Consanguineous Marriage and the Risk of Parents Having Children with Cleft Lip and Palate

AUTHORS

Soraya Bakhshani ORCID 1 , *

1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiologym, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, IR Iran

How to Cite: Bakhshani S. Consanguineous Marriage and the Risk of Parents Having Children with Cleft Lip and Palate. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2021;10(2):e114912. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.114912.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction: 10 (2); e114912
Published Online: June 13, 2021
Article Type: Letter
Received: March 31, 2021
Revised: April 4, 2021
Accepted: April 4, 2021
Crossmark
Crossmark
CHECKING
READ FULL TEXT

Dear editor,

Consanguineous marriage is a marriage where the spouses are relatives and have common grandparents. In different societies, including Iran, marriage between relatives, particularly among third-degree relatives (such as cousins) is not only common but also desirable. A study in Iran showed that about 38% of marriages are between relatives (1). Due to the genetic commonalities of relatives, their children are more likely to develop autosomal recessive diseases.

Congenital anomalies are among the key factors related to mortality (2), hospitalization, and disability in the society, and approximately 3% of live births suffer from such abnormalities. Genetic factors, consanguineous marriage, medications, and drug abuse are the most essential risk factors for congenital anomalies. Numerous abnormalities are associated with consanguineous marriages, and the closer the kinship, the greater the likelihood of disease due to the proportion of common genes. The proportion of common genes in third-degree relatives is about one-eighth. In general, genetic diseases are more common in consanguineous marriages (3).

Cleft lip and palate are the most common congenital anomalies that occur alone or together and can also be seen with other congenital malformations. Overall, the incidence of orofacial clefts is estimated at 1.5 per thousand live births (4, 5). This rate varies in different populations. A recent study (6) on children born in Zahedan hospitals over an 11-year period found that among infants whose parents had hospital records, infants born of consanguineous marriages were about 4.5 times more likely to have orofacial clefts than infants born of non-consanguineous marriages, and about 82% of neonates born with cleft lip or cleft palate were born of consanguineous marriages.

Various factors are associated with the occurrence of different types of clefts, and almost 40% of all clefts can be attributed to genetic factors. Children with clefts suffer from numerous communication, social, and educational problems and low quality of life, and their treatment is also very complex, costly, and multifaceted.

Given the above, it seems that consanguineous marriage is a major risk factor for congenital anomalies, including non-syndromic orofacial clefts (NSOFC) (7) with an odds ratio of about 2 (8). Sabbagh et al. found that NSOFC was significantly correlated with consanguinity (odds ratio = 2.5) (9). This shows that the risk of having an infant with a cleft lip or cleft palate doubles if the parents have a consanguineous marriage.

In countries like Iran, where consanguineous marriages are both common and valuable, and the likelihood of developing congenital anomalies is rising given the societal beliefs supporting consanguineous marriages, policymakers in the health sector need to implement preventative strategies to minimize the prevalence of consanguineous marriages. Genetic counseling and the participation of key and influential people in the community in the process of designing and implementing health plans seem to be an inevitable necessity.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Saadat M, Ansari-Lari M, Farhud DD. Consanguineous marriage in Iran. Ann Hum Biol. 2004;31(2):263-9. doi: 10.1080/03014460310001652211. [PubMed: 15204368].

  • 2.

    Carlson L, Hatcher KW, Vander Burg R. Elevated infant mortality rates among oral cleft and isolated oral cleft cases: a meta-analysis of studies from 1943 to 2010. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013;50(1):2-12. doi: 10.1597/11-087. [PubMed: 22023166].

  • 3.

    Bittles AH. Endogamy, consanguinity and community genetics. J Genet. 2002;81(3):91-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02715905. [PubMed: 12717037].

  • 4.

    Matthews JL, Oddone-Paolucci E, Harrop RA. The epidemiology of cleft lip and palate in Canada, 1998 to 2007. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015;52(4):417-24. doi: 10.1597/14-047. [PubMed: 25007034].

  • 5.

    Malic CC, Lam M, Donelle J, Richard L, Vigod SN, Benchimol EI. Incidence, risk factors, and mortality associated with orofacial cleft among children in Ontario, Canada. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(2). e1921036. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.21036. [PubMed: 32049294].

  • 6.

    Fakour SR, Bakhshani S, Bakhshani S. Occurrence of cleft lip and palate in terms of maternal health, parents' kinship, and neonate weight: A case study in the infants of southeastern part of Iran. Ambient Science. 2016;3(2/spl). doi: 10.21276/ambi.2016.03.sp1.ra01.

  • 7.

    Silva CM, Pereira MCM, Queiroz TB, Neves LTD. Can parental consanguinity be a risk factor for the occurrence of nonsyndromic oral cleft? Early Hum Dev. 2019;135:23-6. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.06.005. [PubMed: 31226652].

  • 8.

    Sabbagh HJ, Hassan MH, Innes NP, Baik AA, Mossey PA. Parental consanguinity and nonsyndromic orofacial clefts in children: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;51(5):501-13. doi: 10.1597/12-209. [PubMed: 23638915].

  • 9.

    Sabbagh HJ, Innes NP, Sallout BI, Alamoudi NM, Hamdan MA, Alhamlan N, et al. Birth prevalence of non-syndromic orofacial clefts in Saudi Arabia and the effects of parental consanguinity. Saudi Med J. 2015;36(9):1076-83. doi: 10.15537/smj.2015.9.11823.

  • Copyright © 2021, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
    COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: