The Prevalence of Substance Use Disorders Among University Students, a Cross-Sectional Study

AUTHORS

Ashraf Direkvand-Moghadam 1 , Kosar Piri 2 , AmirReza JamshidBeigi 2 , Safoura Taheri 3 , Yousef Veisani 4 , *

1 Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran

2 Student Research Committee, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran

3 Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Ayatollah Taleghani Hospital, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran

4 Psychosocial Injuries Research Center, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran

How to Cite: Direkvand-Moghadam A , Piri K, JamshidBeigi A, Taheri S, Veisani Y. The Prevalence of Substance Use Disorders Among University Students, a Cross-Sectional Study, Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2020 ; 14(2):e99324. doi: 10.5812/ijpbs.99324.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences: 14 (2); e99324
Published Online: June 28, 2020
Article Type: Research Article
Received: November 12, 2019
Revised: February 12, 2020
Accepted: April 19, 2020
Crossmark
Crossmark
CHECKING
READ FULL TEXT

Abstract

Background: Substance use disorders (SUD) are serious social problems that cause physiological and psychological disorders. Adolescents and youth are known as high-risk groups for SUD.

Objectives: The present study aimed to investigate the pattern, prevalence, incidence, and etiology of SUD among all students studying at the Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam (Iran), during the academic year 2018 - 2019.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study, a multistage random sampling method was used to select the participants. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data. This questionnaire was designed to collect information about the participant’s demographic data, social data, medical and behavioral data. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics in SPSS 16 software.

Results: Participants’ ages mean ± SD was 23.5 ± 3.2 years old. The incidence of substance abuse was higher among men compared to women. The main observed pattern of SUD was Marijuana among consumers. The curiosity and increased memory had the highest and lowest incidence, respectively.

Conclusions: The incidence of SUD is high among Iranian students, and most of them have begun SUD in adolescence and because of curiosity. It is necessary to augment adolescents’ and young people’s awareness of the SUD and addiction consequences.

1. Background

Substance use disorders (SUD) is a condition in which the use of one or more substances leads to a clinical disorder (1). Nowadays, SUD has become a global problem and most countries in the world are involved with this problem (2). The prevalence and type of SUD varies between different countries and different jobs (3, 4). About 7% of Americans over the age of 12 years have SUD (5). Based on a study, approximately 15% of young Iranian adults have experienced a SUD (6).

In fact, the SUD is a serious social problem that causes physiological and psychological disorders (7). Results of studies confirm the lower quality of life in SUD individuals in comparison with other people (8-10). Iranian minister of internal affairs reported the SUD as the cause for 50% of divorces in Iran. Also, some mental complications such as depression, suicide, interpersonal relationship disorder are serious problems among individuals with substance abuse (11). The risky sexual behaviors is very high in young men with SUD (12).

Adolescents and Youth are a high-risk group for SUD. First of all: the side effects of SUD are very high among adolescents compared with older people (13). Second, most people with SUD mention their first experience as a teenager (14). It is believed that adverse effects of substance use disorders are more serious among young individuals as over 90% of substance users experience their first use during their adolescence and later face substance use disorders and its serious adverse effects (15). The trend of SUD is increasing among Iranian youth compared with previous years (16). Based on an Iranian cross-sectional study, 19.3% of the high school students were smokers (17).

University students are other high-risk groups for SUD (18-20). A study evaluated the associated factors with substance use among 731 French college students. The results of the study indicated that study participants had experienced tobacco in 84%, cannabis in 55%, alcohol in 37%, and heavy episodic drinking in 56% of cases (21).

Another study evaluated the use of alcohol and other drugs among 2017 nursing students. Participants mentioned the alcohol, marijuana, sedatives, and opioids consumption in 36.9%, 6.8%, 4.6%, and 2.6% of cases, respectively (22). Studies show that substance abuse threatens Iranian youth as well, especially medical students (23, 24).

So far, several factors have been identified as risk factors for SUD. Mental disorders are an important factor in increasing the risk of substance use (25). Kendler et al. (26) reported genetic and environmental factors as important factors of drug abuse disorders.

2. Objectives

In the present study, we aimed to investigate the pattern, prevalence, incidence, and etiology of SUD among all students studying at the Ilam University of Medical Sciences during the academic year 2018 - 2019.

3. Methods

3.1. Design

A cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the pattern, prevalence, incidence, and etiology of SUD among all students studying at the Ilam University of Medical Sciences during the academic year 2018 - 2019. A multistage random sampling method was used to select the participants. First, 3 faculties were randomly chosen from the Ilam University of Medical Sciences (Iran). Consequently, 376 university students were selected as the sample group. Since all questionnaires with incomplete or chaotic information were eliminated from the research process, data from 285 questionnaires were analyzed.

3.2. Questionnaire

A self-administered questioner was made by the research group to collect data .This questionnaire was designed to collect information about the participant’s demographic data, including age, gender, number of siblings, history of chronic disease, place of residency, level of education and history of failing during compulsory education); social data including lost parents, parents were living together during childhood or adolescence, parents’ education and job, and behavioral data, including criminal history, SUD status, SUD among relatives and friends and most favorite leisure activities.

Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics by SPSS software. Tables, charts, mean, mean ± SD and percent were used in descriptive statistics.

In Inferential statistics, the association between depression and qualitative variables was determined by using χ2 and Fisher Exact test.

3.3. Ethical Consideration

This study was registered at the ethical committee of the Ilam University of Medical Sciences (no.: 22.52.98.2308). Informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrollment in the study. To enhance confidentiality, all questionnaires were completed anonymously, and only required information was collected.

4. Results

Participants’ ages mean ± SD was 23.5 ± 3.2 years, with a range from 18 to 50. Most of the participants used to live in a Governmental dormitory (no.: 229/285). The demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Demographic Variable of the Study Participantsa
VariableValues
Gender
Male96 (33.7)
Female189 (66.3)
Total285 (100)
Educational level
Associate15 (5.3)
BA144 (50.7)
MA14 (4.9)
GP111 (39.1)
Total284 (100)
Location
Native31 (11.1)
Private dormitory6 (2.1)
Governmental dormitory229 (81.8)
Living with friends8 (2.9)
Single life6 (2.1)
Total280 (100)
Fathers job
Non-governmental154 (54)
Governmental131 (46)
Total 285 (100)
Mothers job
Non-governmental237 (83.1)
Governmental48 (16.9)
Total 285 (100)
Fathers education level
Illiterate58 (22.4)
Primary33 (12.7)
Diploma62 (23.9)
BA82 (31.7)
MA14 (5.4)
PhD10 (3.9)
Total259 (100)
Mothers education level
Illiterate88 (34.4)
Primary42 (16.4)
Diploma72 (28.1)
BA51 (19.9)
MA1 (0.4)
PhD2 (0.8)
Total256 (100.0)

aValues are expressed as No. (%).

The frequency and incidence of SUD were higher among men compared to withwomen. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.000) (Table 2).

Table 2. Comparison of the Incidence and Prevalence of substance Abuse Among Consumers Based on Gendera
VariableIncidenceTotalPrevalenceTotal
YesNoYesNo
Gender
Male44 (45)52 (55)96 (100)27 (28)69 (71)96 (33.33)
Female10 (5)178 (95)188 (100)1 (0.5)188 (99.5)189 (66.66)
Total54 (20)230 (80)284 (100)28 (9.5)257 (90.5)285 (100)
P value0.0000.000

aValues are expressed as No. (%).

The results showed that the highest incidence of the main pattern of substance used disorder was observed among Marijuana consumers and consumed. Also, the heroin and psychotropic substance users have the lowest prevalence. The incidence and prevalence of the main pattern of SUD among the study participants are presented in Table 3.

Table 3. Incidence and Prevalence of the Main Pattern of Substance Used Disorder Among the Study Participantsa
PatternIncidence Per 100 Subjects, Valid Cases = 284Prevalence Per 100 Subjects, Valid Cases = 284
Hashish7 (2.5)0 (0)
Opium21 (7.4)7 (2.5)
Heroin2 (0.7)1 (0.4)
Crystal3 (1.1)1 (0.4)
Combined substances3 (1.1)2 (0.7)
Psychotropic substances2 (0.7)1 (0.4)
Marijuana40 (14)15 (5.3)
Tramadol31 (10.9)18 (6.3)
Total54 (19)28 (9.8)

aValues are expressed as No. (%).

In the assessment of motivations or reasons behind SUD, curiosity and increased memory had the highest and lowest prevalence, respectively. The relationship between assessed motivations or reasons behind SUD and incidence and prevalence are presented in Table 4.

Table 4. the Relationship Between Assessed Motivations or Reasons Behind Substance Use and Incidence and Prevalencea
Etiologic FactorsIncidence, Valid Cases = 284Prevalence, Valid Cases = 284
ValuesP ValueValuesP Value
Curiosity32 (11.3)0.00017 (6)0.000
Fatigue1 (0.4)0.1900 (0)0.902
Recreation26 (9.2)0.00015 (5.3)0.000
Problems5 (1.8)0.0004 (1.4)0.000
Physical1 (0.4)0.0981 (0.4)0.019
Mental2 (0.7)0.0263 (1.1)0.007
Increased memory0 (0)0.9021 (0.4)0.190
Increase sexual power1 (0.4)0.0981 (0.4)0.190
Friends2 (0.7)0.1808 (2.8)0.000
Consumption in the family9 (3.2)0.00122 (7.7)0.003

aValues are expressed as No. (%).

Considering the evaluation of the first-time consumption, 4% of consumers had less than 15 years old, 2% of consumers had 15 - 18 years old and 94% of consumers had 19 or more years old.

5. Discussion

This study was conducted to identify the pattern, prevalence, incidence, and etiology of SUD substance abuse among students of the Ilam University of Medical Sciences.

The incidence and prevalence of SUD were reported in 20 % and 9.5 % of all study participants, respectively. The incidence and prevalence difference was statistically significant between men and women.

The results of a report in 2014 stated that a large number of adults aged 18 or older are involved in substance abuse. In fact, nearly 20 million of all adults ≤ 18 years old had a history of SUD during 2013, including aproximally16 million with alcohol use disorder and 6 million with illicit drug use disorder (27). One study reported the substance abuse as a major problem in 9.4% 0f the American population older than 12 years (28). Substance abuse often affects most segments of society, so that 10% to 15% of Americans are substance abusers (26). One Iranian study reported that about one-third (30.3%) of Iranian high school students had a history of substance abuse at one or more times, and 13.86% of all study participants were currently using substances (29). In another Iranian study, about 8% of students had substance abuse and most of them were living in dormitories (30).

Our results showed that the incidence of SUD among men was 9 times higher than women (45% vs. 5%). Consistent with our results, Narrow et al. reported a two-fold higher risk of substance abuse for men than women (31).

Ahmadi et al., in consistent with our results, reported the higher prevalence of substance abuse among Iranian men than in women (29).

In the evaluation of the type of abused substance, the highest incidence was reported in marijuana consumption (14%). However, the most prevalent use was in tramadol users (6.3%). The Trend of marijuana abuse is growing worldwide. So that the prevalence of US marijuana abuse was 4.1% in 2001 - 2002 and 9.5% in 2012 - 2013 (32). This increasing trend has even occurred in pregnant women. The prevalence of marijuana abuse increased from 2.37% in 2002 to 3.85% (95% CI: 2.87% - 5.18%) in 2014 (33). However, cigarette smoking has the highest incidence among Iranian high school students (25.4%) (29).

However, in our study, curiosity was the most common cause of SUD, but the history of substance abuse in the family was the most common cause of SUD. In a study of 12 441 high school seniors, “consumption to reduce pain” was the motivation of 45% of nonmedical users (34). Also, in an Iranian study, seeking pleasure and release of tension were the most common reasons for substance abuse among 397 Iranian high school students (29). Some students feel unsuccessful in their academic performance. Therefore, they use ADHD medication to enhance the ability to study and achieve academic success (35).

However, in the design of our study, we considered an equal number of male and female students and also requested that anonymous questionnaires be completed to increase the confidentiality of the information, but incomplete questionnaires were more common among men than women. This may suggest the participants' mistrust of the researcher as a limitation for the study.

5.1. Conclusions

The incidence and prevalence of SUD are high among Iranian students. There was a statistically significant difference between men and women in the incidence and prevalence of SUD. Most of the students have begun substance abuse in adolescence. Curiosity was the highest cause of first-time abuse for most students. Like most areas of the world, marijuana is the most commonly abused drug among Iranian students. Therefore, it is essential that families, administrators, policymakers, and health educators be aware of the status of SUD among students because they can do proper planning to reduce its incidence and subsequent complications.

Acknowledgements

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Rafiey H, Ghaderi S, Morovat B, Noori R, Effatpanah M, Mahjoub A, et al. Amphetamine type stimulants use in the adult population of Tehran: Implications for long term rehabilitation. Iran Rehabil J. 2017;15(4):303-8. doi: 10.29252/nrip.irj.15.4.303.

  • 2.

    Tavakoli M, Effatpanah M, Moradi A, Mahjoub A. Methamphetamine dependence among Iranian female methadone patients: A cross-sectional survey of three cities of Iran. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2018;12(2). e62866. doi: 10.5812/ijpbs.62866.

  • 3.

    Salimi S, Effatpanah M, Mahjoub A. Motivational interviewing can facilitate entry to matrix treatment for methamphetamine dependence. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2018;12(2). e63560. doi: 10.5812/ijpbs.63560.

  • 4.

    Shakiba K, Effatpanah M, Moradi A. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for methamphetamine dependence among methadone-maintained patients. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2018;12(2). e63615. doi: 10.5812/ijpbs.63615.

  • 5.

    Center for Behavioral Health Statistics Quality. Reports and detailed tables from the 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). 2018.

  • 6.

    Degenhardt L, Whiteford HA, Ferrari AJ, Baxter AJ, Charlson FJ, Hall WD, et al. Global burden of disease attributable to illicit drug use and dependence: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2013;382(9904):1564-74. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61530-5. [PubMed: 23993281].

  • 7.

    Muller AE, Havnes IA, Rognli EB, Bukten A. Inmates with harmful substance use increase both exercise and nicotine use under incarceration. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(12):2663. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122663. [PubMed: 30486386]. [PubMed Central: PMC6313574].

  • 8.

    Tiffany ST, Friedman L, Greenfield SF, Hasin DS, Jackson R. Beyond drug use: a systematic consideration of other outcomes in evaluations of treatments for substance use disorders. Addiction. 2012;107(4):709-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03581.x. [PubMed: 21981638]. [PubMed Central: PMC3257402].

  • 9.

    De Maeyer J, Vanderplasschen W, Broekaert E. Quality of life among opiate-dependent individuals: A review of the literature. Int J Drug Policy. 2010;21(5):364-80. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2010.01.010. [PubMed: 20172706].

  • 10.

    Lin CY, Chang KC, Wang JD, Lee LJ. Quality of life and its determinants for heroin addicts receiving a methadone maintenance program: Comparison with matched referents from the general population. J Formos Med Assoc. 2016;115(9):714-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.007. [PubMed: 26422442].

  • 11.

    Shahraki G, Sedaghat Z, Fararouei M. Family and social predictors of substance use disorder in Iran: a case-control study. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2019;14(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13011-019-0201-x. [PubMed: 31060577]. [PubMed Central: PMC6501311].

  • 12.

    Koblin BA, Chesney MA, Husnik MJ, Bozeman S, Celum CL, Buchbinder S, et al. High-risk behaviors among men who have sex with men in 6 US cities: baseline data from the EXPLORE Study. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(6):926-32. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.6.926. [PubMed: 12773357]. [PubMed Central: PMC1447872].

  • 13.

    Momtazi S, Rawson R. Substance abuse among Iranian high school students. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2010;23(3):221-6. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e328338630d. [PubMed: 20308905]. [PubMed Central: PMC4479403].

  • 14.

    Oshodi OY, Aina OF, Onajole AT. Substance use among secondary school students in an urban setting in Nigeria: prevalence and associated factors. Afr J Psychiatry (Johannesbg). 2010;13(1):52-7. doi: 10.4314/ajpsy.v13i1.53430. [PubMed: 20428599].

  • 15.

    Shekarchizadeh H, Khami MR, Mohebbi SZ, Virtanen JI. Oral health behavior of drug addicts in withdrawal treatment. BMC Oral Health. 2013;13:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-13-11. [PubMed: 23368406]. [PubMed Central: PMC3583702].

  • 16.

    Joveyni H, Dehdari T, Gohari M. Waterpipe smoking in the male college students: an education intervention using theory of planned behavior. J Res Health. 2013;3(4):497-503.

  • 17.

    Hammamizade OR, Mazaheri Tehrani A, Hajiketabi S, Khatami S, Fathi Moghadam M, Rahimi H, et al. Smoking frequency and some related factors among high school students of Kashan city, Iran. Int Arch Health Sci. 2015;2(3):107-13.

  • 18.

    McCabe SE, Knight JR, Teter CJ, Wechsler H. Non-medical use of prescription stimulants among US college students: prevalence and correlates from a national survey. Addiction. 2005;100(1):96-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00944.x. [PubMed: 15598197].

  • 19.

    O'Malley PM, Johnston LD. Epidemiology of alcohol and other drug use among American college students. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 2002;(14):23-39. doi: 10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.23. [PubMed: 12022728].

  • 20.

    Lewis TF, Mobley AK. Substance abuse and dependency risk: the role of peer perceptions, marijuana involvement, and attitudes toward substance use among college students. J Drug Educ. 2010;40(3):299-314. doi: 10.2190/DE.40.3.f. [PubMed: 21313988].

  • 21.

    Riou Franca L, Dautzenberg B, Falissard B, Reynaud M. Peer substance use overestimation among French university students: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:169. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-169. [PubMed: 20350317]. [PubMed Central: PMC2858117].

  • 22.

    Baldwin JN, Bartek JK, Scott DM, Davis-Hall RE, DeSimone E2. Survey of alcohol and other drug use attitudes and behaviors in nursing students. Subst Abus. 2009;30(3):230-8. doi: 10.1080/08897070903040964. [PubMed: 19591059].

  • 23.

    Jalilian F, Karami M, Ahmadpanah M, Ataee M, Ahmadi JT, Eslami AA, et al. Socio-demographic characteristics associated with cigarettes smoking, drug abuse and alcohol drinking among male medical university students in Iran. J Res Health Sci. 2015;15(1):42-6. [PubMed: 25821025].

  • 24.

    Sahraian A, Sharifian M, Omidvar B, Javadpour A. Prevalence of substance abuse among the medical students in southern Iran. Shiraz E-Med J. 2010;11(4). en. e20439.

  • 25.

    Swendsen J, Conway KP, Degenhardt L, Glantz M, Jin R, Merikangas KR, et al. Mental disorders as risk factors for substance use, abuse and dependence: results from the 10-year follow-up of the National Comorbidity Survey. Addiction. 2010;105(6):1117-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02902.x. [PubMed: 20331554]. [PubMed Central: PMC2910819].

  • 26.

    Kendler KS, Prescott CA, Myers J, Neale MC. The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for common psychiatric and substance use disorders in men and women. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60(9):929-37. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.9.929. [PubMed: 12963675].

  • 27.

    Lipari RN, Van Horn SL. Trends in substance use disorders among adults aged 18 or older. The CBHSQ Report. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US). 2017.

  • 28.

    Narrow WE, Rae DS, Robins LN, Regier DA. Revised prevalence estimates of mental disorders in the United States: using a clinical significance criterion to reconcile 2 surveys' estimates. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59(2):115-23. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.2.115. [PubMed: 11825131].

  • 29.

    Ahmadi J, Hasani M. Prevalence of substance use among Iranian high school students. Addict Behav. 2003;28(2):375-9. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(01)00246-5. [PubMed: 12573688].

  • 30.

    Mohammadpoorasl A, Ghahramanloo AA, Allahverdipour H, Augner C. Substance abuse in relation to religiosity and familial support in Iranian college students. Asian J Psychiatr. 2014;9:41-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2013.12.015. [PubMed: 24813035].

  • 31.

    Oreskovich MR, Kaups KL, Balch CM, Hanks JB, Satele D, Sloan J, et al. Prevalence of alcohol use disorders among American surgeons. Arch Surg. 2012;147(2):168-74. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.1481. [PubMed: 22351913].

  • 32.

    Hasin DS, Saha TD, Kerridge BT, Goldstein RB, Chou SP, Zhang H, et al. Prevalence of Marijuana Use Disorders in the United States Between 2001-2002 and 2012-2013. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(12):1235-42. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1858. [PubMed: 26502112]. [PubMed Central: PMC5037576].

  • 33.

    Brown QL, Sarvet AL, Shmulewitz D, Martins SS, Wall MM, Hasin DS. Trends in Marijuana Use Among Pregnant and Nonpregnant Reproductive-Aged Women, 2002-2014. JAMA. 2017;317(2):207-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17383. [PubMed: 27992619]. [PubMed Central: PMC5595220].

  • 34.

    McCabe SE, Boyd CJ, Cranford JA, Teter CJ. Motives for nonmedical use of prescription opioids among high school seniors in the United States: self-treatment and beyond. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(8):739-44. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.120. [PubMed: 19652106]. [PubMed Central: PMC2975027].

  • 35.

    Rabiner DL, Anastopoulos AD, Costello EJ, Hoyle RH, McCabe SE, Swartzwelder HS. Motives and perceived consequences of nonmedical ADHD medication use by college students: are students treating themselves for attention problems? J Atten Disord. 2009;13(3):259-70. doi: 10.1177/1087054708320399. [PubMed: 18664714].

  • Copyright © 2020, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
    COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: