The Effect of BCAA and ISO-WHEY Oral Nutritional Supplements on Dialysis Adequacy


Effat Afaghi 1 , Ali Tayebi 2 , * , Abbas Ebadi 3 , Vahid Sobhani 4 , Behzad Einollahi 2 , Mehdi Tayebi 5

1 Nursing Faculty, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran

2 Nephrology and Urology Research Center, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran

3 Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran

4 Exercise Physiology Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran

5 Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, IR Iran

How to Cite: Afaghi E, Tayebi A, Ebadi A, Sobhani V, Einollahi B, et al. The Effect of BCAA and ISO-WHEY Oral Nutritional Supplements on Dialysis Adequacy, Nephro-Urol Mon. 2016 ; 8(6):e34993. doi: 10.5812/numonthly.34993.


Nephro-Urology Monthly: 8 (6); e34993
Published Online: September 5, 2016
Article Type: Research Article
Received: November 23, 2015
Accepted: December 31, 2015


Background: Protein-energy malnutrition is a common problem in hemodialysis patients and has different outcomes such as reduced quality of life, longer hospitalization time, lower dialysis adequacy, and higher mortality rate. Investigation of dialysis adequacy is an important method for assessing hemodialysis patients, and improving the dialysis adequacy is an important healthcare team goal.

Objectives: The present study aims to investigate and compare the effects of BCAA and ISO-WHEY oral nutritional supplements on dialysis adequacy.

Methods: In a clinical trial study, 66 hemodialysis patients were randomly divided into three groups: Group A (n = 22), Group B (n = 22), and Group C or the control group (n = 22). In Groups A and B, as prescribed and controlled by nutritionists and nephrologists, respectively, ISO-WHEY and BCAA protein powder were used for 2 months on a daily basis. For all groups, before intervention and 1 and 2 months after intervention, the dialysis adequacy was measured using URR and Kt/V. Finally, the data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics Base 21.0 software.

Results: Out of 66 patients, 61 (19 in Group A, 20 in Group B, and 22 in Group C) completed the study period, and before intervention, all groups were equal in terms of quality and quantity variables (P > 0.05). After intervention, there was a significant difference between the three groups with regard to the variables of dialysis adequacy based on Kt/V and URR to independent-t test and repeated measures ANOVA (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Results show that the intake of oral nutritional supplements leads to an improvement in the dialysis adequacy of hemodialysis patients. Therefore, the use of nutritional supplements along with patients' training and regular consultation will be helpful in improving the nutritional status, dialysis adequacy, and eventually the quality of life.

1. Background

Malnutrition is one of common problems in chronic dialysis patients (20% - 70%). Recently, protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) and systemic inflammation were found to be common in hemodialysis patients (1-4). Results of various studies show that daily intake of energy and protein in hemodialysis patients is less than the recommended dietary intake (energy: 35 kcal/kg/day and protein: 1 - 1.2 g/kg/day) (5-8). Unfortunately, 6% - 8% of hemodialysis patients suffer from severe malnutrition and 30% - 35% from moderate malnutrition. According to previous studies, in this group of patients, these factors are accompanied with reduced physical performance, increased risk of hospitalization, lower quality of life, and higher rate of mortality (9). Waste of protein during dialysis, reduction in protein intake because of anorexia or ignorance, higher metabolism during dialysis, dialysis inadequacy that leads to loss of appetite, and underlying diseases as well as economic problems are some of the major causes of malnutrition (9, 10).

Dialysis adequacy or effective dialysis dose is an important criterion in the assessment of hemodialysis patients. Measuring the dialysis adequacy is also a crucial objective for the healthcare team in a dialysis ward (11). Among the parameters for determining dialysis adequacy, urea reduction ratio (URR) and Kt/V (K: urea clearance filter; T: dialysis time; and V: urea or water distribution volume) are noteworthy. According to renal physician association (RPA) and international investigations on dialysis outcomes performed by national kidney foundation-dialysis outcomes quality initiative (NKF-DOQI), Kt/V is preferred over URR (12, 13). According to the RPA’s 1993 clinical practice guideline on adequacy, the recommended Kt/V should be at least 1.2 and the minimum URR should be greater than 65% for dialysis adequacy. NKF-DOQI also determined the same figures in 1997 and changed the target Kt/V to 1.4 in 2006, while Kt/V > 1.2 was considered as the minimum acceptable (14, 15). Dialysis adequacy is associated with appetite, nutrient intake, and nutrition rate; on the other hand, dialysis inadequacy is one of the main causes of malnutrition as well as mortality (14).

National kidney association of America recommends the periodic checking of dialysis adequacy. Studies performed in different parts of Iran showed unfavorable dialysis adequacy in hemodialysis patients; in the studies conducted in Kerman (16), Mashhad (11), Rasht (13), Hamadan, Kashan, Bojnurd, Kordestan, and Sari, the percentages of hemodialysis patients who had Kt/V < 1.2 were as follows: 91.3%, 60.4%, 23.7%, 100%, 90%, 52.5%, and 58.80%, respectively (12).

Bolasco et al. (2011) (17) stated that nutrition counseling and assessment of dialysis adequacy could be considered the first steps to improve nutritional status, after which protein-based oral nutritional supplements are recommended. In fact, special renal dietary supplements in hemodialysis patients with reduction in protein intake may lead to the improvement of nutrition status and better dialysis adequacy, which will eventually lead to a higher quality of life without the need to use phosphate-binding agents.

2. Objectives

Therefore, given the studies, high malnutrition statistics, and dialysis inadequacy, this study aims to investigate the effect of protein-based (ISO-WHEY and BCAA) oral nutritional supplements on the dialysis adequacy of hemodialysis patients.

3. Methods

The present study is a triple clinical trial that was performed in hemodialysis ward of Baqiyatallah hospital in Tehran from June to December 2014. Sample size was determined considering Altman’s nomogram, Type I error (α) as 0.05, Type II error (β) as 10%, study power as 80%, standard deviation (EZ = 2.1) from Bolasco et al. (2011) study (17), and 10% loss of sample probability. Each group (Groups A, B, and C) was assigned 22 patients, and the total number of participants was 66.

At first, eligible patients were randomly divided into three groups based on the following inclusion criteria: patients in the age group of 18 - 75 years; patients who have underwent hemodialysis at least twice a week for a minimum of 6 months; serum albumin levels less than 4 gr/dL; BMI greater than 18.5 kg/m2; no severe infection; no severe respiratory and heart failure; no chronic disease with unknown origin; no chronic liver disease, nephritic syndrome, cancer, dementia, neurologic diseases, type B hepatitis, type C hepatitis, or active infection during the previous 4 months; recent surgery during the previous 3 months or lack of follow up; and lack of parenteral nutrition as well as oral supplements.

3.1. Ethical Considerations

After receiving permission from the research committee of Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences and registration in the clinical trial website (IRCT201209088650N5) , in coordination with hospital administrators, the aim of the study was explained to the patients and caregivers (if necessary), and they declared their consent regarding conscious participation in the research.

3.2. Measurement Tools and Method

Personal information, including age, gender, net weight, height, marital status, education, dialysis treatment duration, and the reason for dialysis, was collected using a demographic questionnaire. For patients who needed help to complete the questionnaire (such as vision problems), the questionnaire was read and the answers were recorded without any changes or judgment. Dialysis adequacy rate was measured by determining Kt/V, which was calculated using the Daugirdas II Equation 1 and URR. Kt/V is a ratio that shows the volume of cleared plasma over urea distribution volume as follows (12, 13):

Daugirdas II Equation 1.
Daugirdas II Equation 2.

ln: natural logarithm, R: ratio of postdialysis blood urea nitrogen (BUN) to predialysis BUN (R = BUN2/BUN1); T: duration of each dialysis session, UF: ultrafiltration volume, W: weight after dialysis.

3.3. Interventions

Before intervention, in all the three groups, patients’ height was measured in centimeters and their body weight was recorded using a Seca scale (with an accuracy of 100 g). After the patients were placed in beds, about 4 mL of their blood was taken for blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (Cr) tests before they were connected to the dialysis machine. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing the body weight (kg) by the square of height (m2). After the dialysis session, the second sampling was done for the BUN test, and the patients were weighed again. An arterial needle was used for blood sampling before dialysis, and the blood pump speed was reduced to approximately 50 - 100 mL/min for 10 - 20 s for sampling after dialysis. Then, the blood pump was stopped, and the blood sample was taken from the arterial line. The results of the tests were recorded in special forms for data collection. Before intervention, the dialysis adequacy of the patients was determined using Kt/V and URR. Moreover, training classes about nutrition and its importance in hemodialysis patients were held for nurses and patients before intervention. Then, the patients of Group A were given ISO-WHEY oral nutritional supplements and those of Group B were given BCAA oral nutritional supplements prepared by Karen Pharma and Food Supplement Co. Daily intake of supplements (as prescribed by nutrition and nephrology specialists for 2 months) was explained to the patients and caregivers. The control group (Group C) received routine diet without the use of any supplement for 2 months. Patients were reminded to take supplements and followed up through telephone calls, short messages, and in person. Nutrition counseling was done on a monthly basis, and nephrology specialist visits took place every week. The project executive was responsible to answer patients’ questions during the intervention. At the end of the first month and at the end of study, the same measurements were recorded as before intervention and URR and Kt/V were calculated in all the three groups.

3.4. Statistical Tests

IBM SPSS Statistics Base 21.0 software was used along with Chi-Square test, independent t-test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and repeated measures ANOVA in order to analyze the data obtained. The minimum significance level was 0.05.

4. Results

Out of the 66 participants in the study, 61 patients completed the study period with all assessments. The most prevalent complication reported by patients was gastrointestinal problems such as nausea and bloating; as a result, nutrition and nephrology specialists recommended them to start with a lower dosage of supplements, gradually increasing it to the target prescribed dosage. Of 22 patients in the ISO-WHEY group, three patients (one female and two males) discontinued the intake of oral nutritional supplements because of gastrointestinal complications. Of the BCAA group, two patients (male) discontinued the intervention because of gastrointestinal complications and one of them underwent a transplant procedure. Thirty-three patients (54.09%) were males with an average age of 58.28 years. According to the statistical tests of Chi-Square and one-way ANOVA, the distribution of demographic variables was found to be homogenous in all the groups (Tables 1 and 2).

There was no significant difference between the three groups based on Kt/V and URR in the first step (before intervention) (P > 0.05). Therefore, the groups were homogenous in this step. However, there was a significant difference between the groups in the second step (1 month after intervention) and the third step (2 months after intervention) (P < 0.05) (Table 3). Moreover, repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant statistical difference in the average changes in dialysis adequacy based on Kt/V and URR among the three groups (Figures 1 and 2). The post-hoc test showed that the difference between these three groups is because of the ISO-WHEY and control groups.

Table 1. Demographic Quantitative Variables in ISO-WHEY, BCAA, and Control Groups
ParameterHemodialysis GroupsANOVA Test
ISO-WHEY Mean (SD)BCAA Mean (SD)Control Mean (SD)
Age, y59.89 (10.75)53.5 (10.14)61.45 (14.1)F = 2.09; P = 0.13
BMI, kg/m225.67 (4.77)23.52 (4.07)26.1 (8.85)F = 0.96; P = 0.38
Hemodialysis duration, y4.21 (3.76)3.05 (5.32)2.84 (2.62)F = 0.66; P = 0.51
Table 2. Frequency Distribution of Demographic Quantitative Variables in ISO-WHEY, BCAA, and Control Groups
ParameterHemodialysis GroupsTotalChi-Square Test
ISO-WHEY Frequency (%)BCAA Frequency (%)Control Frequency (%)
Genderχ2 = 0.62; P = 0.73
Male9 (47.4)12 (60)12 (54.5)170
Female10 (52.6)8 (40)10 (45.5)130
Primary school and lower5 (26.3)6 (30)3 (13.6)112χ2 = 4.51; P = 0.34
Diploma7 (36.8)7 (35)14 (63.6)108
University7 (36.8)7 (35)5 (22.7)80
Number of dialysis sessions per weekχ2 = 0.25; P = 0.68
22 (10.53)1 (5)2 (9.09)20
317 (89.47)19 (95.5)20 (90.91)166
Duration of a hemodialysis sessionχ2 = 0.63; P = 0.49
< 3 h 30 min2 (10.53)3 (15)4 (18.18)
> 3 h 30 min17 (89.47)17 (85)18 (81.82)
Total19 (100)20 (100)22 (100)61
Table 3. Average of Dialysis Adequacy Values Based on Kt/V and URR in Different Measurement Steps
ParameterHemodialysis GroupsANOVA Test
ISO-WHEY Mean (SD)BCAA Mean (SD)Control Mean (SD)
Before intervention
Kt/V1.12 (0.14)1.06 (0.17)1.12 (0.34)F = 0.34; P = 0.71
URR60.84 (5.23)59.1 (6.19)59.59 (12.71)F = 0.19; P = 0.82
1 month after intervention
Kt/V1.24 (0.19)1.03 (0.17)1.05 (0.21)F = 7.08; P = 0.002
URR65.89 (5.16)58.5 (6.27)59.31 (7.88)F = 7.34; P = 0.001
2 months after intervention
Kt/V1.32 (0.35)1.26 (0.19)1.06 (0.26)F = 5.04; P = 0.01
URR66.68 (7.49)66.05 (6.61)60.13 (9.23)F = 4.37; P = 0.01
Repeated measures ANOVA
Kt/VF = 5.53; P < 0.001F = 5.53; P < 0.001F = 5.53; P < 0.001F = 5.53; P < 0.001
URRF = 3.83; P = 0.008F = 3.83; P = 0.008F = 3.83; P = 0.008F = 3.83; P = 0.008
Figure 1. Average Changes in the Dialysis Adequacy Based on Kt/V in Different Measurement Steps
Figure 2. Average Changes in Dialysis Adequacy Based on URR in Different Measurement Steps

5. Discussion

The present study aimed to investigate the effect of protein-based oral nutritional supplements on the dialysis adequacy of hemodialysis patients. Initially, ISO-WHEY, BCAA, and control groups did not show a significant difference regarding qualitative and quantitative variables as well as nutritional status; in other words, the three groups were homogenous at the first of study. Nutritional supplements are usually recommended in different studies in order to maintain nutritional status; however, it is not commonly observed (18, 19). In the case of chronic renal diseases, such as end stage renal disease (ESRD), as well as hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, protein absorption is incomplete, and it leads to gastrointestinal complications due to potentially toxic metabolites, such as thiol, phenol, and amines, which appear because of the fermentation of unabsorbed proteins by microbial flora in the large intestine (20, 21). To the best of our knowledge, few clinical trial studies have been performed thus far to investigate the effect of oral nutritional supplements in hemodialysis patients (22).

According to the results of this study, the dialysis adequacy of all patients studied was lower that acceptable minimum (Kt/V > 1.2) at the first of study, which reflected unfavorable dialysis adequacy in these patients (11, 12, 16). According to the studies by renal physicians association in the United States, for every 0.1 increase in Kt/V up to 1.2, the mortality rate decreases by 0.7%, and for every 5% increase in the URR up to 65%, the mortality rate decreases up to 11% (23). According to findings of the present study, protein-based oral nutritional supplements increase the dialysis adequacy based on Kt/V and URR in the ISO-WHEY and BCAA groups in comparison to the control group. Another important observation is that the average changes in dialysis adequacy based on Kt/V and URR in the ISO-WHEY and BCAA groups are higher than those of the control group. Given post-hoc test, these changes are because of the ISO-WHEY and control groups. In other words, although the intake of nutritional supplements improves the dialysis adequacy, ISO-WHEY nutritional supplements are found to have a better impact on dialysis adequacy than that of BCAA. A study performed by Bolasco et al. showed that oral amino acid supplements increase the dialysis adequacy based on Kt/V in intervention groups, although no statistically significant difference was observed (17). Findings of a study conducted by Caesar et al. (5) show no statistically significant difference based on URR in the intervention group in comparison to the control group, which may be because of the difference in sample size, daily diet in different cultures, intervention duration, and other factors influencing the dialysis adequacy (such as diet, individual’s size, training to patients, underlying diseases, filter type, dialysis duration, blood flow rate, dialysis flow rate, and urea distribution volume that in turn depend on the gender, height, and weight (24)). Given various studies and their results as well as the findings of the present study on the need to use protein-based oral nutritional supplements in dialysis patients and the prevalence of this issue, it is recommended to perform studies with larger sample size across a longer period of time. Investigating other hemodialysis outcomes such as nutritional status, quality of life, fatigue, and depression is also useful.

5.1. Conclusions

According to findings, it can be concluded that use of protein-based oral nutritional supplements will improve the dialysis adequacy in hemodialysis patients and any efforts to improve the nutritional status will be accompanied with an improvement in the dialysis adequacy, which will eventually lead to better nutritional conditions and lower mortality rates.




  • 1.

    Kalantar-Zadeh K. Protein-Energy Wasting. Nutrition in Kidney Disease. 2014; : 219 -30

  • 2.

    Hernandez Morante JJ, Sanchez-Villazala A, Cutillas RC, Fuentes MC. Effectiveness of a nutrition education program for the prevention and treatment of malnutrition in end-stage renal disease. J Ren Nutr. 2014; 24(1) : 42 -9 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 3.

    Kuhlmann MK, Karibben A, Wittwer M, Horl WH. Malnutrition in chronic renal failure. Nephrol dial transplant. 2007; 220(22) : 13 -9

  • 4.

    Malgorzewicz S, Aleksandrowicz-Wrona E, Owczarzak A, Debska-Slizien A, Rutkowski B, Lysiak-Szydlowska W. Adipokines and nutritional status for patients on maintenance hemodialysis. J Ren Nutr. 2010; 20(5) : 303 -8 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 5.

    Sezer S, Bal Z, Tutal E, Uyar ME, Acar NO. Long-term oral nutrition supplementation improves outcomes in malnourished patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014; 38(8) : 960 -5 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 6.

    Kooshki A, Tabibi H, Rivandi M. Status of Macro- and Micronutrient Intake as Compared to DRI in Hemodialysis Patients. Quarter J Sabzevar Uni Med Sci. 2012; 19(1) : 69 -75

  • 7.

    Cho JH, Hwang JY, Lee SE, Jang SP, Kim WY. Nutritional status and the role of diabetes mellitus in hemodialysis patients. Nutr Res Pract. 2008; 2(4) : 301 -7 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 8.

    Bossola M, Muscaritoli M, Tazza L, Panocchia N, Liberatori M, Giungi S, et al. Variables associated with reduced dietary intake in hemodialysis patients. J Ren Nutr. 2005; 15(2) : 244 -52 [PubMed]

  • 9.

    Heng AE, Cano N. Nutritional problems in adult patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease on dialysis (both haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Clin Kidney J. 2010; 3(2) : 109 -17 [DOI]

  • 10.

    As'habi A, Nozari B, Tabibi H, Mahdavi-Mazdeh M, Hedayati M, Hoshyar Rad A. Prevalence of protein-energy malnutrition and its various types in hemodialysis patients in Tehran, 2008 [in Persian]. Iranian J Nutr Sci Food Tech. 2010; 5(1) : 17 -28

  • 11.

    Zeraati A, Naghibi M, Jabbari Noghabi H. Investigating factors affecting the adequacy of dialysis in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Med J Mashhad Uni Med Sci. 2008; 99(51) : 45 -52

  • 12.

    Hashemi M, Garshad A. Assissing the Adequacy of Dialysis and some biochemical Factors related to it in patient under Heamodialysis in Dialysis ward of Emam Ali Hospital Of Bojnourd. J North Khorasan Uni Med Sci. 2012; 4(4) : 665 -70

  • 13.

    Monfared A, Ourangpour R, Kohani M. Evaluation of hemodialysis adequency on patients undergoing hemodialysis in razi hospital in rasht. J Guilan uni Med Sci. 2008; 65(17) : 44 -9

  • 14.

    Daugirdas JT, Blake PG, Ing TS. Handbook of dialysis. 2007; : 25 -59

  • 15.

    NKF K. DOQI Guidelines 2006;

  • 16.

    Rashidfarokhi F, Majdzadeh N, Dehghani M. The Evaluation of Dietary Protein Intake by Calculation of Urea Generation Rate in Chronic Dialysis Patients in Kerman, 2002. J Kerman Uni Med Sci. 2004; 11(4) : 188 -96

  • 17.

    Bolasco P, Caria S, Cupisti A, Secci R, Saverio Dioguardi F. A novel amino acids oral supplementation in hemodialysis patients: a pilot study. Ren Fail. 2011; 33(1) : 1 -5 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 18.

    Kopple JD. Therapeutic approaches to malnutrition in chronic dialysis patients: the different modalities of nutritional support. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999; 33(1) : 180 -5 [PubMed]

  • 19.

    Kopple JD, National Kidney Foundation KWG. The National Kidney Foundation K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for dietary protein intake for chronic dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001; 38(4 Suppl 1) : 68 -73 [PubMed]

  • 20.

    Bammens B, Verbeke K, Vanrenterghem Y, Evenepoel P. Evidence for impaired assimilation of protein in chronic renal failure. Kidney Int. 2003; 64(6) : 2196 -203 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 21.

    Bammens B, Evenepoel P, Verbeke K, Vanrenterghem Y. Impairment of small intestinal protein assimilation in patients with end-stage renal disease: extending the malnutrition-inflammation-atherosclerosis concept. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004; 80(6) : 1536 -43 [PubMed]

  • 22.

    Caglar K, Fedje L, Dimmitt R, Hakim RM, Shyr Y, Ikizler TA. Therapeutic effects of oral nutritional supplementation during hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2002; 62(3) : 1054 -9 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 23.

    Shariati AR, Asayesh H, Nasiri H, Tajbakhsh R, Hesam M, Mollaee E. To compare dialysis adequacy in patient's that refered to Golestan province hemodialysis centers. J Health Promot Management. 2012; 1(3) : 55 -63

  • 24.

    Golbabai M. Dialysis administration and optimal dialysis ward circumstances 2002;

  • Copyright © 2016, Nephrology and Urology Research Center. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.