The Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir/Daclatasvir Fixed-Dose Combination in Iranian Hemodialysis Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Infection

AUTHORS

Kasra Ghanaat 1 , Heidar Sharafi ORCID 2 , Seyed Moayed Alavian ORCID 1 , 2 , *

1 Baqiyatallah Research Center for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Middle East Liver Diseases (MELD) Center, Tehran, Iran

How to Cite: Ghanaat K, Sharafi H, Alavian S M . The Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir/Daclatasvir Fixed-Dose Combination in Iranian Hemodialysis Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Infection, Nephro-Urol Mon. Online ahead of Print ; In Press(In Press):e114049. doi: 10.5812/numonthly.114049.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Nephro-Urology Monthly: In Press (In Press); e114049
Published Online: April 18, 2021
Article Type: Brief Report
Received: March 7, 2021
Accepted: March 12, 2021
1 scheduled for 13 (2)
Crossmark
Crossmark
CHECKING
READ FULL TEXT

Abstract

Background: Although several regimens have been approved for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, sofosbuvir-based regimens are not approved for the treatment of HCV infection in patients with severe renal impairment.

Methods: This study was conducted on hemodialysis patients infected with HCV. The patients received a constant dose of sofosbuvir/daclatasvir (SOF/DCV). Sustained virologic response (SVR) was evaluated 12 weeks after completion of treatment.

Results: Fifty-one hemodialysis patients with HCV infection were selected and treated with a combination of SOF/DCV. Eleven patients expired during the anti-HCV treatment due to causes not related to liver disease or antiviral therapy. Finally, 40 patients finished the treatment, and 36 cases were evaluated for SVR. Among those tested for SVR, 35 (97.2%, 95% CI: 85.5 - 99.9%) achieved SVR and one (2.8%, 95% CI: 0.1 - 14.5%) relapsed. No patient reported severe adverse events.

Conclusions: The combination of SOF/DCV showed great efficacy and safety in hemodialysis patients with severe renal impairment and chronic HCV infection.

1. Background

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an infectious disease affecting approximately 71 million people worldwide (1, 2). Chronic HCV infection leads to chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, and in some cases, it can lead to hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (3). While kidney disease can be an extrahepatic manifestation of HCV infection, HCV can also be transmitted in patients with renal disease through hemodialysis (4). Chronic HCV infection is prevalent in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, and it can increase the morbidity and mortality rate of hemodialysis and kidney transplant patients (5). Furthermore, HCV infection accelerates renal deterioration by glomerulonephritis or cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (6). Consequently, the elimination of HCV infection can reduce mortality by ameliorating complications in patients on chronic hemodialysis (2, 5, 7-9).

Until recent years, the treatment of HCV infection was based on interferon-based therapies, which started even before the identification of HCV in 1989 (10). The significant development in the understanding of molecular virology, pathogenesis, and the structure of HCV affected the clinical treatments of HCV infection, which commenced the practice of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) (11). Since sofosbuvir (SOF), as the main component of HCV antiviral treatment, is not recommended in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, the treatment of HCV among patients on hemodialysis is challenging in terms of the limited number of approved regimens (12-14).

SOF, a nucleotide analog, and HCV RNA polymerase (NS5B) inhibitor is a common treatment for HCV infection. Turning to patients with renal impairments, SOF is only approved for patients with an eGFR > 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, since the major metabolite of SOF (GS-331007) is significantly higher in these patients. Many studies suggested the favorable outcome of utilizing SOF in patients with renal complications. For example, Dumortier et al. (15) strongly suggested that SOF treatment with the dose reduction is safe and efficient in patients with end-stage renal disease and those undergoing hemodialysis. Daclatasvir (DCV) is an inhibitor of the HCV NS5A replication complex that stops HCV viral RNA transcription and protein translation. A study by Garimella et al. (16) demonstrated the single-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of DCV in subjects with renal function impairment. The combination of SOF/DCV is used for HCV infection, and both were recommended by previous studies for patients with renal impairments (11, 17, 18). However, it is not recommended to use SOF in CKD with eGFR < 30. There are regimens without SOF, such as grazoprevir/elbasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, which are used for CKD with eGFR < 30; but these regimens are not available in Iran as brand name or generics. Therefore, we attempted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the SOF/DCV for the treatment of hemodialysis patients with HCV infection.

2. Methods

The current retrospective study was conducted at the Middle East Liver Disease (MELD) Center, Tehran, Iran, from 2017 to 2019. The participants included 51 individuals aged > 18 years old, who were on hemodialysis due to renal impairment with eGFR < 30, and suffering from HCV infection in the chronic phase (positive for HCV RNA for over six months). Subjects with HCC, Child-Pugh score > 12, low heart rate (< 50/min), under medication of amiodarone for the past six months, or have a history of failure to NS5A inhibitor-containing regimen, and also patients with HIV or HBV coinfections were excluded from the study. All patients were subjected to constant dose SOF 400 mg/DCV 60 mg (Sodakvir®; Bakhtar Bioshimi, Kermanshah, Iran or Datex®; Sobhan Medicine Trade Development Co, Tehran, Iran) for 12 weeks in patients without cirrhosis, and 24 weeks in patients with cirrhosis. We evaluated the treatment efficacy utilizing the PCR assay (COBAS TaqMan, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) 12 weeks after treatment termination, and undetectable HCV RNA was regarded as a sustained virologic response (SVR). Treatment safety was assessed in terms of severe adverse events reported by the study participants.

This study was performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki with the ethical code of IR.BMSU.BAQ.REC.1398.017. The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences (BUMS), Tehran, Iran. Due to the retrospective design of the study, we did not get written informed consent from the participants. The statistical analysis was conducted utilizing SPSS version 22.0 software.

3. Results

A total of 51 hemodialysis patients with HCV infection were recruited in this study, 31.4% of whom had cirrhosis. Moreover, 35 (68.6%) patients were males, and the mean age of subjects was 57.6 years old. The majority (84.3%) of patients did not have any history of HCV antiviral therapy (Table 1).

Table 1. Baseline Characteristic of Patients a
CharacteristicsAll patients (N = 51)
Age (y)57.6 ± 12.0
Gender
Male35 (68.6)
Female16 (31.4)
BMI (kg/m2)23.8 ± 4.2
Hemoglobin (g/dL)11.7 ± 2.0
Platelet count (109/L)179.6 ± 77.5
AST (IU/L)29.7 ± 27.2
ALT (IU/L)33.8 ± 55.3
Creatinine (mg/dL)8.6 ± 7.5
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)0.8 ± 0.4
Direct bilirubin (mg/dL)0.2 ± 0.2
Liver disease status
Without cirrhosis35 (68.6)
With cirrhosis16 (31.4)
HCV genotype
126 (51.0)
22 (3.9)
39 (17.6)
43 (5.9)
Unknown11 (21.6)
Treatment history
Treatment naïve43 (84.3)
Interferon-experienced8 (15.7)
DAA-experienced0 (0)

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; DAA, direct-acting antiviral agent; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index.

a Values are expressed as mean ± SD and No. (%).

All 35 (68.6%) patients who indicated no cirrhosis signs were subjected to a constant dose of SOF/DCV for 12 weeks and 16 (31.4%) patients with cirrhosis were treated for 24 weeks.

Eleven patients were excluded during the treatment due to reasons not related to the liver diseases or antiviral therapy, and four subjects were lost to follow-up for evaluation of SVR (Figure 1). Among 36 subjects who completed the treatment and were available for the evaluation of SVR, 35 (97.2%, 95% CI: 85.5 - 99.9%) patients achieved SVR and only one (2.8%, 95% CI: 0.1 - 14.5%) patient relapsed. The patient with treatment failure was a 59-year-old patient with cirrhosis and without any history of treatment. None of the patients reported severe adverse events in the appointments nor discontinued treatment as a result of the treatment-related adverse events.

4. Discussion

This study attempted to investigate the safety and efficacy of SOF/DCV combination therapy in Iranian hemodialysis patients with chronic HCV infection. Several studies have shown that HCV infection in hemodialysis patients increases morbidity and mortality rates. A study by Kalantar-Zadeh et al. (19) in the US, including 13,000 hemodialysis patients, demonstrated that HCV infection increased the mortality rate in hemodialysis patients. The prevalence of HCV infection in hemodialysis patients was reported as 13.5% in America, Europe, and Asia (20). It has been shown that the treatment of patients on hemodialysis with chronic HCV infection is challenging. Before the first-generation DAAs (telaprevir and boceprevir), the gold standard of care for HCV infection was pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin. However, ribavirin is not tolerated in patients with renal impairment since it is eliminated mainly by the kidney and it cannot be removed by hemodialysis, and utilizing peg-IFN alone is accompanied with low response rate, therein lies the problem for the treatment of HCV infection in hemodialysis patients (5). Consequently, the introduction of DAA-based IFN- and RBV-free regimens changed the HCV management scenario in hemodialysis patients. However, low doses of SOF (200 mg daily or 400 mg three times a week) are suggested in patients with renal impairment because the predominant metabolite of SOF (GS-331007) is excreted by the kidney, and in patients with renal impairment, the plasma level of GS-331007 increased up to 20 times. It should be noted that hemodialysis removes this metabolite from the plasma by 53%, even though there is no evidence for the adverse effect of GS metabolite of SOF (21, 22).

Poustchi et al. (23) pointed out that even though there was no pharmacokinetic data indicating plasma level of SOF, administration of SOF/DCV in Iranian hemodialysis patients with HCV infection and renal impairment was proved to be safe without observation of any serious adverse event, which is in line with our results. A meta-analysis (24) showed that SOF-based regimens are effective, with a 97% SVR12 rate, in patients with advanced CKD. In this meta-analysis, the efficacy of SOF/DCV in patients with advanced CKD was 97%, which is consistent with the results of the current study (24). Dual administration of DCV and SOF daily demonstrated a noticeable effect in the course of 12-week treatment in HCV patients. The safety and tolerance of this treatment have been approved to be sufficient (25). Interestingly, DCV is mainly eliminated through the liver by cytochrome p450, thereby making it a great candidate for the combinational therapy of HCV patients with renal impairments (26).

The main limitations of this study included single-center case recruitment, small sample size, and retrospective data collection, which limited the results in terms of patient follow-up and collecting the treatment adherence and side effects data.

This study showed that not only a combination of SOF/DCV is safe for the treatment of hemodialysis patients with HCV infection, but also it can affect the clinical management of HCV infection according to excellent efficacy of treatment in patients with severe renal impairment (97.2% of patients achieved SVR). The SOF/DCV regimen can help eliminate the HCV infection in patients with advanced CKD in Iran and other countries where the approved regimens for these patients are unavailable.

Acknowledgements

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Polaris Observatory H. C. V. Collaborators. Global prevalence and genotype distribution of hepatitis C virus infection in 2015: A modelling study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2(3):161-76. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30181-9. [PubMed: 28404132].

  • 2.

    Stanaway JD, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Fitzmaurice C, Vos T, Abubakar I, et al. The global burden of viral hepatitis from 1990 to 2013: Findings from the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2016;388(10049):1081-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30579-7. [PubMed: 27394647]. [PubMed Central: PMC5100695].

  • 3.

    de Oliveria Andrade LJ, D'Oliveira A, Melo RC, De Souza EC, Costa Silva CA, Parana R. Association between hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma. J Glob Infect Dis. 2009;1(1):33-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-777X.52979. [PubMed: 20300384]. [PubMed Central: PMC2840947].

  • 4.

    Nguyen DB, Bixler D, Patel PR. Transmission of hepatitis C virus in the dialysis setting and strategies for its prevention. Semin Dial. 2019;32(2):127-34. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12761. [PubMed: 30569604]. [PubMed Central: PMC6411055].

  • 5.

    Kim SM, Song IH. Hepatitis C virus infection in chronic kidney disease: paradigm shift in management. Korean J Intern Med. 2018;33(4):670-8. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2018.202. [PubMed: 29961309]. [PubMed Central: PMC6030406].

  • 6.

    Barsoum RS, William EA, Khalil SS. Hepatitis C and kidney disease: A narrative review. J Adv Res. 2017;8(2):113-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2016.07.004. [PubMed: 28149647]. [PubMed Central: PMC5272932].

  • 7.

    World Health Organization. Monitoring and evaluation for viral hepatitis B and C: recommended indicators and framework. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016.

  • 8.

    Manns MP, Buti M, Gane E, Pawlotsky JM, Razavi H, Terrault N, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17006. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.6. [PubMed: 28252637].

  • 9.

    Dearborn AD, Marcotrigiano J. Hepatitis C virus structure: Defined by what it is not. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020;10(1). doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a036822. [PubMed: 31501263]. [PubMed Central: PMC6938659].

  • 10.

    Haj-Sheykholeslami A, Keshvari M, Sharafi H, Pouryasin A, Hemmati K, Mohammadzadehparjikolaei F. Interferon-lambda polymorphisms and response to pegylated interferon in Iranian hepatitis C patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(29):8935-42. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i29.8935. [PubMed: 26269684]. [PubMed Central: PMC4528037].

  • 11.

    Alavian SM, Hajarizadeh B, Bagheri Lankarani K, Sharafi H, Ebrahimi Daryani N, Merat S, et al. Recommendations for the clinical management of hepatitis C in Iran: A consensus-based national guideline. Hepat Mon. 2016;16(8). e40959. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.guideline. [PubMed: 27799966]. [PubMed Central: PMC5075356].

  • 12.

    Fabrizi F, Dixit V, Martin P, Messa P. Combined antiviral therapy of hepatitis C virus in dialysis patients: Meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Viral Hepat. 2011;18(7):e263-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2010.01405.x. [PubMed: 21108701].

  • 13.

    Huang Y, Li MH, Hou M, Xie Y. Peginterferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in the era of direct-acting antivirals. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2017;16(5):470-9. doi: 10.1016/S1499-3872(17)60044-4. [PubMed: 28992878].

  • 14.

    Salvadori M, Tsalouchos A. Hepatitis C and renal transplantation in era of new antiviral agents. World J Transplant. 2018;8(4):84-96. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v8.i4.84. [PubMed: 30148074]. [PubMed Central: PMC6107518].

  • 15.

    Dumortier J, Bailly F, Pageaux GP, Vallet-Pichard A, Radenne S, Habersetzer F, et al. Sofosbuvir-based antiviral therapy in hepatitis C virus patients with severe renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32(12):2065-71. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw348. [PubMed: 27760839].

  • 16.

    Garimella T, Wang R, Luo WL, Hwang C, Sherman D, Kandoussi H, et al. Single-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of daclatasvir in subjects with renal function impairment. Antivir Ther. 2015;20(5):535-43. doi: 10.3851/IMP2941. [PubMed: 25654812].

  • 17.

    Li M, Chen J, Fang Z, Li Y, Lin Q. Sofosbuvir-based regimen is safe and effective for hepatitis C infected patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Virol J. 2019;16(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12985-019-1140-x. [PubMed: 30871566]. [PubMed Central: PMC6419462].

  • 18.

    Sperl J, Frankova S, Kreidlova M, Merta D, Tothova M, Spicak J. Combination of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir in the treatment of genotype 3 chronic hepatitis C virus infection in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017;13:733-8. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S133983. [PubMed: 28790832]. [PubMed Central: PMC5488764].

  • 19.

    Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kilpatrick RD, McAllister CJ, Miller LG, Daar ES, Gjertson DW, et al. Hepatitis C virus and death risk in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18(5):1584-93. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006070736. [PubMed: 17429053].

  • 20.

    Fissell RB, Bragg-Gresham JL, Woods JD, Jadoul M, Gillespie B, Hedderwick SA, et al. Patterns of hepatitis C prevalence and seroconversion in hemodialysis units from three continents: The DOPPS. Kidney Int. 2004;65(6):2335-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00649.x. [PubMed: 15149347].

  • 21.

    Burra P, Rodriguez-Castro KI, Marchini F, Bonfante L, Furian L, Ferrarese A, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection in end-stage renal disease and kidney transplantation. Transpl Int. 2014;27(9):877-91. doi: 10.1111/tri.12360. [PubMed: 24853721].

  • 22.

    Desnoyer A, Pospai D, Le MP, Gervais A, Heurgue-Berlot A, Laradi A, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of a full dose sofosbuvir-based regimen given daily in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 2016;65(1):40-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.02.044. [PubMed: 26952005].

  • 23.

    Poustchi H, Majd Jabbari S, Merat S, Sharifi AH, Shayesteh AA, Shayesteh E, et al. The combination of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir is effective and safe in treating patients with hepatitis C and severe renal impairment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;35(9):1590-4. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14994. [PubMed: 31994788].

  • 24.

    Majd Jabbari S, Maajani K, Merat S, Poustchi H, Sepanlou SG. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis on efficacy of Sofosbuvir in treating hepatitis C-infected patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. PLoS One. 2021;16(2). e0246594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246594. [PubMed: 33566846]. [PubMed Central: PMC7875415].

  • 25.

    Manolakopoulos S, Zacharakis G, Zissis M, Giannakopoulos V. Safety and efficacy of daclatasvir in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Ann Gastroenterol. 2016;29(3):282-96. doi: 10.20524/aog.2016.0041. [PubMed: 27366028]. [PubMed Central: PMC4923813].

  • 26.

    Suda G, Kudo M, Nagasaka A, Furuya K, Yamamoto Y, Kobayashi T, et al. Efficacy and safety of daclatasvir and asunaprevir combination therapy in chronic hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Gastroenterol. 2016;51(7):733-40. doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1162-8. [PubMed: 26768604].

  • Copyright © 2021, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
    COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: