Study of ZUMS1 faculty members’ views on" faculty members’ assessment "

AUTHORS

A Keykhaei 1 , * , Ali Navidian 2 , Mohammad Ali Tabasi 3 , GH Sargazi 1

1 Anesthesia dept, faculty of medicine, Zahedan University of medical sciences and health services, Zahedan, Iran.

2 Nursing dept, faculty of nursing and midwifery education, Zahedan University of medical sciences and health services, Zahedan, Iran.

3 Librarian ship dept, faculty of medicine, Zahedan University of medical sciences and health services, Zahedan, Iran.

How to Cite: Keykhaei A, Navidian A, Tabasi M A, Sargazi G. Study of ZUMS1 faculty members’ views on" faculty members’ assessment ", Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2002 ; 4(3):e95329.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: 4 (3); e95329
Published Online: August 08, 2019
Article Type: Research Article
Received: July 01, 2002
Accepted: July 31, 2002
READ FULL TEXT

Abstract

University faculty members can be evaluated in different ways. One of the most controversial
ways is an assessment, which is done by students.
The present cross sectional study investigates the views held by 83 basic sciences faculty
members on faculty members’ assessment in 1380. The required data gathered through
questionnaire and analyzed by SPSS statistical software.
Findings shows that 60.1% of the research population determined the assessment by students,
more than 20% of the total score which is followed by research plans with 20.8%, self assessment
with 19.5%, group manager with 16.9%, assessment by colleagues with 13%, taught unit courses
with 8.9% and finally assessment by Faculty education deputy with 5.2%.
Research population believes that: personal grudges 57.9%, dishonesty 85.6% and carelessness
89.1% affects assessment forms.
Finally, On the basis of the findings, it can be said that if we wish to have a reliable evaluation
of faculty members, we should use different assessment methods simultaneously.

Fulltext

The full text of this article is available on the PDF file.

References

  • 1.

    The References of this article are available on the PDF file.

  • © 2002, Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
    COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: