Outcomes of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Its Predictors in Hospitalized Patients

AUTHORS

Meisam Moezzi 1 , Golshan Afshari 2 , * , Fakher Rahim 3 , Meysam Alavian 2 , Maryam Banitorfi 2 , Saeed Hesam 4 , Nasrin Fatemi 2

1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Golestan Hospital Clinical Research Development Unit, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

3 Research Center of Thalassemia & Hemoglobinopathy, Health Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

4 Department of Biostatistics, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

How to Cite: Moezzi M , Afshari G, Rahim F, Alavian M , Banitorfi M , et al. Outcomes of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Its Predictors in Hospitalized Patients, Multidiscip Cardio Annal. Online ahead of Print ; In Press(In Press):e104654. doi: 10.5812/mca.104654.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Annals: In Press (In Press); e104654
Published Online: June 16, 2020
Article Type: Research Article
Received: May 6, 2020
Revised: May 28, 2020
Accepted: May 29, 2020
Uncorrected Proof scheduled for 11 (2)
Crossmark
Crossmark
CHECKING
READ FULL TEXT

Abstract

Background: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been a frequently performed medical intervention that increases the chance of survival of a person stricken by cardiac arrest, and there is an excellent value of diversity in the rate of successful rehabilitation in societies.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was carried out. The medical records of all in-hospital and out-hospital cardiac arrest patients who underwent CPR were collected. A total of 587 people with who underwent CPR during two years between January 2017 and June 2018, using a designed form were enrolled. Demographic information, the ward which CPR was committed, hospitalization, the delay before the onset of CPR and time of the day were recorded.

Results: The overall success rate of CPR in this study was 25.89%. There was no significant difference in the success rate of CPR between men and women. A comparison of age groups revealed a difference between the success rates of CPR in 14 - 64 years group compared with the group above 64. Analysis of the data revealed no difference between CPR success rates in various seasons. Investigating the occurrence of cardiac arrest and its success rate at the hospital shifting showed a significant difference between the success rate of CPR in the morning shift with the evening shift and night. The dual comparison revealed a significant difference in the success rate of CPR only between the emergency department and intensive care units.

Conclusions: The current study revealed a significant difference in age group and location, and did not show any significant success rate of CPR in the presence of witnesses, location of cardiac arrest, season and gender.

Copyright © 2020, Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Annals. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Background

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been a frequently performed medical intervention that increases the chance of survival of a person suffering from cardiac arrest or heart failure. A group of researchers revealed a survival rate of 6% to 43% in cancer and monitored bed patients (1, 2). CPR involves actions taken to restore the function of the two vital organs of the body, heart, and brain in a person who has cessation of forwarding blood flow from the heart or lack of spontaneous circulation. Several factors were claimed to be responsible for such variation, including various selection criteria, different settings, and problems with definitions of common variables (3). Cardiac arrest may be due to an underlying medical condition such as heart disease, pulmonary dysfunction, poisoning, cancers, a variety of strokes, electrocution, drowning or frostbite (4).

According to the American Heart Association, nearly 95% of the sudden cardiac death cases, die before they reach the hospital and if after cardiac arrest, CPR did not provide, for every one minute delay in starting the CPR, 7 - 10 percent increases in the risk of death (5). Today, cardiopulmonary resuscitation can be done in two components of CPR including basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) (6). With the above explanations, one of the greatest challenges in performing CPR is the time to start, so that even a minute delay at resuscitation reduces the likelihood of success. The importance of time is such that, when CPR begins with a delay of 10 minutes, brain death will occur despite the success of heart resuscitation (7). Any major issue in prognosis and outcomes in cardiac arrest is the location of the patient at the time of CPR, time of starting CPR, underlying disease, initial electrocardiogram (EKG) rhythm, proper defibrillation and most importantly the quality of CPR (8).

Though performing CPR has made substantial progress in recent years, there are limited data on the outcomes of CPR from low and middle-income countries (8-11). Thus, various settings and resources in low and middle-income countries have the potential to affect the eventual outcome of CPR (12).

2. Objectives

This study aims to determine the possible success rate of CPR in patients who had a cardiac arrest at a referral hospital in Southwestern Iran, as well as providing a conceptual framework based on CPR outcomes.

3. Methods

Study design and population: This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of all in-hospital and out-hospital cardiac arrest patients who underwent CPR during two years between January 2017 and June 2018, using forms designed by the Ministry of Health for recording CPR data (checklist 1). The Ethical Committee of National Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences approved this study of. Successful CPR defined by patients that have a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after CPR, subjects alive for more than 24 hours, and those who had survived to discharge (13).

3.1. Setting

This trauma and cardiovascular center hospital was a 660-bed facility with an Emergency Department (ED) comprising of 50 monitored beds and two resuscitation beds. During the study period, more than 80,000 patients underwent either emergency department visits or were admitted to the hospital, of which 578 patients either present with cardiac arrest or go into arrest during a hospital stay.

3.2. Inclusion Criteria

Young adult, middle age and old patients (age >10 years) who had sustained either an in- or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and were brought to the ED for treatment, or those who underwent CPR between January 2017 and June 2018 anywhere in the hospital.

3.3. Exclusion Criteria

Patients who were reported dead on hospital arrival, those with an advanced directive of no CPR (NCPR), or those with missing records or incomplete data were excluded.

3.4. Data Collection

The information including demographic information, the ward which CPR was performed, hospitalization, the delay before the onset of CPR, time of the day, were obtained. According to the American Heart Association, successful resuscitation or ROSC is defined for all rhythms as the restoration of an impressive spontaneous rhythm that results in more than an occasional gasp, short palpated pulse, or arterial wave form. Indeed when CPR causes the patient's heart rate to return spontaneously, it is called a successful CPR.

3.5. Statistical Analysis

To compare the difference of the seasons, we compared the number of patients and the success rates of CPR in different seasons of the year. The mean and standard deviations were used to describe qualitative variables from frequency and percentage. For data analysis, simple logistic regression was used. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp), and P < 0.05 was considered significant.

4. Results

The first set of analyses examined the number of people who were receiving CPR based on gender. Overall, 587 CPR operations were carried out on 361 men (61%), 231 women (39%), of which 152 (25.89%) were successful and 435 other operations (74.1%) were unsuccessful. There was no significant difference (P = 0.271) in the success rate of CPR between men and women (Table 1, Figure 1). The mean age of patients who underwent CPR was 59 ± 22 years, of which 31 cases (5.5%) were 10 to 14 (young adult classification), and 264 (46.6%) were over the age of 14 to 64 (middle age classification), and 271 (47.9%) were above 64 years old (old classification). There was a significant difference between CPR in three age groups 10 to 14 years old, 14 to 64, and older than 64 (P = 0.006). The comparison of age groups revealed a significant difference only between the success rate of CPR in the age group of 14 - 64 with the group above 64 (P = 0.002).

Table 1. Population and Event Characteristics
CharacteristicCPR (% Within CPR)
Successful, No. (%)Unsuccessful, No. (%)Total, No. (%)P Value
Gender
Male87 (57.2)271 (62.3)358 (61)0.271
Female65 (42.8)164 (37.7)229 (39)
Total 152 435587
Age
10 - 147 (4.8)24 (5.7)31 (5.5)0.002
14 - 6485 (57.8)179 (42.7)264 (46.6)
≥ 6455 (37.4)216 (51.6)271 (47.9)
Season
Spring46 (30.3)140 (32.2)186 (31.7)0.495
Summer25 (16.4)51 (11.7)76 (12.9)
Autumn21 (13.8)69 (15.9)90 (15.3)
Winter60 (39.5)175 (40.2)235 (40)
Total 152435587
Location
Inside the hospital137 (92.6)409 (94.2)546 (93.8)0.466
Out of hospital11 (7.4)25 (5.8)36 (6.2)
Total 148434582
Shift
Morning51 (33.6)100 (23)151 (25.7)0.037
Afternoon32 (21.1)108 (24.8)140 (23.9)
Night69 (45.4)227 (52.2)296 (50.4)
Total 152435587
Ward
Emergency ward57 (38.5)212 (49)269 (46.3)0.041
General ward71 (48)185 (42.7)256 (44.1)
Intensive care unit36 (8.3)20 (13.5)56 (9.6)
Total148433581
Witness
Present36 (87.8)115 (85.8)151 (86.3)0.9
Not present5 (12.2)19 (14.2)24 (13.7)
Total41134175
Utstein-style flow chart of patient and outcomes
Figure 1. Utstein-style flow chart of patient and outcomes

The results indicated 186 (31.7%) CPR were performed in the spring with 30.3% success rate, in the summer in 76 (12.8%) cases with a 16.4% success rate, in the autumn in 90 (15.2%) case with 13.8% success rate and finally in the winter in 235 (40%) cases with a 39.5% success rate. According to the results, most of the patients were in winter, and the highest percentage of success was in the same season; however, data analysis revealed no significant difference between CPR success rate in various seasons. Since the climatic conditions of the study area are tropical and there are practically no distinct four seasons, another analysis was performed comparing the first six months of the year (hot months) with the second six months of the year (colder months). The second analysis shows no significant differences.

Following this, the results of the site of CPR showed that 94.2% of cardiac arrests happened in the hospital, albeit there were no significant differences between CPR success rates between outside and inside the hospital (Table 1). Investigating the occurrence of cardiac arrest and its success rate at hospital shifts showed a significant difference in the CPR success rate in three different shifts (P = 0.037). Using the LSD follow-up test, we compared shifts, which showed a significant difference between the success rate of CPR in the morning shift with the evening shift (P = 0.034) and night (P = 0.017). Also, there was no significant difference between the success rates of CPR operation in the evening shift with night shifts.

Investigating the CPR in different sites of the hospital revealed that of the 581 operations carried out, 269 operations (46.3%) were carried out in the emergency department, 256 other operations (44%) in the general wards and 56 cases (9%) in intensive care units, and in six cases, the site that the CPR was taking place was not reported. The analysis results showed a significant difference in the rate of CPR success rate on different sites (P = 0.041). The dual comparison revealed a significant difference in the success rate of CPR only between the emergency department and intensive care units (P = 0.023).

The presence of a witness (therapist) at the moment of the cardiac arrest showed that of 175 cases, the witness in the 152 cases was at the patient's bedside, and about 24 cases, there were no witnesses. Data analysis revealed that was no significant difference between the success rates of CPR operation in the presence of the witness and the absence of the witness (P = 0.09).

It is necessary to mention that several recording forms of recovery have not been filled, and we have lost some data. In the age variable, 20 forms, in the witness 412 forms, in ward six and the location 5 forms were incomplete.

In summary, these results show that in the current study, the difference in age, wards, and shift were significant.

5. Discussion

The present study was designed to determine the effect of different practical factors on the CPR success rate, which showed that resuscitation was not significantly different between men and women. The results of this study are compatible with the findings of previous work in Iran, China, and America, which reported that the CPR success rate is not affected by the gender of the patients (10, 14-16). Another important finding was that the success rate of CPR in the age group of 14 - 64 was higher than that of the group above 64 years. This finding confirms the association between aging and the success rate of CPR, reported in previous studies (17, 18). In contrast, another study on the association between the age and survival after cardiac arrest at the outside of the hospital reported that although age is related to the survival of people after cardiac arrest, however, age alone does not predict the outcome of CPR and is, in fact, a poor indicator of survival (19).

Interestingly, a group of researchers examined the relationship between high and low air temperatures and outside hospital cardiac arrest with a heart attack cause. The results of the study indicated that the occurrence of cardiac arrest outside the hospital is associated with low air temperature. Also, cardiac arrest in people aged 80 years or older was associated with high air temperatures (20). Contrary to expectations, this study did not find a significant difference between CPR success rates at distinct seasons.

The prevalence of outside the hospital cardiac arrest is more than 300,000 people in the United States per year and is the third leading cause of death, and an evaluated 290,000 in-hospital cardiac arrests happen each year in the United States (21, 22). Moreover, the in-hospital mortality rate after cardiac arrest was reported at the level of 81.6% in Great Britain (23), 77.7% in the United States (24), 74% in Poland, 59% in Italy (25) and 70% in Sweden. In the present study, in-hospital and out-hospital mortality rates after cardiac arrest were %74.9 and 69.4%, respectively. Further, it can be said that we have similar results with the articles mentioned above.

Although the shortage of human resources and fatigue of therapists in the night shift affects the delivery of optimal services and have been addressed previously, no data was found on the association between working shift and the success of CPR and the quality of services (26, 27). Contrary to expectations, the current study finds a significant difference between CPR success rate and work shifts although, some studies have reported a relationship between long working hours and reverse outcomes in health care (28, 29).

As shown in Figure 2, the peak of cardiac arrest occurred at 3 a.m. and 4 p.m. Several studies on the circadian clock revealed a link between the pathogenesis of heart disease in response to adverse stress, such as ischemia/reperfusion and cardiomyocytes circadian clock (30, 31).

Prevalence of arrest by the hour of occurrence
Figure 2. Prevalence of arrest by the hour of occurrence

Further statistical tests revealed that there is a significant difference in the success rate of CPR only between the emergency department and intensive care units in the current experiment. Although it was not possible to investigate the significant relationships of different wards on the success rate of CPR, several issues were identified that the percentage of survival after CPR in ICUs is higher than in emergencies (32). However, various studies have acknowledged that advanced life support is provided by the cardiac arrest team, and the appropriate and correct use of a defibrillator is an essential factor in patients’ survival (33, 34).

However, there have been no sufficient controlled studies that compare differences in the effects of the presence or absence of witnesses at the moment of cardiac arrest. The results of this study did not show any significant increase in CPR success rate in the presence of witnesses. It is explained by the fact that there is not a complete record of the presence or absence of witnesses at the moment of cardiac arrest in the majority of CPR forms and need to be further explored in the future. Although information about the effects of the presence of a witness in the moment of cardiac arrest is limited, a study in 2013 reported that in-hospital cardiac arrest had a higher chance of survival after discharge in the presence of the witness, comparable ones with monitoring and revealed that monitored cases had a lower rate of survival to hospital discharge (35).

5.1. Limitations

The time interval for CPR announcement to start operations in all registries reported as zero. Of course, this claim is a matter of debate, and we report it as a limitation of the current study.

5.2. Conclusions

The current study is the first epidemiological study of cardiac arrest at this center. The results of this study did not show any significant increase in the success rate of CPR in the presence of witnesses, location of cardiac arrest, season, and gender. Despite the differences in cases and diagnosis of the disease and the reason for hospitalization, the main factors contributing to the success rate of CPR were age, work shift, and hospital wards. However, we need to explain the probable background diseases, past medical history, and, most importantly, the quality of CPR factors that influence CPR success in future reviews.

Acknowledgements

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Reisfield GM, Wallace SK, Munsell MF, Webb FJ, Alvarez ER, Wilson GR. Survival in cancer patients undergoing in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2006;71(2):152-60. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.02.022. [PubMed: 16987581].

  • 2.

    Herlitz J, Bang A, Aune S, Ekstrom L, Lundstrom G, Holmberg S. Characteristics and outcome among patients suffering in-hospital cardiac arrest in monitored and non-monitored areas. Resuscitation. 2001;48(2):125-35. [PubMed: 11426474].

  • 3.

    Perkins GD, Jacobs IG, Nadkarni VM, Berg RA, Bhanji F, Biarent D, et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update of the Utstein Resuscitation Registry Templates for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: a statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa, Resuscitation Council of Asia); and the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation. Circulation. 2015;132(13):1286-300. doi: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000144. [PubMed: 25391522].

  • 4.

    Kuch M, Janiszewski M, Mamcarz A, Cudnoch-Jedrzejewska A, Dluzniewski M. Major adverse cardiac event predictors in survivors of myocardial infarction with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction or chronic heart failure. Med Sci Monit. 2009;15(6):Ph40-8. [PubMed: 19478711].

  • 5.

    American Heart Association. CPR Facts and Statistics. 2019, [cited 3/12/2019]. Available from: https://www.zoll.com/-/media/uploadedfiles/public_site/core_technologies/real_cpr_help/cpr-fakten-pdf.

  • 6.

    Kurz MC, Schmicker RH, Leroux B, Nichol G, Aufderheide TP, Cheskes S, et al. Advanced vs. Basic Life Support in the Treatment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Arrest in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. Resuscitation. 2018;128:132-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.04.031. [PubMed: 29723609].

  • 7.

    Song F, Sun S, Ristagno G, Yu T, Shan Y, Chung SP, et al. Delayed high-quality CPR does not improve outcomes. Resuscitation. 2011;82 Suppl 2:S52-5. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(11)70152-6. [PubMed: 22208179].

  • 8.

    Pembeci K, Yildirim A, Turan E, Buget M, Camci E, Senturk M, et al. Assessment of the success of cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempts performed in a Turkish university hospital. Resuscitation. 2006;68(2):221-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.07.003. [PubMed: 16439311].

  • 9.

    Hajbaghery MA, Mousavi G, Akbari H. Factors influencing survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2005;66(3):317-21. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.04.004. [PubMed: 16081201].

  • 10.

    Hajzargarbashi E, Omidi E, Esmailian M. Correlation of Patients' Baseline Characteristics with Success Rate of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; a Cross-Sectional Study. Adv J Emerg Med. 2019;3(1). e6. doi: 10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.115. [PubMed: 31172117]. [PubMed Central: PMC6548081].

  • 11.

    Suraseranivongse S, Chawaruechai T, Saengsung P, Komoltri C. Outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a 2300-bed hospital in a developing country. Resuscitation. 2006;71(2):188-93. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.04.004. [PubMed: 16987585].

  • 12.

    Moosajee US, Saleem SG, Iftikhar S, Samad L. Outcomes following cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an emergency department of a low- and middle-income country. International Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2018;11(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12245-018-0200-0.

  • 13.

    APPENDIX 1 - Color Key to ACC/AHA Management Guidelines: Estimate of Certainty (Precision) of Treatment Effect.in : Jeremias A, Brown DL, editors. Cardiac Intensive Care (Second Edition). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2010. p. 673-4. doi: 10.1016/B978-1-4160-3773-6.10058-8.

  • 14.

    Stotts MJ, Hung KW, Benson A, Biggins SW. Rate and predictors of successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation in end-stage liver disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59(8):1983-6. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3084-8. [PubMed: 24599771].

  • 15.

    Zhang C, Wang Y, Liu H, Hao A, Xun J, Meng Q. [Comparative study for effects of bare-handed CPR with Thumper cardiopulmonary resuscitator CPR in emergency department based on "the Utstein style"]. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017;29(10):937-9. Chinese. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.10.015. [PubMed: 29017657].

  • 16.

    Dicker B, Conaglen K, Howie G. Gender and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a New Zealand registry study. Emerg Med J. 2018;35(6):367-71. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207176. [PubMed: 29661780].

  • 17.

    Winther-Jensen M, Kjaergaard J, Hassager C, Bro-Jeppesen J, Nielsen N, Lippert FK, et al. Resuscitation and post resuscitation care of the very old after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is worthwhile. Int J Cardiol. 2015;201:616-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.08.143. [PubMed: 26340128].

  • 18.

    Snyder JE, Loschner AL, Kepley HO. The effect of patient age on perceived resuscitation outcomes by practitioners. N C Med J. 2010;71(3):199-205. [PubMed: 20681485].

  • 19.

    Andersen LW, Bivens MJ, Giberson T, Giberson B, Mottley JL, Gautam S, et al. The relationship between age and outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Resuscitation. 2015;94:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.05.015. [PubMed: 26044753].

  • 20.

    Yamazaki S, Michikawa T. Association between high and low ambient temperature and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with cardiac etiology in Japan: a case-crossover study. Environ Health Prev Med. 2017;22(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12199-017-0669-9. [PubMed: 29165155]. [PubMed Central: PMC5664445].

  • 21.

    Milan M, Perman SM. Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Current Review of the Literature that Informed the 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update. Current emergency and hospital medicine reports. 2016;4(4):164-71. doi: 10.1007/s40138-016-0118-x. [PubMed: 30271683].

  • 22.

    Andersen LW, Holmberg MJ, Berg KM, Donnino MW, Granfeldt A. In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Review. Jama. 2019;321(12):1200-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1696. [PubMed: 30912843]. [PubMed Central: PMC6482460].

  • 23.

    Nolan JP, Soar J, Smith GB, Gwinnutt C, Parrott F, Power S, et al. Incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom National Cardiac Arrest Audit. Resuscitation. 2014;85(8):987-92. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.04.002. [PubMed: 24746785].

  • 24.

    Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Adams RJ, Berry JD, Brown TM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(4):e18-e209. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182009701. [PubMed: 21160056]. [PubMed Central: PMC4418670].

  • 25.

    Radeschi G, Mina A, Berta G, Fassiola A, Roasio A, Urso F, et al. Incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in Italy: a multicentre observational study in the Piedmont Region. Resuscitation. 2017;119:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.06.020. [PubMed: 28655621].

  • 26.

    Zafari AM, Zarter SK, Heggen V, Wilson P, Taylor RA, Reddy K, et al. A program encouraging early defibrillation results in improved in-hospital resuscitation efficacy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(4):846-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.054. [PubMed: 15312869].

  • 27.

    Citolino CM, Santos ES, Silva Rde C, Nogueira Lde S. [Factors affecting the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in inpatient units: perception of nurses]. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015;49(6):908-14. doi: 10.1590/s0080-623420150000600005. [PubMed: 27419673].

  • 28.

    Dembe AE, Delbos R, Erickson JB. Estimates of injury risks for healthcare personnel working night shifts and long hours. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(5):336-40. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029512. [PubMed: 19812094].

  • 29.

    Bae SH, Fabry D. Assessing the relationships between nurse work hours/overtime and nurse and patient outcomes: systematic literature review. Nurs Outlook. 2014;62(2):138-56. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2013.10.009. [PubMed: 24345613].

  • 30.

    Durgan DJ, Young ME. The cardiomyocyte circadian clock: emerging roles in health and disease. Circulation research. 2010;106(4):647-58. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.209957. [PubMed: 20203314].

  • 31.

    Jeyaraj D, Haldar SM, Wan X, McCauley MD, Ripperger JA, Hu K, et al. Circadian rhythms govern cardiac repolarization and arrhythmogenesis. Nature. 2012;483(7387):96-9. doi: 10.1038/nature10852. [PubMed: 22367544].

  • 32.

    Vafaei A, Shams Akhtari A, Heidari K, Hosseini S. Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Emergency Department Based on the AHA 2015 Guidelines; a Brief Report. Emerg (Tehran). 2018;6(1). e46. [PubMed: 30584562]. [PubMed Central: PMC6289144].

  • 33.

    Sandroni C, Ferro G, Santangelo S, Tortora F, Mistura L, Cavallaro F, et al. In-hospital cardiac arrest: survival depends mainly on the effectiveness of the emergency response. Resuscitation. 2004;62(3):291-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.03.020. [PubMed: 15325448].

  • 34.

    Assar S, Husseinzadeh M, Nikravesh AH, Davoodzadeh H. The Success Rate of Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Ahvaz Training Hospitals. Scientifica. 2016;2016:8. doi: 10.1155/2016/9648140.

  • 35.

    Chon GR, Lee J, Shin Y, Huh JW, Lim CM, Koh Y, et al. Clinical outcomes of witnessed and monitored cases of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the general ward of a university hospital in Korea. Respir Care. 2013;58(11):1937-44. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02448. [PubMed: 23611868].

  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: