Corrigendum to “Evaluation of the Efficiency of Indirect Blood Pressure Measurement Methods in Comparison to Intra-Arterial Reading among Iranian Individuals” [Inter Cardiovasc Res J. 2020, 14 (3); e103852]

AUTHORS

Mahmood Emami ORCID 1 , Davood Shafie ORCID 2 , Mehrbod Vakhshoori ORCID 3 , Maryam Eghbali-Babadi ORCID 4 , Elham Ahmadipour ORCID 5 , Alireza Khosravi ORCID 6 , *

1 Medical Doctor, Cardiologist, Yazd Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yazd University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

2 Heart Failure Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran

3 Interventional Cardiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran

4 Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran

5 Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran

6 Hypertension Research Center, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran

How to Cite: Emami M, Shafie D, Vakhshoori M, Eghbali-Babadi M, Ahmadipour E, et al. Corrigendum to “Evaluation of the Efficiency of Indirect Blood Pressure Measurement Methods in Comparison to Intra-Arterial Reading among Iranian Individuals” [Inter Cardiovasc Res J. 2020, 14 (3); e103852]. Int Cardio Res J. 2030;In Press(In Press):e114521.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

International Cardiovascular Research Journal: In Press (In Press); e114521
Published Online: June 15, 2021
Article Type: Correction
Received: March 09, 2021
Accepted: April 04, 2021
READ FULL TEXT

Abstract

The authors are deeply sorry about the inadvertent
error made in the published article titled “Evaluation of
the Efficiency of Indirect Blood Pressure Measurement
Methods in Comparison to Intra-Arterial Reading
among Iranian Individuals”. The conclusion section was
mistakenly added from another article in that issue of the
International Cardiovascular Research Journal (Sep. 2020,
14 (3); e104728).
The correct conclusion is as follows:
Conclusions: The results showed that non-invasive BP
measurement methods could be used efficiently for HTN
status assessment with no significant difference with its
simultaneous intra-arterial reading. Yet, several other
studies are needed to clarify these outcomes and evaluate
the efficacy of each tool for accurate BP measurement
within different BP spectra.

Fulltext

The full-text is available in pdf.

References

  • 1.

    The references are available in pdf.

  • © 2030, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.
    COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: