The Use of Neck Sonography in Identifying Cervical Lymph Node: A Single Center Study from 2019 to 2020

AUTHORS

Azim Motamedfar ORCID 1 , Mohammad Momen Gharibvand ORCID 1 , Mojgan Sametzade ORCID 1 , Mahsa Akhavan Sabagh ORCID 1 , *

1 Department of Radiology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

How to Cite: Motamedfar A , Momen Gharibvand M , Sametzade M , Akhavan Sabagh M. The Use of Neck Sonography in Identifying Cervical Lymph Node: A Single Center Study from 2019 to 2020, Jundishapur J Chronic Dis Care. Online ahead of Print ; In Press(In Press):e112926. doi: 10.5812/jjcdc.112926.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease Care: In Press (In Press); e112926
Published Online: April 7, 2021
Article Type: Research Article
Received: January 15, 2021
Revised: January 31, 2021
Accepted: February 1, 2021
Uncorrected Proof scheduled for 10 (2)
Crossmark
Crossmark
CHECKING
READ FULL TEXT

Abstract

Background: Tumor metastasis, as one of the most important prognostic factors in solid tumors, affects survival remarkably. Cervical lymphadenopathy (LAP) reflects an advanced-stage disease and changes the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging of tumor, resulting in a multidisciplinary approach to the management of cancer.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the importance of neck sonography in monitoring primary tumors.

Methods: Records of 166 patients with distant primary cancers who underwent neck sonography from February 2019 to February 2020 were studied. Abnormal lymph nodes were reported, and then the patients underwent neck sonography and fine needle aspiration (FNA) or core needle biopsy (CNB) under direct US guidance. Thirty-two patients who were confirmed for malignant cervical LAP underwent neck lymph node biopsy as an easy and safe way to provide tissue diagnosis instead of providing biopsy from the primary source of tumor.

Results: Malignant cervical LAP was confirmed in 32 patients (19.2%) by neck sonography. Seventy-seven patients (46.4%) were male and 89 patients (53.6%) were female. The patients were 22 to 88 years old (mean age = 57.7 years; standard deviation = 12.7). Thirty-two patients (19.2%) had pathological cervical lymph nodes and 134 patients (80.8%) did not have.

Conclusions: Metastatic cervical LAP found by neck ultrasound will change pretreatment TNM staging of disease to provide optimal treatment on a case-by-case basis. According to the result of this study, routine neck sonography in patients with distant primary tumors is recommended.

1. Background

Tumor metastasis is one of the most important prognostic factors in solid tumors and survival of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is strongly affected by cervical lymph node metastasis (1, 2). HNSCC prevalence accounts for approximately 5% of all cancer types; however, in Iran, it seems to be 1% (3). cervical lymphadenopathy (LAP) in upper aerodigestive tract decreases the 5-year survival about 50% (4). Although most metastatic LAPs in the neck show metastases from head and neck primary tumors, sometimes distant primary tumors result in cervical LAP, especially to supraclavicular or inferior neck region (5, 6). In distant primary tumors, cervical LAP reflects an advanced-stage disease, making the management almost complex and causing a multidisciplinary approach to provide optimal care including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery as well as palliative care (5). In evaluating the unknown primary tumors or tumors diagnosed only by imaging techniques still lacking histologically proven evidence, metastatic cervical LAP provides an easy and safe method of biopsy resulting in accurate tissue diagnosis and finding the primary source of tumor based on immunohistochemistry (IHC), histology, and tumor markers which could be inimitable to the primary tumor (5). Most studies have been performed on the role of neck sonography in the detection of cervical LAP in head and neck cancers (7, 8). Ultrasound sonography is more sensitive to detect the contrast agents in tissue compared to fundamental imaging (9). Although ultrasound sonography is an easy, cost-effective, and safe technique to be used in diagnostic approaches (10), limited literature is available regarding the prognostic yield of neck sonography for cervical LAP in distant primary tumors.

2. Objectives

The present study aims to investigate the role of neck sonography in the detection of malignant cervical LAP in patients with distant primary tumors to show the prevalence of cervical LAP and to demonstrate the importance of routine neck sonography in patients with distant primary tumors as well as head and neck tumors.

3. Methods

3.1. Study Design

The present research is a prospective single center study performed at Golestan University Hospital, between February 2019 and February 2020. The interventional radiology unit of this hospital has routinely performed neck ultrasound in patients with cancers diagnosed by imaging techniques or/and tissue diagnosis. To examine the association between cervical LAP and distant primary tumors, demographic data including age and gender, site of cancer, and cervical lymph node status have been documented.

3.2. Inclusion Criteria

All patients with confirmed distant primary tumors who underwent neck sonography met the inclusion criteria of the present study.

3.3. Exclusion Criteria

Patients with additional chronic disease; patients with non-metastatic cancer; and patients whom demographic data were not completed, met the exclusion criteria of this study.

3.4. Procedures

Neck sonography was performed in a standardized systematic way using a 5- to 12-MHz linear probe by a sonographer. Malignant cervical lymph node was defined as the invasive characteristic of lymph nodes based on sonographic criteria. Then, abnormal lymph nodes were reported and fine needle aspiration (FNA) or core needle biopsy (CNB) was performed under direct US guidance.

3.5. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS-20 software. Quantitative variables were analyzed using t-test and chi-square test was used to analyze qualitative variables. In addition, equivalent non-parametric tests were used to assess abnormal results. In order to analyze the data, descriptive statistical methods including the frequency distribution of tables, graphs, and indices of central tendency and appropriate dispersion were described to the studied variables. The normality of the distribution of quantitative variables was checked by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to assess the correlations between qualitative variables.

3.6. Ethical Considerations

This study was approved by the local ethics committee (ethical approval code = IR.AJUMS.REC.1398.928) and patient confidentiality was maintained throughout the data collection and analysis process.

4. Results

One hundred and sixty-six confirmed cases with primary tumors were assessed using neck ultrasound in the interventional radiology unit. Thirty-two patients (19.2%) had cervical LAP (Figure 1). Seventy-seven patients (46.4%) were male and 89 (53.6%) were female (mean age = 57.7 years; standard deviation = 12.7 years). The youngest patient and the oldest patient were respectively 22 and 88 years old. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on their age to measure the frequency of age categories involved with cancer. Group 1, age < 30 years (3 cases); group 2, age between 30 and 50 years (48 cases); group 3, age between 51 and 70 years (90 cases); and group 4, age > 71 years (25 cases). The frequency of patients in group 3 was higher than other groups, representing cancer predilection to be higher in this age period (Figure 2).

Figure 1. The frequency of cervical lymphadenopathy

4.1. Gastrointestinal (GI) Tract Cancers

Sonographic assessment of 45 patients with GI tract cancers showed 8 cases having cervical LAP (17.7%) and 37 cases without cervical LAP. The highest prevalence of cervical LAP was seen in esophageal cancer (28.5%) and gastric cancer (25%) (Figure 3 and Table 1).

Figure 3. Frequency of pathological cervical lymph nodes in cancers
Table 1. The Contingency Table of LAP in GI Cancer
VariablesCervical LAPTotal
YesNo
GI cancer
No2398121
Rectosigmoid cancer189
Gastric cancer3912
Pancreas cancer123
Esophageal cancer257
Colon cancer11314
Total32134166

4.2. Breast Cancer

Forty-fivepatients had breast cancer, three of whom (6.7%) had cervical lymph node involvement (Figure 3).

4.3. Lymphoma

Twenty-three patients with lymphoma whose first presentation of disease was in their abdominal or pelvic cavity (patients with cervical node involvement as the first presentation of diseases were excluded) underwent neck ultrasound and 7 patients (31.8%) showed neck LAP.

4.4. Lung Cancer

Out of 19 patients with lung cancer, 6 (31.6%) showed pathologic cervical lymph node in neck sonography.

4.5. Urinary Tract Cancer

Sonographic assessment of 17 patients with urinary tract cancer showed that 4 patients (23.5%) had cervical LAP.

4.6. Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

None of the 5 patients with HCC showed LAP.

4.7. Uterocervical Cancer

Thirteen patients had uterocervical cancer, 2 of whom (15.3%) showed cervical pathologic lymph node.

4.8. Malignant Melanoma

Out of 2 patients with melanoma, one showed cervical LAP.

The results of neck ultrasound represented that the most common cervical zone involved with tumor metastasis was left supraclavicular region, as 25 out of 32 cases in our study with cervical lymph node involvement showed metastasis to this region.

The general results of this study indicate that in the ultrasound examination of the studied patients, the frequency of pathological cervical lymph nodes was presented; 17.7% in GI tract cancers, 6.7% in breast cancer, 31.8% in lymphoma, 31.6% in lung cancer, 0% in HCC, 50% in malignant melanoma , 15.4% in genital cancer (uterus and cervix), and 23.5% in genitourinary tract cancers.

Also, among 166 patients studied in the present research, 8 patients (4.8%) showed axillary lymph node involvement due to metastasis (7 had breast cancer and 1 had lymophoma). None of these patients had concomitant lymph node involvement (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Evaluation of metastatic axillary lymph node involvement

According to the results of cervical ultrasound in patients with cancer, the most common cervical area affected by tumor metastasis was the left supraclavicular region (Figure 5).

Figure 5. Involvement of different cervical zones in lymphatic metastasis to the cervical chain

Out of 7 patients having lymphoma with cervical metastasis, 5 had left supraclavicular involvement and 2 had zone 4 involvement.

Two patients with esophageal cancer had cervical metastasis, 1 had left supraclavicular involvement, and the other had zone 4 involvement. In 3 cases having gastric cancer with cervical metastasis, two had left supraclavicular involvement and one had bilateral supraclavicular involvement. In one patient, mitral regurgitation of the pancreas was also observed in left supraclavicular. Supraclavicular involvement was also observed in both patients with colon and rectal cancer.

Left supraclavicular involvement was observed in all 3 patients with breast cancer.

Bilateral zone 5 involvement was observed in 1 patient having melanoma with cervical metastasis.

Cervical involvement was observed in 6 patients with cancer as zone 4 in one person, left supraclavicular in 4 patients, and zone 2 in one patient. cervical involvementin 4 patients with genitourinary tract cancer was a bilateral supraclavicular involvement in one patient with prostate cancer to prostate cancer and left supraclavicular involvement in other 3 patients with bladder, prostate, and renal cell cancer (RCC). Cervical involvement was observed in 2 patients with cervical concussion, as zone 4 involvement in one patient and left supraclavicular in another patient.

5. Discussion

In this case series study, 19.2% of patients (32/166) with distant primary cancers had confirmed malignant cervical LAP following neck ultrasound. In this study, the most common cervical lymph nodes affected by malignant cells in breast cancer are supraclavicular. Supraclavicular lymph node metastasis is a poor prognostic factor which represents stage IV disease, suggesting aggressive treatment including chemotherapy, surgery, and post-operative chemotherapy based on Brito et al.’s study (11). The results of this study showed that 31.6% of patients with lung cancer had malignant cervical LAP based on neck sonography. These findings are consistent with the results reported by Davis et al., reporting the frequency of cervical lymph node involvement from 1.5 to 32% (12). The variety of frequency is possibly due to the assessment of cervical node without site specification. Also, the results documented in Ahmed et al.’s study showed a similar frequency, 39.8% (13). Approximately, 28% of esophageal cancers showed cervical LAP in this study. This was about 20 to 30% based on the results reported by Nakagawa et al. (14). Detection of pathologic cervical lymph nodes by ultrasound causes the alteration of pretreatment TNM staging (T describes the size of the tumor and any spread of cancer into nearby tissue; N describes the spread of cancer into nearby lymph nodes; and M describes metastasis) of esophageal cancer. Twenty-eight percent of patients with clinically non-palpable lymph node were finally found to have cervical LAP following neck ultrasound (15). Also, metastatic cervical lymph node in patients with gastric cancer was 25%, different from Bhatia et al.’s study in 2009 that reported cervical lymph node involvement in 3% of cases affected by gastric cancer (16). Pritchyk et al. reported that the most common infraclavicular tumor which metastasizes to the head and neck just after breast and lung cancers is renal cell carcinoma (17). In our study, out of 8 patients with prostate cancer 2 cases with bone metastasis (i.e. stage 4) showed cervical LAP in neck ultrasound. Cervical metastasis by bladder urothelial carcinomas is too rare, suggestive of extensive metastatic disease and poor prognosis (18). In our study, one patient with bladder carcinoma and extensive pelvic metastasis underwent neck sonography, showing cervical LAP due to underlying extensive pelvic metastasis. The findings reported by Henriksen et al. have represented the prevalence of cervical node involvement in nearly 0.1 to 1.5 % of patients with cervix cancer (19) which has increased to 8% when assessed by fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) (20). The result of our research showed approximately 22% of patients with neck metastasis by cervix cancer. Also, in Oosaki et al.’s study, metastasis to supraclavicular nodes by endometrial cancer was rare, reported in 0.15% of cases (21), which is consistent with the result of our study, with no case of cervical lymph node metastasis involved by endometrial carcinoma.

There was poor evidence regarding the prevalence of cervical LAP in malignant melanoma, and unfortunately, the sample volume in our study was too low to be reliable for the assessment of prevalence of cervical LAP, although out of 2 patients with malignant melanoma one was found to have cervical node involvement.

5.1. Conclusion

Although most metastatic lymph nodes in the neck represent metastases from primary tumors of the head and neck, sometimes-distant primary tumors result in cervical LAP and changing pretreatment TNM staging and therefore different methods of treatment.

In this case series study on patients with distant primary cancers, routine neck ultrasound performed by interventional radiologists revealed malignant cervical LAP in 19.2% of cases (32/166).

These patients underwent neck lymph node biopsy instead of providing biopsy from abdominopelvic visceral organs, vertebrae, pleura and lungs. In fact, taking a biopsy from the primary source of tumor is not occasionally accessible well due to the small size of mass, depth of tumor, its location or post-biopsy consequences such as bleeding, vascular rupture, etc. Taking biopsies from metastatic cervical lymph nodes is almost safe due to lack of the mentioned disadvantages and is done more easily and highly accurate, resulting in accurate tissue diagnosis which is necessary to provide optimal treatment recommendations, including consideration for surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormonal, or biological therapy as well as palliative care when necessary. Based on the results of this research, we recommend routine neck sonograohy in patients with infraclavicular primary tumors. Given the limited literature regarding the prognostic yield of neck sonography for cervical LAP in distant primary tumors, we suggest further research in this field.

Acknowledgements

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Smith GI, O'Brien CJ, Clark J, Shannon KF, Clifford AR, McNeil EB, et al. Management of the neck in patients with T1 and T2 cancer in the mouth. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;42(6):494-500. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2004.06.013. [PubMed: 15544877].

  • 2.

    Mastronikolis NS, Fitzgerald D, Owen C, Neary Z, Glaholm J, Watkinson JC. The management of squamous cell carcinoma of the neck. The Birmingham UK experience. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31(5):461-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.01.015. [PubMed: 15922880].

  • 3.

    Arianpoor A, Asadi M, Amini E, Ziaeemehr A, Ahmadi Simab S, Zakavi SR. Investigating the prevalence of risk factors of papillary thyroid carcinoma recurrence and disease-free survival after thyroidectomy and central neck dissection in Iranian patients. Acta Chir Belg. 2020;120(3):173-8. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2019.1576447. [PubMed: 31237189].

  • 4.

    Hahn SS, Spaulding CA, Kim JA, Constable WC. The prognostic significance of lymph node involvement in pyriform sinus and supraglottic cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1987;13(8):1143-7. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(87)90186-6. [PubMed: 3610702].

  • 5.

    Lopez F, Rodrigo JP, Silver CE, Haigentz MJ, Bishop JA, Strojan P, et al. Cervical lymph node metastases from remote primary tumor sites. Head Neck. 2016;38 Suppl 1:E2374-85. doi: 10.1002/hed.24344. [PubMed: 26713674]. [PubMed Central: PMC4991634].

  • 6.

    Ellison E, LaPuerta P, Martin SE. Supraclavicular masses: Results of a series of 309 cases biopsied by fine needle aspiration. Head Neck. 1999;21(3):239-46. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199905)21:3<239::aid-hed9>3.0.co;2-b. [PubMed: 10208667].

  • 7.

    Jose J, Coatesworth AP, MacLennan K. Cervical metastases in upper aerodigestive tract squamous cell carcinoma: Histopathologic analysis and reporting. Head Neck. 2003;25(3):194-7. doi: 10.1002/hed.10194. [PubMed: 12599286].

  • 8.

    Duvvuri U, Simental AAJ, D'Angelo G, Johnson JT, Ferris RL, Gooding W, et al. Elective neck dissection and survival in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(12):2228-34. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000149464.73080.20. [PubMed: 15564851].

  • 9.

    Frinking PJ, Bouakaz A, Kirkhorn J, Ten Cate FJ, de Jong N. Ultrasound contrast imaging: Current and new potential methods. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;26(6):965-75. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(00)00229-5. [PubMed: 10996696].

  • 10.

    Voigt JU. Ultrasound molecular imaging. Methods. 2009;48(2):92-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.03.011. [PubMed: 19324089].

  • 11.

    Brito RA, Valero V, Buzdar AU, Booser DJ, Ames F, Strom E, et al. Long-term results of combined-modality therapy for locally advanced breast cancer with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases: The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(3):628-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.628. [PubMed: 11157012].

  • 12.

    Davis RS, Flynn MB, Moore C. An unusual presentation of carcinoma of the lung: 26 patients with cervical node metastases. J Surg Oncol. 1977;9(5):503-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930090513. [PubMed: 592850].

  • 13.

    Ahmed M, Flannery A, Daneshvar C, Breen D. PET and neck ultrasound for the detection of cervical lymphadenopathy in patients with lung cancer and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Respiration. 2018;96(2):138-43. doi: 10.1159/000487957. [PubMed: 29975966].

  • 14.

    Nakagawa S, Nishimaki T, Kosugi S, Ohashi M, Kanda T, Hatakeyama K. Cervical lymphadenectomy is beneficial for patients with carcinoma of the upper and mid-thoracic esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2003;16(1):4-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.2003.00286.x. [PubMed: 12581247].

  • 15.

    Griffith JF, Chan AC, Ahuja AT, Leung SF, Chow LT, Chung SC, et al. Neck ultrasound in staging squamous oesophageal carcinoma - A high yield technique. Clin Radiol. 2000;55(9):696-701. doi: 10.1053/crad.2000.0502. [PubMed: 10988048].

  • 16.

    Bhatia KS, Griffith JF, Ahuja AT. Stomach cancer: prevalence and significance of neck nodal metastases on sonography. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(8):1968-72. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1372-z. [PubMed: 19259677].

  • 17.

    Pritchyk KM, Schiff BA, Newkirk KA, Krowiak E, Deeb ZE. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma to the head and neck. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(9):1598-602. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200209000-00012. [PubMed: 12352670].

  • 18.

    Pusztaszeri M, Douaihy N, Pelte MF, Pache JC. Cervical lymph node metastasis of a micropapillary carcinoma of the bladder: A case report with fine-needle aspiration cytology and differential diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol. 2013;41(7):617-9. doi: 10.1002/dc.22845. [PubMed: 22351519].

  • 19.

    Henriksen E. The lymphatic spread of carcinoma of the cervix and of the body of the uterus; A study of 420 necropsies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1949;58(5):924-42. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(49)90200-8. [PubMed: 15392961].

  • 20.

    Tran BN, Grigsby PW, Dehdashti F, Herzog TJ, Siegel BA. Occult supraclavicular lymph node metastasis identified by FDG-PET in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;90(3):572-6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00402-5. [PubMed: 13678726].

  • 21.

    Oosaki T, Hirono M, Hayashi Y, Yoshihara T, Suzuki M. The therapy for the neck lymphonodi metastasis of gynecologic malignancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;73:357-60.

  • Copyright © 2021, Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease Care. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
    COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: