The First Report of Prevalence of Class 1-3 Integrons in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in Southwestern Iran: A Multicenter Study

AUTHORS

Seyed Mohsen Hosseini 1 , Nahal Hadi 1 , 2 , * , Abdollah Bazargani 1 , Amir Emami 3 , Neda Pirbonyeh 3

1 Department of Bacteriology and Virology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

3 Burn and Wound Healing Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran

How to Cite: Hosseini S M , Hadi N , Bazargani A , Emami A , Pirbonyeh N . The First Report of Prevalence of Class 1-3 Integrons in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in Southwestern Iran: A Multicenter Study, Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2019 ; 12(11):e90902. doi: 10.5812/jjm.90902.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology: 12 (11); e90902
Published Online: February 2, 2020
Article Type: Research Article
Received: February 21, 2019
Revised: January 19, 2020
Accepted: January 23, 2020
Crossmark
Crossmark
CHECKING
READ FULL TEXT

Abstract

Background: Staphylococcus aureus is one of the main causes of a wide range of nosocomial infections, like the infection of the skin and soft tissue.

Objectives: The present study aimed to investigate the occurrence of antibiotic resistance and the presence of class 1-3 integrons in S. aureus strains isolated from hospitalized patients.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out during six months in two major hospitals in southwestern Iran. Totally, 134 isolates of S. aureus were identified by phenotypic and molecular methods. A disk diffusion method was used to determine the antibiotic resistance pattern of S. aureus isolates. The detection of integron-encoding genes was performed by the PCR method.

Results: Based on antibiotic susceptibility testing, 58 (43.2%) of 134 isolates of S. aureus were reported as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) using cefoxitin disc diffusion and mecA gene detection. The highest resistance was seen to tetracycline (48.5%). The results were analyzed by the chi-square test and there was a significant difference (P value < 0.05) between antibiotic resistance in methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) isolates. Molecular analysis showed that 53 (39.6%), 5 (3.7%), and none of the isolates were positive for class 1, 2, and 3 integrons, respectively.

Conclusions: The results indicated the remarkable rate of class 1 integrons in the clinical isolates of S. aureus in our region and the importance of investigating the prevalence of antibiotic resistance among them. However, these data alone cannot confirm the association between integrons and the presence of antibiotic resistance genes.

1. Background

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most important pathogens for humans and the second most common cause of nosocomial infections (1, 2). Staphylococcal infections occur continuously in hospitalized patients and have severe consequences ranging from superficial skin and soft tissue infections to severe systematic infections (3). The increasing trend of antibiotic-resistant strains of S. aureus, mostly methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), is a significant concern toward the management of related diseases (4, 5). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus is an important cause of hospital-acquired infections because of rapidly adapting to selective pressures encountered in hospital environments. Understanding antibiotic resistance mechanisms can be useful to overcome the emergence of methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA)strains (6).

The transfer of antibiotic resistance genes by horizontal gene transfer promotes antibiotic resistance among bacteria, which, in turn, complicates the treatment processes of the infections (7). Antibiotic resistance genes are located on the various types of DNA mobilizing elements, such as plasmids, transposons, integrons, or phages (8, 9). Integrons are one of the key systems and primary factors involved in the transfer of multidrug resistance elements among bacteria. Integrons selectively receive and remove various drug resistance gene packages and transfer them to other bacterial strains, which, in fact, accelerates the transmission of drug resistance distribution (10, 11).

The important compositions of an integron element include the intI gene encoding a site-specific recombinase according to the integrase family and an adjacent site named att, which is identified by integrase and is a receptor for gene cassettes (10). The dispersion of antibiotic resistance genes due to the presence of integrons has become a major problem in treating infections caused by pathogenic bacteria (11). In this regard, their importance has also been noted in the dissemination of antibiotic resistance among Gram-positive pathogens, particularly S. aureus (12).

2. Objectives

Because of the importance of the presence of integrons as the main option for facilitating the transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in bacteria and shortcomings in reported papers from our region, the present study aimed to evaluate the presence of integrons and their relationships with antibiotic resistance in clinical isolates of S. aureus isolated from hospitalized patients.

3. Methods

3.1. Study Design and Bacterial Isolation

In this cross-sectional study during the first six months of 2017, a total of 134 clinical isolates of S. aureus from two major hospitals of Nemazee and Ghotboddin Shirazi were collected from different clinical specimens. Colonies were characterized as S. aureus by standard microbiological tests including positive reactions of catalase, Dnase, tube coagulase, and mannitol fermentation on the Mannitol salt agar. Then, all the isolates were confirmed by the mecA gene-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (13). The identified isolates were kept at -80ºC for further experiments.

3.2. Antibiotic Susceptibility Test

Staphylococcus aureus isolates were evaluated for antibiotic susceptibility by the disk diffusion technique on Mueller-Hinton agar according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (14). The results were documented after incubation for 16 - 18 hours at 35ºC. The used antibiotics included tetracycline: T (30 μg), rifampin: RP (5 μg), tobramycin: TN (10 μg), cefoxitin: CX (30 μg), gentamicin: Gm (10 μg), erythromycin: E (15 μg), clindamycin: CD (2 μg), ciprofloxacin: CIP (5 μg), and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim: SXT (30 μg). The breakpoints for antibiotic susceptibility were determined based on the CLSI recommendation.

3.3. Genomic DNA Extraction

The phenol-chloroform method previously introduced by Sambrook and Russell was used for whole genomic DNA extraction (15). The extracted DNA was washed with 70% ethanol and dissolved in 50 μL of TE buffer (10 mM Tris; 1 mM EDTA, pH 8). The solution was ultimately stored at -20ºC for storage. Finally, 1 μL of stored DNA was used as a template in the PCR.

3.4. Identification of Staphylococcus aureus

The phenotypic characterized S. aureus and MRSA were confirmed molecularly by the detection of the mecA gene using primers described in the study by Zhang et al. (13). The amplification of DNA was performed using thermal cycler 5530 (Eppendorf master, Germany) in a total volume of 25 μL in the following condition: 5 min at 95ºC for initial denaturation, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94ºC for 60 s, annealing for 45 s (varying based on the sequences of primers), 1 min at 72ºC for extension, and 5 min at 72ºC for final extension. Electrophoresis of amplicons was used by the 1.5% agarose gel prepared in 1X TAE (Tris/Acetate/EDTA) buffer and visualized through UV transillumination after staining with safe stain load dye (CinnaGen Co., Iran).

3.5. Identification of Integrons

All isolates were tested to identify class 1-3 integrons using primers described in the study by Barraud et al. designed for the intI genes (16). The amplification of DNA was performed using the method described in section 3.4.

3.6. Statistical Analysis

The chi-square or Fisher exact test was performed to analyze the results as appropriate by SPSS software, version 21.0 (IBM Corp., USA). The categorical results were expressed as the percentages of the group in terms of relative frequency. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

4. Results

Totally, during the study period, 134 isolates of S. aureus from different wards of the study hospitals were collected and all of them were identified as S. aureus by phenotypic detection and the presence of the eap gene. Out of 134 S. aureus isolates included in our study, 80 (59.7%) and 54 (40.3%) isolates were obtained from male and female patients, respectively. The most frequent source of bacterial isolation was from respiratory tract infections (RTIs; 37.3%), followed by bloodstream infection (BSI; 23.9%), skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs; 21.6%), urinary tract infection (UTI; 11.9%), eye infection (2.2%), abdominal infection (2.2%), and meningitis (0.7%). Based on the results of antibiotic susceptibility testing, 58 (43.2%) of 134 isolates of S. aureus were reported as MRSA using cefoxitin disc diffusion and mecA gene detection. The highest resistance was seen to tetracycline (48.5%) and the lowest to clindamycin (41.8%). The full results of the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of isolates classified by MRSA and MSSA are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Prevalence of Antibiotic Resistance by MRSA and MSSA (%)
AntibioticMRSAMSSAP ValueTotal
Gentamicin79.323.7< 0.00147.8
Tobramycin6926.30.00844.8
Tetracycline55.243.4< 0.00148.5
Rifampin77.618.4< 0.00144.0
Erythromycin55.232.90.0142.5
Clindamycin44.839.50.02941.8
Ciprofloxacin70.722.4< 0.00143.3
Co-trimoxazole72.426.30.01746.3

Molecular analysis showed that 53 (39.6%) and 5 (3.7%) S. aureus isolates were positive for class 1 and 2 integrons, respectively. Meanwhile, none of the isolates contained class 3 integron encoding genes. Meanwhile, 5 (3.7%) isolates (four from RTIs and one from UTI) contained both int1 and intI2 genes. The distribution of MRSA strains and S. aureus isolates containing class 1 and 2 integrons in different infection sources is presented in Table 2. The number and percentage of positive and negative strains in terms of the presence of class 1 integron in strains with antibiotic resistance, individually for each antibiotic, are shown in Table 3.

Table 2. Distribution of MRSA Strains and Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Containing Class 1 and 2 Integrons in Different Infection Sources
Infection Source (N)MRSA, %Class 1 Integrons, %Class 2 Integrons, %
Respiratory tract infection (50)46488
Bloodstream infection (32)5018.80
Skin and soft tissue infection (29)3144.80
Urinary tract infection (16)50506.3
Eye infection (3)33.333.30
Abdominal infection (3)33.333.30
Meningitis (1)000
Table 3. Number and Percentage of Positive and Negative Strains in Terms of Presence of Class 1 Integron in Strains with Antibiotic Resistance, Individually for Each Antibiotic
AntibioticIntegron-Negative, No. (%)Integron-Positive, No. (%)P Value
Tetracycline 36 (26.9)29 (21.7)0.789
Rifampin 34 (25.4)25 (18.7)< 0.001
Tobramycin 37 (27.6)24 (17.9)< 0.001
Gentamicin 38 (28.4)26 (19.4)0.059
Erythromycin 31 (23.1)26 (19.4)0.358
Clindamycin 34 (25.4)22 (16.4)0.003
Ciprofloxacin 34 (25.4)24 (17.9)0.001
Co-trimoxazole40 (29.9)22 (16.4)0.001

5. Discussion

In this hospital-based survey, we investigated the occurrence of prevalent integrons in clinical isolates of S. aureus isolated from two major hospitals in southwestern Iran. Staphylococcus aureus, particularly MRSA, is one of the most important human pathogenic bacteria (17). With the introduction of various antibiotics, the mortality rate of infections caused by this bacterium was reduced, but nowadays, this bacterium is becoming resistant to many current antibiotics by improving its resistance mechanisms (17). The transfer rate of drug resistance genes by using horizontal gene transfer can speed up the process of displacement of drug resistance genes (18, 19). Our findings indicated that 43.2% of all samples obtained from different wards of hospitals were MRSA isolates. In this regard, 35.2% of S. aureus isolates examined in a study in Ahvaz (2016), southwestern Iran, were considered as MRSA (20). The MRSA rate in another study performed among burn patients in Ahvaz (2012) was estimated to be 86.4% that compared to our study showed a much higher value (21). In a study conducted in China in 2009, from 186 isolates of S. aureus, 67.9% were MRSA (22). These differences may be due to variations in geographical distribution, sample size, and source of infections.

In the present study, the resistance pattern of nine locally available antibiotics against clinical isolates of S. aureus was determined. The overall resistance rates of the tested antibiotics were almost the same; however, among MRSA isolates, the most effective agent was clindamycin, followed by erythromycin and tetracycline. Among MSSA isolates, the most effective agents were rifampicin, followed by ciprofloxacin. Therefore, these options can be recommended for the management of staphylococcal infections in our region by considering the cost-effectiveness of the used antibiotics. Although the antibiotic resistance pattern of S. aureus can be varied in different geographic regions or even within hospitals in the same region, there are several results in Iran and other countries comparable with our findings (22-24).

To best of our knowledge, this study for the first time reports the occurrence of class 1 integrons (39.6%) and class 2 integrons (3.7%) in clinical isolates of S. aureus in Shiraz, southwestern Iran. Integrons not commonly occur in Gram-positive bacteria, but integrons with the ability to transmit resistance determinants have a high capacity for dissemination within bacteria. Therefore, any effort to determine the burden of integrons-positive bacteria has a vital role in the blockage of the emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant strains (12). The diverse nature of integrons among different types of Gram-positive bacteria or sources in the literature is almost undeniable, but as a general concept from those studies, class 1 integron is the predominant type of integrons that is likely to play a role in antibiotic resistance of resistant strains (2, 12, 23-25).

5.1. Conclusions

As far as we know, this study is the first study that showed the prevalence of integrons in S. aureus in Shiraz, southwestern Iran. On the other hand, the information obtained from this study shows the high number of positive strains for integrons in nosocomial isolates of S. aureus. These data alone cannot confirm the association between integrons and the presence of antibiotic resistance genes. Furthermore, our findings highlight the relevance of investigating the spread of drug resistance genes in S. aureus for controlling its dissemination through the hospital environments.

Acknowledgements

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Gordon RJ, Lowy FD. Pathogenesis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46 Suppl 5:S350-9. doi: 10.1086/533591. [PubMed: 18462090]. [PubMed Central: PMC2474459].

  • 2.

    Yahaghi E, Imani Fooladi AA, Amin M, Mirnejad R, Nezamzade R, Amani J. Detection of class I integrons in Staphyloacoccus aurous isolated from clinical samples. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16(11). e16234. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.16234. [PubMed: 25763211]. [PubMed Central: PMC4329933].

  • 3.

    Shen HN, Lu CL. Skin and soft tissue infections in hospitalized and critically ill patients: A nationwide population-based study. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:151. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-151. [PubMed: 20525332]. [PubMed Central: PMC2894834].

  • 4.

    Raygada JL, Levine DP. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A growing risk in the hospital and in the community. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2009;2(2):86-95. [PubMed: 25126276]. [PubMed Central: PMC4115307].

  • 5.

    Hasannejad-Bibalan M, Mojtahedi A, Biglari H, Halaji M, Sedigh Ebrahim-Saraie H. Antibacterial activity of tedizolid, a novel oxazolidinone against methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb Drug Resist. 2019;25(9):1330-7. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2018.0457. [PubMed: 31290721].

  • 6.

    Ebrahim-Saraie HS, Motamedifar M, Sarvari J, Hoseini Alfatemi SM. Emergence of SCCmec type I obtained from clinical samples in Shiraz teaching hospitals, south-west of Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8(6). e16998. doi: 10.5812/jjm.16998v2. [PubMed: 26322200]. [PubMed Central: PMC4549488].

  • 7.

    Lerminiaux NA, Cameron ADS. Horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in clinical environments. Can J Microbiol. 2019;65(1):34-44. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2018-0275. [PubMed: 30248271].

  • 8.

    Bennett PM. Plasmid encoded antibiotic resistance: Acquisition and transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in bacteria. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;153 Suppl 1:S347-57. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707607. [PubMed: 18193080]. [PubMed Central: PMC2268074].

  • 9.

    Ploy MC, Lambert T, Couty JP, Denis F. Integrons: An antibiotic resistance gene capture and expression system. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2000;38(6):483-7. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2000.070. [PubMed: 10987194].

  • 10.

    Domingues S, da Silva GJ, Nielsen KM. Integrons: Vehicles and pathways for horizontal dissemination in bacteria. Mob Genet Elements. 2012;2(5):211-23. doi: 10.4161/mge.22967. [PubMed: 23550063]. [PubMed Central: PMC3575428].

  • 11.

    Stalder T, Barraud O, Casellas M, Dagot C, Ploy MC. Integron involvement in environmental spread of antibiotic resistance. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:119. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00119. [PubMed: 22509175]. [PubMed Central: PMC3321497].

  • 12.

    Deng Y, Bao X, Ji L, Chen L, Liu J, Miao J, et al. Resistance integrons: Class 1, 2 and 3 integrons. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2015;14:45. doi: 10.1186/s12941-015-0100-6. [PubMed: 26487554]. [PubMed Central: PMC4618277].

  • 13.

    Zhang K, McClure JA, Elsayed S, Louie T, Conly JM. Novel multiplex PCR assay for characterization and concomitant subtyping of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec types I to V in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(10):5026-33. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.10.5026-5033.2005. [PubMed: 16207957]. [PubMed Central: PMC1248471].

  • 14.

    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2016.

  • 15.

    Sambrook J, Russell DW. Purification of nucleic acids by extraction with phenol:chloroform. CSH Protoc. 2006;2006(1). doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot4455. [PubMed: 22485786].

  • 16.

    Barraud O, Baclet MC, Denis F, Ploy MC. Quantitative multiplex real-time PCR for detecting class 1, 2 and 3 integrons. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(8):1642-5. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq167. [PubMed: 20542899].

  • 17.

    Hardy KJ, Hawkey PM, Gao F, Oppenheim BA. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the critically ill. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92(1):121-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh008. [PubMed: 14665563].

  • 18.

    van Belkum A, Kluytmans J, van Leeuwen W, Bax R, Quint W, Peters E, et al. Multicenter evaluation of arbitrarily primed PCR for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33(6):1537-47. [PubMed: 7650182]. [PubMed Central: PMC228211].

  • 19.

    Gu B, Pan S, Wang T, Zhao W, Mei Y, Huang P, et al. Novel cassette arrays of integrons in clinical strains of Enterobacteriaceae in China. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008;32(6):529-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.06.019. [PubMed: 18778917].

  • 20.

    Darban-Sarokhalil D, Khoramrooz SS, Marashifard M, Malek Hosseini SA, Parhizgari N, Yazdanpanah M, et al. Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from southwest of Iran using spa and SCCmec typing methods. Microb Pathog. 2016;98:88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.07.003. [PubMed: 27392699].

  • 21.

    Parhizgari N, Khoramrooz SS, Malek Hosseini SA, Marashifard M, Yazdanpanah M, Emaneini M, et al. High frequency of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with SCCmec type III and Spa types t037 and t631 isolated from burn patients in southwest of Iran. APMIS. 2016;124(3):221-8. doi: 10.1111/apm.12493. [PubMed: 26709106].

  • 22.

    Ren C, Zhao Y, Shen Y. Analysis of the effect of integrons on drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by multiplex PCR detection. Mol Med Rep. 2013;7(3):719-24. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2013.1284. [PubMed: 23337960]. [PubMed Central: PMC3597458].

  • 23.

    Namvar AE, Khodaei F, Bijari A, Lari AR. Detection of integrons and Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome (SCCmec) types in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from burn and non-burn patients. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2015;9(4):440-5. [PubMed: 26715924]. [PubMed Central: PMC4682599].

  • 24.

    Goudarzi H, Seyedjavadi SS, E Udo E, Beiranvand E, Fazeli M, Goudarzi M. Molecular characterization and distribution of class 1 integron-bearing methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus strains in burn patients, Tehran, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2016;10(2). doi: 10.5812/jjm.40592.

  • 25.

    Xu Z, Shi L, Zhang C, Zhang L, Li X, Cao Y, et al. Nosocomial infection caused by class 1 integron-carrying Staphylococcus aureus in a hospital in South China. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13(10):980-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01782.x. [PubMed: 17803751].

  • Copyright © 2020, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
    COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: