. [PubMed: 26949438]. [PubMed Central: PMC4777323].

  • 8.

    Kaloyanides KB, McCabe SE, Cranford JA, Teter CJ. Prevalence of illicit use and abuse of prescription stimulants, alcohol, and other drugs among college students: relationship with age at initiation of prescription stimulants. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27(5):666-74. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.5.666. [PubMed: 17461701]. [PubMed Central: PMC2377411].

  • 9.

    Ghandour LA, El Sayed DS, Martins SS. Prevalence and patterns of commonly abused psychoactive prescription drugs in a sample of university students from Lebanon: An opportunity for cross-cultural comparisons. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;121(1-2):110-7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.08.021. [PubMed: 21924844]. [PubMed Central: PMC3654541].

  • 10.

    de Visser RO, Rissel CE, Smith AM, Richters J. Sociodemographic correlates of selected health risk behaviors in a representative sample of Australian young people. Int J Behav Med. 2006;13(2):153-62. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1302_7. [PubMed: 16712433].

  • 11.

    Divinakumar KJ, Patra P, Prakash J, Daniel A. Prevalence and patterns of tobacco use and nicotine dependence among males industrial workers. Ind Psychiatry J. 2017;26(1):19-23. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_14_17. [PubMed: 29456316]. [PubMed Central: PMC5810161].

  • 12.

    Bashiri H, Rezayof A, Sahebgharani M, Tavangar SM, Zarrindast MR. Modulatory effects of the basolateral amygdala alpha2-adrenoceptors on nicotine-induced anxiogenic-like behaviours of rats in the elevated plus maze. Neuropharmacology. 2016;105:478-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.02.010. [PubMed: 26878830].

  • 13.

    Salganik MJ, Fazito D, Bertoni N, Abdo AH, Mello MB, Bastos FI. Assessing network scale-up estimates for groups most at risk of HIV/AIDS: evidence from a multiple-method study of heavy drug users in Curitiba, Brazil. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(10):1190-6. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr246. [PubMed: 22003188]. [PubMed Central: PMC3208143].

  • 14.

    Hajian K, Khirkhah F, Habibi M. [Frequency of risky behaviours among students in Babol Universities]. J Gorgan Univ of Med Sci. 2011;13(2):53-60. Persian.

  • 15.

    Sajjadi H, Jorjoran Shushtari Z, Shati M, Salimi Y, Dejman M, Vameghi M, et al. An indirect estimation of the population size of students with high-risk behaviors in select universities of medical sciences: A network scale-up study. PLoS One. 2018;13(5). e0195364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195364. [PubMed: 29738560]. [PubMed Central: PMC5940232].

  • 16.

    Jann B, Jerke J, Krumpal I. Asking sensitive questions using the crosswise model: An experimental survey measuring plagiarism. Public Opin. Q. 2011;76(1):32-49. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfr036.

  • 17.

    Khosravi A, Mousavi SA, Chaman R, Khosravi F, Amiri M, Shamsipour M. Crosswise model to assess sensitive issues: A study on prevalence of drug abuse among university students of Iran. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2015;4(2). e24388. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.24388v2. [PubMed: 26405682]. [PubMed Central: PMC4579483].

  • 18.

    Ramchand R, Griffin BA, Harris KM, McCaffrey DF, Morral AR. A prospective investigation of suicide ideation, attempts, and use of mental health service among adolescents in substance abuse treatment. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008;22(4):524-32. doi: 10.1037/a0012969. [PubMed: 19071977]. [PubMed Central: PMC3678768].

  • 19.

    Maghsoudi A, Jalali M, Neydavoodi M, Rastad H, Hatami I, Dehghan A. Estimating the prevalence of high-risk behaviors using network scale-up method in university students of Larestan in 2014. J Subst Use. 2016;22(2):145-8. doi: 10.3109/14659891.2016.1150528.

  • 20.

    Stroup D, Lyerla R, Mahy M, Smith C. Guidelines on estimating the size of populations most at risk to HIV. Geneva: UNAIDS/WHO; 2010.

  • 21.

    Saidel T, Loo V, Salyuk T, Emmanuel F, Morineau G, Lyerla R. Applying current methods in size estimation for high risk groups in the context of concentrated epidemics: Lessons learned. J HIV/AIDS Surveill Epidemiol. 2010;2(1).

  • 22.

    Nikfarjam A, Shokoohi M, Shahesmaeili A, Haghdoost AA, Baneshi MR, Haji-Maghsoudi S, et al. National population size estimation of illicit drug users through the network scale-up method in 2013 in Iran. Int J Drug Policy. 2016;31:147-52. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.013. [PubMed: 26980349].

  • 23.

    Abbasi-Ghahramanloo A, Fotouhi A, Zeraati H, Rahimi-Movaghar A. Prescription drugs, alcohol, and illicit substance use and their correlations among medical sciences students in Iran. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2015;4(1). e21945. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.21945. [PubMed: 25821750]. [PubMed Central: PMC4360541].

  • 24.

    Zarrabi H, Najafi K, Kafi M, Shirazi M. Substance use among students of Guilan University of Medical Sciences in Iran in 2005-2006. Acta Med Iran. 2009;47(6):473-8.

  • 25.

    Greenfield SF, Back SE, Lawson K, Brady KT. Substance abuse in women. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2010;33(2):339-55. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2010.01.004. [PubMed: 20385341]. [PubMed Central: PMC3124962].

  • 26.

    Ziaaddini H, Ziaaddini T, Nakhaee N. Pattern and trend of substance abuse in eastern rural Iran: A household survey in a rural community. J Addict. 2013;2013:297378. doi: 10.1155/2013/297378. [PubMed: 24804141]. [PubMed Central: PMC4007750].

  • 27.

    Bakhshani N, Dahmardei M, Shahraki-Sanavi F, Hosseinbor M, Ansari-Moghaddam A. Substance abuse among high school students in Zahedan. Health Scope. 2014;3(1). doi: 10.17795/jhealthscope-14805.

  • 28.

    Jensen M, Hussong AM, Baik J. Text messaging and social network site use to facilitate alcohol involvement: A comparison of U.S. and Korean college students. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018;21(5):311-7. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0616. [PubMed: 29668294]. [PubMed Central: PMC5963875].

  • 29.

    Osilla KC, Pedersen ER, Ewing BA, Miles JN, Ramchand R, D'Amico EJ. The effects of purchasing alcohol and marijuana among adolescents at-risk for future substance use. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2014;9:38. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-9-38. [PubMed: 25231097]. [PubMed Central: PMC4177688].

  • 30.

    Ammerman S, Ryan S, Adelman WP, Committee on Substance Abuse TCOA. The impact of marijuana policies on youth: clinical, research, and legal update. Pediatrics. 2015;135(3):e769-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-4147. [PubMed: 25624385].

  • 31.

    Habibzadeh A, Alizadeh M, Malek A, Maghbooli L, Shoja MM, Ghabili K. Illicit methylphenidate use among Iranian medical students: prevalence and knowledge. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2011;5:71-6. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S13818. [PubMed: 21340040]. [PubMed Central: PMC3038997].

  • 32.

    Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Miech RA, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2014: Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2015.

  • 33.

    Bell S, Partridge B, Lucke J, Hall W. Australian university students’ attitudes towards the acceptability and regulation of pharmaceuticals to improve academic performance. Neuroethics. 2012;6(1):197-205. doi: 10.1007/s12152-012-9153-9.

  • 34.

    Moradinazar M, Najafi F, Jalilian F, Pasdar Y, Hamzeh B, Shakiba E, et al. Prevalence of drug use, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking and measure of socioeconomic-related inequalities of drug use among Iranian people: findings from a national survey. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020;15(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13011-020-00279-1. [PubMed: 32503660]. [PubMed Central: PMC7275311].

  • 35.

    Soroosh D, Neamatshahi M, Zarmehri B, Nakhaee S, Mehrpour O. Drug-induced prolonged corrected QT interval in patients with methadone and opium overdose. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2019;14(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13011-019-0196-3. [PubMed: 30786894]. [PubMed Central: PMC6383250].

  • 36.

    Taremian F, Bolhari J, Pairavi H, Ghazi Tabatabaeii M. [The prevalence of drug abuse among university students in tehran]. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2008;13(4):335-42. Persian.

  • 37.

    Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the future, national survey results on drug use, 1975–2011. Volume I. The University of Michigan Institute for Social Research; 2012.

  • 38.

    Kipkorir P, Ngeno V, Serem A. Gender perspective on drivers of cigarette smoking: Two part model approach. SciMed J. 2019;1(1):12-9. doi: 10.28991/SciMedJ-2019-0101-2.

  • 39.

    Nakhaei Moghaddam T, Mobaraki F, Darvish Moghaddam MR, Jafardokht Bonjar M. A review on the addictive materials Paan Masala (Paan Parag) and Nass (Naswar). SciMedicine. 2019;1(2):64-73. doi: 10.28991/SciMedJ-2019-0102-4.

  • Copyright © 2021, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
    COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: