Role of Osteoprotegerin as Novel Marker in Urinary Stone Formers: A Pilot Study

AUTHORS

Sreedhar Dayapule 1 , SaiSwaroop Parthasarathy Yamajala 1 , * , Ankit Anand 1 , Ritvij Patankar 1 , Bala Murali Krishna 1 , Nageswara Rao Chadalawada 1

1 Department of Urology & Renal Transplantation, Dr. PSIMS & RF, NTRUHS University, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India

How to Cite: Dayapule S, Yamajala S P, Anand A, Patankar R, Krishna B M, et al. Role of Osteoprotegerin as Novel Marker in Urinary Stone Formers: A Pilot Study, Nephro-Urol Mon. Online ahead of Print ; In Press(In Press):e112974. doi: 10.5812/numonthly.112974.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Nephro-Urology Monthly: In Press (In Press); e112974
Published Online: April 25, 2021
Article Type: Research Article
Received: January 16, 2021
Accepted: March 2, 2021
Uncorrected Proof scheduled for 13 (2)
Crossmark
Crossmark
CHECKING
READ FULL TEXT

Abstract

Background: Urinary tract calculus formation can be prevented by identifying molecules and metabolic disturbances that affect this process. Osteoprotegerin (OPG), a cytokine of the TNF receptor superfamily, has been demonstrated to mediate vascular calcification and intimal calcification. Endothelial injury and oxidative stress are known to play a role in urolithiasis in the form of Rendall’s plaques.

Objectives: The present study aimed to compare 24-h urinary and serum OPG levels of patients with and without urolithiasis.

Methods: In this case-control study, 24-h urinary levels of OPG (pg/mL), serum levels of OPG (pg/mL), and creatinine (mg/dL) were measured in both groups. Urinary and serum levels of OPG were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using human OPG kits.

Results: Mean serum creatinine was 0.86 ± 0.21 mg/dL in the case group and 0.77± 0.16 mg/dL in controls. The difference in the mean serum OPG levels between the cases (227.13 ± 98.02 pg/mL) and controls (47.28 ± 29.61 pg/mL) was highly significant (P value < 0.0001). The difference in the mean 24-h urinary OPG levels between the cases (156.12 ± 174.31 pg/mL) and controls (9.32 ± 23.72 pg/mL) was highly significant (P value < 0.001).

Conclusions: There were significantly higher levels of OPG in serum and 24-h urine samples of cases than in controls. Hence, it requires further large studies to make OPG a diagnostic and prognostic marker.

1.Background

Urinary stones affect 10 - 12% of the population, with 5 - 10% of the average lifetime risk of stone formation. A multistep process occurs in the formation of urinary tract calculus. The detection of molecules and metabolic disorders that influence this phase offers the ability to intervene in the prevention of stone formation. However, the pattern and incidence of the disease have changed markedly in the last few decades. With a recurrence rate of nearly 50%, it has an essential effect on the health care system (1). Various factors are known to influence urolithiasis. It is clinically significant to look out for factors that can predict the possibility of stone formation in the future, as the stone disease continues to impose an economic burden in developing countries.

Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a cytokine from the superfamily of TNF receptors. Due to its protective bone effects (Latin: "os" bone and "protegere" to protect), it was named OPG. As known, OPG is also an inhibitory factor of osteoclastogenesis (OCIF) (2). This molecule is known as a pro-inflammatory cytokine. It is shown that vascular calcification and intimal calcification may be mediated by OPG, associated with atherosclerotic plaque formation. Endothelial injury and oxidative stress are known to play a role in urolithiasis in the form of Rendall's plaques (3). The relationship between of OPG and urolithiasis has not been studied extensively.

2. Objectives

The present study compared 24-h urinary and serum OPG levels of patients with urolithiasis (case group) and without urolithiasis (control group).

3. Methods

3.1. Study Design

This case-control study was performed on patients visiting the Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation at Dr. PSIMS and RF in 2019-20.

3.2. Study Population

The inclusion criteria for the cases (group A) were a diagnosis of urinary tract stones by plain spiral computed tomography (CT) scan. Patients with urinary tract infection, urinary tract obstruction, genitourinary tract anomalies, critical illness, pregnancy, chronic renal failure needing dialysis, and malignancy were excluded from the study. The controls (group B) were selected from among patients who visited other departments without any complaints of stone disease, with no history of renal or ureteral stones and no evidence of stones on imaging.

3.3. Sample Size

A total of 22 patients with documented urolithiasis were considered as cases (group A), and 22 patients with no evidence of documented urolithiasis were taken as controls (group B).

3.4. Studied Variables

We measured 24-h urinary levels of OPG (pg/mL), serum levels of OPG (pg/mL), and creatinine (mg/dL), along with the sex and age of subjects in both groups. Urinary and serum levels of OPG were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using human OPG kits (RayBiotech Inc.) for both groups. Stone analysis of calculi was done using fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.

3.5. Ethical Clearance

This study was accepted by the institution's ethics committee. All subjects were informed of the study’s purposes, and a consent form was obtained from them to be included in the study.

4. Results

The mean age of the cases was 51.05 ± 14.77 years, while that of the controls was 42.27 ± 16.01 years. Both groups were gender-matched, with no significant difference between them. Mean serum creatinine was 0.86 ± 0.21 mg/dL in the case group and 0.77 ± 0.16 mg/dL among the controls. The difference in the mean serum OPG levels between the cases (227.13 ± 98.02 pg/mL) and controls (47.28 ± 29.61 pg/mL) was highly significant (P-value < 0.0001). The mean 24-h urinary OPG levels were 156.12 ± 174.31 pg/mL among the cases, and 9.32 ± 23.72 pg/mL in the control group, and this difference was also highly significant (P-value < 0.001) (Table 1).

Table 1. Description of Gender, Age, Serum Creatinine, Serum, and 24-h Urinary Osteoprotegerin Levels Among Controls and Case Groups a
Control Group (n = 22)Study Group (n = 22)TotalP Value
Gender> 0.05
Male15 (68.18)13 (59.09)28 (63.64)
Female7 (31.82)9 (40.91)16 (36.36)
Age (y)> 0.05
16 - 307 (31.82)3 (13.64)10 (22.73)
31 - 454 (18.18)7 (31.82)11 (25.00)
46 - 609 (40.91)4 (18.18)13 (29.55)
61 - 752 (9.09)8 (36.36)10 (22.73)
Serum creatinine (mg/dL)> 0.05
≤ 0.75 (19.54)4 (17.79)9 (19.09)
> 0.717 (80.46)18 (82.21)35 (81.91)
Serum osteoprotegerin (pg/mL)< 0.0001
≤ 6014 (63.64)1 (4.55)15 (34.09)
> 608 (36.36)21 (95.45)29 (65.91)
24-h urinary osteoprotegerin (pg/mL)< 0.001
0 - 20022 (100.00)14 (63.64)36 (81.82)
200 - 4000 (0.00)5 (22.73)5 (11.36)
400 - 6000 (0.00)3 (13.64)3 (6.82)

aValues are expressed as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated.

Interestingly, 17/22 (77.27%) of the controls had zero osteoprotegerin levels in 24-h urine samples. A consistent finding suggested that 5/22 of positive samples may be attributed to sampling error, as the values only ranged between 10 and 90 pg/mL. The difference in the mean OPG levels between radio-opaque stones (234.63 ± 101.14 pg/mL) and radio-lucent stones (207.16 ± 94.93 pg/mL) was not statistically significant (Table 2).

Table 2. Serum and 24-h Urinary Osteoprotegerin Levels Across Various Types of Calculi a
Type of Stone Wise Study GroupTotal (n = 22)P Value
Radio Lucent (n = 6)Radio Opaque (n = 16)
Serum osteoprotegerin (pg/mL)> 0.05
50 - 1502 (33.33)4 (25.00)6 (27.27)
150 - 2502 (33.33)6 (37.50)8 (36.36)
250 - 3502 (33.33)4 (25.00)6 (27.27)
350 - 4500 (0.00)2 (12.50)2 (9.09)
24-h urinary osteoprotegerin (pg/mL)> 0.05
0 - 2005 (83.33)9 (56.25)14 (63.64)
200 - 4001 (16.67)4 (25.00)5 (22.73)
400 - 6000 (0.00)3 (18.75)3 (13.64)

aValues are expressed as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated.

Stone analysis was done for each calculus that we included in our study. It was revealed that the maximum stones were related to calcium oxalate at 45.45%. This was followed by mixed calcium oxalate + uric acid at 27.27%. Pure uric acid stones formed 9.09% of the stone burden, while mixed uric acid + brushite stones formed 9.06% of the bulk. The least common type of calculi belonged to calcium oxalate + ammonium urate stones and pure brushite stones at 4.55% each. Calcium oxalate as part of pure oxalate stones and mixed stones formed 77.27% of the stone burden. Our exploratory analysis did not find any significant difference (P > 0.05) in the osteoprotegerin levels between various stone types though the osteoprotegerin levels were seen to increase universally among all types of stones as compared to controls (Table 3).

Table 3. Distribution of Location and Composition of Calculi Among Study Groups a
Study GroupTotal (n = 22)P Value
Male (n = 13)Female (n = 9)
Location of the stone> 0.05
Bilateral renal calculus 0 (0.00)1 (11.11)1 (4.55)
Left renal calculus 1 (7.69)2 (22.22)3 (13.64)
Left ureteric calculus 3 (23.08)1 (11.11)4 (18.18)
Right renal calculus 0 (0.00)2 (22.22)2 (9.09)
Right ureteric calculus 2 (15.38)3 (33.33)5 (22.73)
Vesical calculus 7 (53.85)0 (0.00)7 (31.82)
Composition of the stone> 0.05
Brushite0 (0.00)1 (11.11)1 (4.55)
Calcium oxalate 7 (53.85)3 (33.33)10 (45.45)
Calcium oxalate + ammonium urate (mixed)0 (0.00)1 (11.11)1 (4.55)
Calcium oxalate + uric acid (mixed)4 (30.77)2 (22.22)6 (27.27)
Uric acid0 (0.00)2 (22.22)2 (9.09)
Uric acid + brushite (mixed)2 (15.38)0 (0.00)2 (9.09)

aValues are expressed as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated.

5. Discussion

This study was undertaken as a pilot study to assess the relationship between osteoprotegerin and urolithiasis. Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a basic secretory glycoprotein. It is released under basal conditions by endothelial cells upon stimulation with inflammatory cytokines and various circulating hormones. Circulating OPG exists either as a free monomer of or as OPG bound to its ligands, receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand (RANKL) and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) (4, 5). Oxidative stress is a characteristic feature of the inflammatory response. There has been a link between the activation of leukocytes and other cells and the release of OPG. Besides, OPG can be produced and released by blood cells such as neutrophils and stem cells. Endothelial cells (EC) are a significant source of OPG, especially within the vasculature (6, 7). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) may influence human EC metabolism via Ca2+ signaling mechanisms. Interestingly, it has been reported that, in vascular cells, PDGF up regulates OPG expression (8). Vascular calcification is characterized by the deposition of Ca2+ and inorganic phosphate (Pi) in the form of hydroxyapatite (HA) crystals within the medial or intimal strata of blood vessels, which are the same mineral components found in the bone. Exposure to inflammatory atherosclerotic stress induces pericytes, which could be involved in the onset of the mineralized structure in plaques and the secretion of OPG, with human pericytes secreting high amounts of OPG in comparison with SMCs and ECs (9, 10).

Studies have also shown that OPG participates in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and coronary vascular diseases by amplifying the adverse effects of inflammation (5). There is clear evidence that OPG levels are high in conditions with extra-osseous mineralization. This extra-osseous mineralization is an essential way for the formation of calculi in the urinary tract. Oxidative stress is a postulated mechanism of oxalate-induced cell injury responsible for nucleation and crystal growth in the urothelium (11). Randall (1937) observed the areas of damage associated with subepithelial plaques on the renal papillae, which were supposed to be the future renal calculi.

Though OPG has been studied in chronic infections, intravascular calcifications, and sepsis (12), there are no direct comparative data between OPG and calculus disease to date. Thus, trying to assess the OPG levels among stone formers could make a novel approach for future diagnostic, as well as a prognostic evidence-based practice for subjects with urolithiasis. Our study is the first of its kind where we assessed the OPG levels in cases (group A) of documented urolithiasis and compared it with matched controls (group B), the results showing a good positive correlation. We found that OPG levels were increased in serum and 24-h urine samples of the patients with any stone types. More importantly, we found a negative association between 24-h urine OPG levels and the control group, with 77.27% showing nil or zero osteoprotegerin in the 24-h urine sample.

5.1. Conclusions

Our study found significantly higher levels of osteoprotegerin in serum and 24-h urine samples of cases than in the controls. The majority of the controls had a complete absence of osteoprotegerin in the 24-h urine samples. We definitely need to study this association in the future with a larger sample size to establish the correlation between osteoprotegerin and urolithiasis conclusively.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Sofia NH, Walter TM, Sanatorium T. Prevalence and risk factors of kidney stone. Glob J Res Anal. 2016;5(3):183-7.

  • 2.

    Rochette L, Meloux A, Rigal E, Zeller M, Malka G, Cottin Y, et al. The role of osteoprotegerin in vascular calcification and bone metabolism: The basis for developing new therapeutics. Calcif Tissue Int. 2019;105(3):239-51. doi: 10.1007/s00223-019-00573-6. [PubMed: 31197415].

  • 3.

    Khan SR. Is oxidative stress, a link between nephrolithiasis and obesity, hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, metabolic syndrome? Urol Res. 2012;40(2):95-112. doi: 10.1007/s00240-011-0448-9. [PubMed: 22213019]. [PubMed Central: PMC5683185].

  • 4.

    Walsh MC, Choi Y. Biology of the RANKL-RANK-OPG system in immunity, bone, and beyond. Front Immunol. 2014;5:511. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00511. [PubMed: 25368616]. [PubMed Central: PMC4202272].

  • 5.

    Rochette L, Meloux A, Rigal E, Zeller M, Cottin Y, Vergely C. The role of osteoprotegerin in the crosstalk between vessels and bone: Its potential utility as a marker of cardiometabolic diseases. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;182:115-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.08.015. [PubMed: 28867452].

  • 6.

    Kobayashi-Sakamoto M, Hirose K, Isogai E, Chiba I. NF-kappaB-dependent induction of osteoprotegerin by Porphyromonas gingivalis in endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;315(1):107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.01.024. [PubMed: 15013432].

  • 7.

    Kobayashi-Sakamoto M, Isogai E, Hirose K, Chiba I. Role of alphav integrin in osteoprotegerin-induced endothelial cell migration and proliferation. Microvasc Res. 2008;76(3):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2008.06.004. [PubMed: 18656492].

  • 8.

    Zhang J, Fu M, Myles D, Zhu X, Du J, Cao X, et al. PDGF induces osteoprotegerin expression in vascular smooth muscle cells by multiple signal pathways. FEBS Lett. 2002;521(1-3):180-4. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(02)02872-7. [PubMed: 12067713].

  • 9.

    Navarro R, Compte M, Alvarez-Vallina L, Sanz L. Immune regulation by pericytes: Modulating innate and adaptive immunity. Front Immunol. 2016;7:480. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00480. [PubMed: 27867386]. [PubMed Central: PMC5095456].

  • 10.

    Hung CF, Mittelsteadt KL, Brauer R, McKinney BL, Hallstrand TS, Parks WC, et al. Lung pericyte-like cells are functional interstitial immune sentinel cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2017;312(4):L556-67. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00349.2016. [PubMed: 28188224]. [PubMed Central: PMC5407093].

  • 11.

    Thamilselvan S, Khan SR. Oxalate and calcium oxalate crystals are injurious to renal epithelial cells: results of in vivo and in vitro studies. J Nephrol. 1998;11 Suppl 1:66-9. [PubMed: 9604816].

  • 12.

    Kemperman H, Schrijver IT, Roest M, Kesecioglu J, van Solinge WW, de Lange DW. Osteoprotegerin is higher in sepsis than in noninfectious SIRS and predicts 30-day mortality of SIRS patients in the intensive care. J Appl Lab Med. 2019;3(4):559-68. doi: 10.1373/jalm.2018.026559. [PubMed: 31639725].

  • Copyright © 2021, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
    COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: