Salvia Officinalis Protects Pancreatic Beta-cells Against Streptozotocin-Induced Damage; A Stereological Study

AUTHORS

Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani ORCID 1 , Ali Noorafshan 2 , Alireza Ebrahimi ORCID 3 , Maryam Bahmani-Jahromi 3 , Mohammad-Hossein Imanieh 3 , Sedigheh Ebrahimi ORCID 4 , * , Sahar Hosseini ORCID 3 , Nader Tanideh 5

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts general hospital, Harvard medical school, Boston, MA

2 Histomorphometry & Stereology Research Centre, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

3 Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

4 Department of Medical Ethics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

5 Department of Pharmacology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

How to Cite: Ashkani-Esfahani S, Noorafshan A, Ebrahimi A, Bahmani-Jahromi M , Imanieh M , et al. Salvia Officinalis Protects Pancreatic Beta-cells Against Streptozotocin-Induced Damage; A Stereological Study. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2022;17(1):e109906. doi: 10.5812/jjnpp.109906.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products: 17 (1); e109906
Published Online: September 8, 2021
Article Type: Research Article
Received: October 2, 2020
Revised: May 13, 2021
Accepted: May 14, 2021
Crossmark
Crossmark
CHECKING
READ FULL TEXT

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease, progressing due to inadequate secretion of insulin by pancreas. Salvia officinalis (SVO) has anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative potentials, which may be beneficial in regulating underlying causes of DM.

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to estimate the protective effects of SVO against Streptozotocin (STZ)-induced pancreatic injury in rat models of DM.

Methods: Forty-eight male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups (n = 12); C1: normal group with no treatment, C2: diabetic group with no treatment, E1: diabetic group treated with 200 mg/kg of the SVO extract, and E2: diabetic group treated with 400 mg/kg of the SVO extract. All groups received a single dose of STZ on day 7 except C1. Pancreas volume, shrinkage, volume densities of the islets, numerical densities, and volume of the beta cells were measured using stereological methods.

Results: Blood sugar (BS) levels were significantly lower in SVO-treated groups comparing to C2 group. Also, volume densities and total number of islets and beta cells in E1 and E2 groups were higher than C2 (P < 0.05), but lower than C1 (P < 0.05). Volume densities of the islets and beta cells, and total number of beta cells in E1, and volume densities of the islets and beta cells in E2 groups were considerably higher than C2 group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Our result showed the beneficial effects of SVO extract regarding pancreatic damage. We concluded that SVO might be prescribed as a therapeutic food supplement for patients with diabetes.

1. Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease, which is considered a growing health concern and affects nearly 470 million individuals worldwide (1). The underlying causes of the disease may include a range of problems such as autoimmune reactions, impaired antioxidant defense, disrupted anti-inflammatory responses, and increased oxidative stress (2). It seems that DM-caused complications such as retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy are mainly affected by excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidative stress.

Several plant-derived medicines have been suggested for the treatment of DM, according to different ethnomedicines (3, 4). For example, Trigonella foenumgraecum, Allium sativum, Allium cepa, and Curcuma longa showed anti-diabetic potentials in previous investigations, which may be associated with their antioxidant activities (5-7). Salvia officinalis (SVO) is a plant from Lamiaceae family, and it was reported that SVO has anti-inflammatory, anti-bacterial, and anti-mutagenic, and anti-hyperglycemic effects (8-12). Previous studies have evaluated the anti-diabetic effect of SVO, which was found to be promising (12, 13). This could be because of the previously confirmed anti-oxidative potentials of SVO, which regulate many enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase (14-16).

2. Objectives

The present study was designed to determine the protective effects of Salvia officinalis (SVO) extract administration in Streptozotocin (STZ)-induced pancreatic injury in rat models using quantitative stereological methods.

3. Methods

3.1. Preparing the Extract

Salvia officinalis (SVO) leaves were collected from Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province, south-west of Iran, in Summer, and it was authenticated (Voucher number: 157) at the research department of Agriculture and Natural Resources Engineering Organization of Yasuj, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad, Iran. The leaves were dried at 50°C and ground into powder. The powder (120 g) was being mixed and extracted with 600 mL ethanol aqueous solution (80:20) in a Soxhlet apparatus for 72 h. At the end of the extraction process, the solvent was filtered and evaporated by a rotary evaporator. The yield of the extract was calculated at 16%. The obtained SVO alcoholic extract was stored at -18°C until usage.

3.2. Subjects and Experimental Design

Forty-eight male normoglycemic Sprague-Dawley rats (weighted 230 ± 20 g) were kept in cages with free access to adequate water and food, and a temperature of 24 ± 2°C, as well as 12 h dark/light cycles. We randomly divided the rats into four groups (n = 12). The first group consisted of non-diabetic normal rats (C1) that were solely received 1 cc per oral distilled water daily with no other treatment. The second control group consisted of non-treated STZ-received diabetic rats (C2) receiving 1 cc per oral distilled water daily. The first experimental group (E1) received 200 mg/kg of the bodyweight of the SVO extract dissolved in distilled water via gastric intubation daily; the second experimental group (E2) also received 400 mg/kg of the SVO extract orally dissolved in distilled water daily. These doses were chosen according to a previously published article on the anti-diabetic effects of SVO extract (17).

All groups received a single dose of STZ on day 7, except for C1. We administered STZ on day 7 to let the animals spend seven days receiving the treatments as a part of their routine. The goal of this was to show the preventive effect of our treatments and to show that if these treatments are used in diet, they can or cannot lead to reduction of the chance of developing diabetes. Furthermore, the designed treatments were administered for the rats (except for C1 group that receives only distilled water) every day from day 1 to day 14.

3.3. Streptozotocin (STZ) Administration and Detection of Hyperglycemia

Streptozotocin (STZ) is a toxic agent that disrupts the function of insulin-producing beta cells, and it has been used in previous studies to induce DM in animal models (18-21). After an overnight fasting period, rats were injected intraperitoneally with a single dosage of 60 mg/kg body weight of STZ (Sigma-Aldrich®, Steinhelm, Germany). The blood sugar (BS) levels of the rats were tested by glucometer (Rightest GM110, Bionime™; Switzerland) every day during the injection of STZ (day 7 to day 14). Animal models, which showed a BS level of ≥ 300 mg/dL were labeled as diabetic (20, 21).

3.4. Pancreas Volume and Shrinkage Estimation

After sacrificing the animal models at the end of the investigation, rats’ pancreases were dissected by surgical procedures. Fatty and connective tissues were cleaned from removed pancreases, and primary volume (V primary) of the pancreases was measured. The samples were embedded in a paraffin block, 5 µm and 12µm sections were obtained and stained with Gomori's Aldehyde Fuchsin stain (Figure 1) (22). During the tissue processing, the final volume of the pancreases was also measured according to Cavalieri method (23). Moreover, isotropic uniform randomized (IUR) sectioning of the specimens was used to estimate shrinkage volume according to orientator method (24). The degree of shrinkage [d(sh)] was estimated using the following equation:

d(sh) = 1  APBP 1.5

As the BP is that before the processing and the AP is the area of each sections after the processing.

Figure 1. The Langerhans islets in the pancreatic tissue. “a” shows a Langerhans islet (140×), arrows show pancreatic beta cells (3400×). The tissue was stained with modified Aldehyde Fuchsin for analysis.

3.5. The Pancreatic Islets’ Volume Density

Microscopic analysis of the samples was done by a video-microscopy framework, consisting of a microscope (E-200, Nikon™, Japan) connected to a visual camera and a monitor. The volume densities (Vv) of the islets were evaluated at the magnification of 340× by using the 5 µm thickness sections and the point counting stereological method (Figure 2). The formula of measuring the Vv of the islets in this study was as the following:

Vv =PisletPreference

as P (reference) was the number of points hitting on the reference space and P (islet) was the number of points hitting the profiles of the islets.

Figure 2. The pancreatic islets’ volume density (Vv) was measured using point-counting technique by means of a video microscopy system. A systematic random method was applied to select microscopic field of each slide, then, at that point, being investigated. Total amounts of points touching the islets are counted and divided by total amounts of points touching the whole tissue. The marks are counted in the case that the right upper corner of the mark touches the tissue (modified Aldehyde Fuchsin) (340×).

3.6. Numerical Density and Volume of the Beta Cells

The numerical densities of the beta cells were estimated by employing final magnification of 3400× at 12 µm thickness using the “optical dissector” technique (Figure 3). The cell count was performed as per a previously confirmed technique introduced by Noorafshan et al. (25). The mean volume of the beta cells was also assessed with point-sampled intercept method (25).

Figure 3. To calculate the beta cells' numerical density (Nv), each cell that was within the counting box or contacted the containing borders (red dashed lines) as well as did not adjoin the exclusion margins (red solid lines) and came into maximal focus within the next traveling 5 µm optical area (height of dissector) was counted (modified Aldehyde Fuchsin) (3400×).

3.7. Ethical Issues

All national and institutional regulations considering the use of laboratory animals complied. Furthermore, the design and protocol of investigation were also affirmed by the Medical Ethics Department of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran (Reg. No: 90-01-61-3948).

3.8. Statistics

The derived data were analyzed and expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical calculations were done by application of Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests to compare the rat groups as the derived data were non-parametric. All tests were done by an expert statistician using SPSS software (21.0, IBM™, USA) program. P-value ≤0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

4. Results

Volume densities and total number of islets and beta cells in E1 and E2 groups were significantly higher than C1, and lower than C2 (Table 1). Volume densities of islets and beta cells, and total number of beta cells in E1 were significantly higher than C2 group by 69%, 274%, and 188%, respectively (P < 0.05). Volume densities of islets and beta cells in E2 group significantly increased by 152% and 187% in comparison to C2 (P < 0.005). BS levels also seemed to be lower in E1 (526 mg/dL) and E2 (479 mg/dL) groups compared to the C2 (721 mg/dL).

Table 1. Evaluation of Salvia officinalis (SO) properties against Streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rodent models a
GroupsWeightPancreas VolumeIsletsBeta CellsBlood Sugar
BodyPancreasPrimaryFinalShrinkageVvTotal VolumeNvTotal Number
C1221.87 ± 9.16860.41 ± 74.22830.31 ± 45.79711.79 ± 33.714.27 ± 0.150.96 ± 0.916.81 ± 2.061933.38 ± 391.27 b1.16 ± 0.39 b138.52 ± 41.23
C2209.43 ± 11.60872.39 ± 97.24918.21 ± 82.13715.44 ± 92.8422.35 ± 0.21c0.39 ± 0.73 c2.78 ± 0.54 c127.81 ± 84.57 c0.27 ± 0.18 c721.33 ± 29.31c
E1202.37 ± 7.72857.51 ± 42.91856.91 ± 14.31613.42 ± 64.1724.98 ± 1.020.67 ± 0.07b3.91 ± 0.88b579.24 ± 29.98 b0.96 ± 0.45 b526.21 ± 79.13 b
E2200.14 ± 8.31837.33 ± 39.56838.27 ± 51.55681.03 ± 36.1620.1 ± 0.910.61 ± 0.23 b3.89 ± 0.97b484.77 ± 90.41b0.81 ± 0.31b479.45 ± 68.82 b

aBlood sugar (mg/dL), numerical density (Nv; per mm3) and total number of beta cells (×106), volume density (Vv; %) and total volume of the pancreatic islets (mm3), primary and final volume of pancreases (mm3), shrinkage ratio (%), weights of the rats (g) and their pancreases (mg), in each group: C1 as non-diabetics, C2 as not treated diabetics, E1 as diabetics with 200 mg/kg Salvia, and E2 as diabetic rats with 400 mg/kg Salvia (n = 12).

b P ≤ 0.05 vs. C2 group.

c P ≤ 0.05 vs. C1 group.

5. Discussion

The increasing prevalence of DM is a worldwide problem that may result in several irrecoverable consequences for individuals, healthcare system, and societies (26). Currently, therapeutic approaches regarding DM are mainly comprised of adjusting patients’ diet and lifestyle of patients as well as prescribing oral hypoglycemic drugs and/or Insulin (27). Current therapeutic prescriptions such as sulfonylureas, meglitinides, biguanides, thiazolidinediones, and insulin may have several adverse effects, for instance, skin infection at the injection site, risk of hypoglycemia, weight gain, fluid retention, and congestive heart failure (28, 29).

Previous studies suggested that the therapeutic administration of several herbal medicines for DM could be safe (30-32). Besides, today’s trend for the use of natural plant-derived medicines encouraged researchers to conduct investigations in this regard. Among these plants, we believe SVO should also be investigated, as it consists of polyphenols that have been found to have anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects.

Streptozotocin (STZ) has been prescribed in several ethnomedicines for its anti-diabetic properties, which could be explained by its regulating effect on oxidative stress (33, 34). Moreover, SVO contains phenolic compounds such as Rosmaranic acid that have been shown anti-oxidative properties (35). Previous studies confirmed that this plant contains Ursolic acid that could improve inflammation and oxidative stress (36, 37). In the present study, hydro-alcoholic extract of SVO was used in STZ-induced diabetic rats that confirmed the protective effects of this agent against pancreas degeneration. Prior to our study, Eidi et al. have also shown significant reduction in triglycerides, total cholesterol, uric acid, creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and serum BS, besides an increased plasma insulin level could happen after administration of SVO in STZ-induced diabetic rats (17). Similarly, Belhadj et al. mentioned that SVO oil could alleviate metabolic problems by lowering the glycemia and increasing the glycogen storages in diabetic rats (38). Consistently, it has been shown that the administration of SVO extract exhibits the same outcomes compared to rosiglitazone; as it could increase insulin sensitivity, and decrease lipogenesis in animal models (39). Our study also showed a decrease in BS of STZ-induced diabetic rats after oral administration of the extract. Furthermore, volume density of the islets and beta cells, volume density, and the total number of beta cells were higher in SVO-treated groups. Other reports were comparably in favor of this hypothesis that SVO extract could be beneficial regarding the treatment of DM and its complications (40, 41). A recent study showed that the SVO could reduce the aldose reductase activity, which plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of DM complications (42). Another in vitro investigation also demonstrated that SVO extract has inhibitory effects on α-glucosidase and α-amylase activities that may control the postprandial hyperglycemia (43). Furthermore, the clinical evidence was also in favor of administrating the agent for DM cases, as the consumption of SVO reduced insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome patients (44).

However, in contrast to the mentioned findings, a study mentioned that intraperitoneal injection of SVO extract did not show any anti-hyperglycemic effect in sub-chronic diabetic rats (45). Another report showed controversial results as intraperitoneal injection of SVO extract significantly decreased fasting BS in normal and mild-diabetic rats, but it was not found beneficial regarding the severe condition of DM in animal models (46). Our study demonstrated that SVO-treated groups had a significant delay in the degeneration of pancreas. SVO-treated groups had higher beta cells population and the islets in comparison to non-treated group.

This study had some limitations to be considered. The study was designed to stereologically analyze the effect of SVO extract on animal models; hence, we did not test the rats regarding other inflammatory factors, which ‎could have been helpful in the studies done on DM. Examiners’ inaccuracy may also result in bias regarding the stereological evaluation of pancreases. Moreover, we did not test the possibility of SVO toxication at higher dosages, which could be investigated in future examinations.

We believe as the progression of DM is markedly slower in our animal study, prescription of SVO as a therapeutic food supplement could be beneficial for high-risk patients. This could reduce the risk of pancreas degeneration and increase the beta cell functions. Considering the former findings regarding the effectiveness of SVO extract in DM, we hypothesize that this plant-derived medicine could have more preventive role than therapeutic. However, more animal and clinical investigations are needed to prove this hypothesis.

Acknowledgements

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9(th) edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843. [PubMed: 31518657].

  • 2.

    Rudge MV, Damasceno DC, Volpato GT, Almeida FC, Calderon IM, Lemonica IP. Effect of Ginkgo biloba on the reproductive outcome and oxidative stress biomarkers of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2007;40(8):1095-9. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2006005000132. [PubMed: 17665046].

  • 3.

    Mukherjee PK, Maiti K, Mukherjee K, Houghton PJ. Leads from Indian medicinal plants with hypoglycemic potentials. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;106(1):1-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2006.03.021. [PubMed: 16678368].

  • 4.

    Oh YS. Plant-derived compounds targeting pancreatic beta cells for the treatment of diabetes. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:629863. doi: 10.1155/2015/629863. [PubMed: 26587047]. [PubMed Central: PMC4637477].

  • 5.

    Hettiarachchy NS, Glenn KC, Gnanasambandam R, Johnson MG. Natural antioxidant extract from fenugreek (Trigonella foenumgraecum) for ground beef patties. J Food Sci. 1996;61(3):516-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1996.tb13146.x.

  • 6.

    Bozin B, Mimica-Dukic N, Samojlik I, Goran A, Igic R. Phenolics as antioxidants in garlic (Allium sativum L., Alliaceae). Food Chemistry. 2008;111(4):925-9. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.04.071.

  • 7.

    Srinivasan K. Plant foods in the management of diabetes mellitus: Spices as beneficial antidiabetic food adjuncts. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2005;56(6):399-414. doi: 10.1080/09637480500512872. [PubMed: 16361181].

  • 8.

    Alarcon-Aguilara FJ, Roman-Ramos R, Perez-Gutierrez S, Aguilar-Contreras A, Contreras-Weber CC, Flores-Saenz JL. Study of the anti-hyperglycemic effect of plants used as antidiabetics. J Ethnopharmacol. 1998;61(2):101-10. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(98)00020-8.

  • 9.

    Baricevic D, Sosa S, Della Loggia R, Tubaro A, Simonovska B, Krasna A, et al. Topical anti-inflammatory activity of Salvia officinalis L. leaves: The relevance of ursolic acid. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001;75(2-3):125-32. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(00)00396-2.

  • 10.

    Cherevatyıˆ V.S, Vashhenko T.N. Comparative evaluation of the antibacterial action of different extracts from Salvia officinali. Rastitel'nye Resursy. 1980;16:137-9.

  • 11.

    Zupko I, Hohmann J, Redei D, Falkay G, Janicsak G, Mathe I. Antioxidant activity of leaves of Salvia species in enzyme-dependent and enzyme-independent systems of lipid peroxidation and their phenolic constituents. Planta Med. 2001;67(4):366-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-14327. [PubMed: 11458459].

  • 12.

    Ghorbani A, Esmaeilizadeh M. Pharmacological properties of Salvia officinalis and its components. J Tradit Complement Med. 2017;7(4):433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2016.12.014. [PubMed: 29034191]. [PubMed Central: PMC5634728].

  • 13.

    Behradmanesh S, Derees F, Rafieian-Kopaei M. Effect of Salvia officinalis on diabetic patients. J Renal Inj Prev. 2013;2(2):51-4. doi: 10.12861/jrip.2013.18. [PubMed: 25340127]. [PubMed Central: PMC4206016].

  • 14.

    Hohmann J, Zupko I, Redei D, Csanyi M, Falkay G, Mathe I, et al. Protective effects of the aerial parts of Salvia officinalis, Melissa officinalis and Lavandula angustifolia and their constituents against enzyme-dependent and enzyme-independent lipid peroxidation. Planta Med. 1999;65(6):576-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-960830. [PubMed: 10532875].

  • 15.

    Walch SG, Tinzoh LN, Zimmermann BF, Stuhlinger W, Lachenmeier DW. Antioxidant capacity and polyphenolic composition as quality indicators for aqueous infusions of Salvia officinalis L. (sage tea). Front Pharmacol. 2011;2:79. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2011.00079. [PubMed: 22194722]. [PubMed Central: PMC3242359].

  • 16.

    Cuvelier ME, Berset C, Richard H. Antioxidant constituents in Sage (Salvia officinalis). J Agric Food Chem. 2002;42(3):665-9. doi: 10.1021/jf00039a012.

  • 17.

    Eidi A, Eidi M. Antidiabetic effects of sage (Salvia officinalis L.) leaves in normal and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2009;3(1):40-4. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2008.10.007.

  • 18.

    Lenzen S. The mechanisms of alloxan- and streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Diabetologia. 2008;51(2):216-26. doi: 10.1007/s00125-007-0886-7. [PubMed: 18087688].

  • 19.

    Eidi M, Eidi A, Zamanizadeh H. Effect of Salvia officinalis L. leaves on serum glucose and insulin in healthy and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;100(3):310-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.03.008. [PubMed: 16125023].

  • 20.

    Ashkani-Esfahani S, Ebrahimi A, Bahmani-Jahromi M, Nadimi E, Arabzadeh H, Jalalpour MH, et al. The effect of Melissa officinalis extract on Streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats: A Stereological study on pancreatic islets and beta-cells. J Adv Med Biomed Res. 2021;29(132):34-40. doi: 10.30699/jambs.29.132.34.

  • 21.

    Damasceno DC, Netto AO, Iessi IL, Gallego FQ, Corvino SB, Dallaqua B, et al. Streptozotocin-induced diabetes models: pathophysiological mechanisms and fetal outcomes. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:819065. doi: 10.1155/2014/819065. [PubMed: 24977161]. [PubMed Central: PMC4058231].

  • 22.

    Bangle RJ. Factors influencing the staining of beta-cell granules in pancreatic islets with various basic dyes, including paraldehyde-fuchsin. Am J Pathol. 1956;32(2):349-62. [PubMed: 13302402]. [PubMed Central: PMC1942651].

  • 23.

    Andersen K. Cavalieri's method of indivisibles. Arch Hist Exact Sci. 1985;31(4):291-367.

  • 24.

    Mattfeldt T, Mall G, Gharehbaghi H, Moller P. Estimation of surface area and length with the orientator. J Microsc. 1990;159(Pt 3):301-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1990.tb03036.x. [PubMed: 2243364].

  • 25.

    Noorafshan A, Hoseini L, Karbalay-Doust S, Nadimi E. A simple stereological method for estimating the number and the volume of the pancreatic beta cells. J Pancreas. 2012;13(4):427-32.

  • 26.

    King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. Global burden of diabetes, 1995-2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(9):1414-31. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.9.1414. [PubMed: 9727886].

  • 27.

    Vats V, Grover JK, Rathi SS. Evaluation of anti-hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic effect of Trigonella foenum-graecum Linn, Ocimum sanctum Linn and Pterocarpus marsupium Linn in normal and alloxanized diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002;79(1):95-100. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(01)00374-9. [PubMed: 11744301].

  • 28.

    Lago RM, Singh PP, Nesto RW. Congestive heart failure and cardiovascular death in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes given thiazolidinediones: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Lancet. 2007;370(9593):1129-36. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61514-1. [PubMed: 17905165].

  • 29.

    Mudaliar S, Chang AR, Henry RR. Thiazolidinediones, peripheral edema, and type 2 diabetes: Incidence, pathophysiology, and clinical implications. Endocr Pract. 2003;9(5):406-16. doi: 10.4158/EP.9.5.406. [PubMed: 14583425].

  • 30.

    Yeh GY, Eisenberg DM, Kaptchuk TJ, Phillips RS. Systematic review of herbs and dietary supplements for glycemic control in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(4):1277-94. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.4.1277. [PubMed: 12663610].

  • 31.

    Skalli S, Hassikou R, Arahou M. An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used for diabetes treatment in Rabat, Morocco. Heliyon. 2019;5(3). e01421. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01421. [PubMed: 30976694]. [PubMed Central: PMC6441794].

  • 32.

    Mrabti HN, Jaradat N, Kachmar MR, Ed-Dra A, Ouahbi A, Cherrah Y, et al. Integrative herbal treatments of diabetes in Beni Mellal region of Morocco. J Integr Med. 2019;17(2):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2019.01.001. [PubMed: 30670366].

  • 33.

    Kintzios S, Baricevic D, Bartol T. The biological/pharmacological activity of the Salvia genus. In Sage- the Genus Salvia. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers; 2000.

  • 34.

    Pereira OR, Catarino MD, Afonso AF, Silva AMS, Cardoso SM. Salvia elegans, Salvia greggii and Salvia officinalis decoctions: Antioxidant activities and inhibition of carbohydrate and lipid metabolic enzymes. Molecules. 2018;23(12). doi: 10.3390/molecules23123169. [PubMed: 30513773]. [PubMed Central: PMC6321363].

  • 35.

    Ramos AA, Pedro D, Collins AR, Pereira-Wilson C. Protection by Salvia extracts against oxidative and alkylation damage to DNA in human HCT15 and CO115 cells. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2012;75(13-15):765-75. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2012.689804. [PubMed: 22788364].

  • 36.

    Baricevic D, Sosa S, Della Loggia R, Tubaro A, Simonovska B, Krasna A, et al. Topical anti-inflammatory activity of Salvia officinalis L. leaves: the relevance of ursolic acid. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001;75(2-3):125-32. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(00)00396-2. [PubMed: 11297842].

  • 37.

    Lima CF, Andrade PB, Seabra RM, Fernandes-Ferreira M, Pereira-Wilson C. The drinking of a Salvia officinalis infusion improves liver antioxidant status in mice and rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;97(2):383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.11.029. [PubMed: 15707779].

  • 38.

    Belhadj S, Hentati O, Hammami M, Ben Hadj A, Boudawara T, Dammak M, et al. Metabolic impairments and tissue disorders in alloxan-induced diabetic rats are alleviated by Salvia officinalis L. essential oil. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;108:985-95. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.09.108. [PubMed: 30372910].

  • 39.

    Ben Khedher MR, Hammami M, Arch JRS, Hislop DC, Eze D, Wargent ET, et al. Preventive effects of Salvia officinalis leaf extract on insulin resistance and inflammation in a model of high fat diet-induced obesity in mice that responds to rosiglitazone. PeerJ. 2018;6. e4166. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4166. [PubMed: 29333341]. [PubMed Central: PMC5765810].

  • 40.

    Durling N, Catchpole O, Grey J, Webby R, Mitchell K, Foo L, et al. Extraction of phenolics and essential oil from dried sage (Salvia officinalis) using ethanol–water mixtures. Food Chemistry. 2007;101(4):1417-24. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.03.050.

  • 41.

    Hosseinzadeh H, Ramezani M, Danaei AR. Antihyperglycaemic effect and acute toxicity of Securigera Securidaca L. seed extracts in mice. Phytother Res. 2002;16(8):745-7. doi: 10.1002/ptr.1020. [PubMed: 12458478].

  • 42.

    Amraee S, Bahramikia S. Inhibitory effect of effective fraction of Salvia officinalis on aldose reductase activity: Strategy to reduce complications of type 2 diabetes. Orient Pharm Exp Med. 2018;19(2):211-6. doi: 10.1007/s13596-018-0354-6.

  • 43.

    Mahdi S, Azzi R, Lahfa FB. Evaluation of in vitro alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase inhibitory potential and hemolytic effect of phenolic enriched fractions of the aerial part of Salvia officinalis L. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(4):689-94. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.002. [PubMed: 32442919].

  • 44.

    Amini L, Mojab F, Jahanfar S, Sepidarkish M, Raoofi Z, Maleki-Hajiagha A. Efficacy of Salvia officinalis extract on the prevention of insulin resistance in euglycemic patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: A double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial. Complement Ther Med. 2020;48:102245. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.102245. [PubMed: 31987228].

  • 45.

    Hajzadeh MAR, Rajaei Z, Ghamami G, Tamiz A. [The effect of Salvia officinalis leaf extract on blood glucose in streptozocin-dIiabetic rats]. Pharmacologyonline. 2011;1:213-20. Persian.

  • 46.

    Alarcon-Aguilar FJ, Roman-Ramos R, Flores-Saenz JL, Aguirre-Garcia F. Investigation on the hypoglycaemic effects of extracts of four Mexican medicinal plants in normal and alloxan-diabetic mice. Phytother Res. 2002;16(4):383-6. doi: 10.1002/ptr.914. [PubMed: 12112298].

  • Copyright © 2022, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
    COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: